Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
179,152 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYnpj Science of Learning

Regulation competencies and social well-being in at-risk adolescents: a systematic review of behavioral and neurophysiological research

  1. 1Science of Learning in Education Centre, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University

Abstract

This systematic review synthesized evidence on emotional, metacognitive, and social regulation competencies in at-risk adolescents and their associations with social well-being. Across 45 empirical studies, regulation consistently emerged as a key mechanism linking contextual adversity to empathy, belonging, resilience, and psychosocial outcomes. Neurophysiological measures provided emerging mechanistic insights into affective and stress-related processes but were rarely integrated with behavioral and social outcomes.

Related

  1. Effects of insomnia-focused psychological and behavioral interventions on depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Britta Galling, Jiamiao Wu, Amelie Oberstadt +4
    European Child & Adolescent PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  2. The interoceptive communication model (ICM 2.0): a state-dependent neurophysiological framework for behavioral and cognitive accessibility.
    Yoandra M Gomez Uncu, Leydis Morejón Rodríguez
    Frontiers in psychologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  3. Associations between behavioral intervention dose and outcomes in children and adolescents with obesity: meta-regression of randomized clinical trials
    Yakun Liu, Xiaoyan Shi, Tingwen Chen +4
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Sleep quality as a potential target in the behavioral network of children and adolescents with multimorbidity: a machine learning and computer‑simulated network intervention study
    Yi Yang, Duo Liu, Yayu Yang +4
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Avoiding Feelings and Resisting Closeness: A Network Analysis of Attachment and Affect Regulation in Adolescents with Mental Health Concerns
    Sherene Balanji, Marlene Moretti
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
BibTeX
@article{jamaludin2026regulation,
  title = {{Regulation competencies and social well-being in at-risk adolescents: a systematic review of behavioral and neurophysiological research}},
  author = {Azilawati Jamaludin and Sampathraman Samyuktha and Aik Lim Tan},
  journal = {npj Science of Learning},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1038/s41539-026-00435-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00435-5},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Regulation competencies and social well-being in at-risk adolescents: a systematic review of behavioral and neurophysiological research
AU  - Azilawati Jamaludin
AU  - Sampathraman Samyuktha
AU  - Aik Lim Tan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - npj Science of Learning
DO  - 10.1038/s41539-026-00435-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00435-5
AB  - This systematic review synthesized evidence on emotional, metacognitive, and social regulation competencies in at-risk adolescents and their associations with social well-being. Across 45 empirical studies, regulation consistently emerged as a key mechanism linking contextual adversity to empathy, belonging, resilience, and psychosocial outcomes. Neurophysiological measures provided emerging mechanistic insights into affective and stress-related processes but were rarely integrated with behavioral and social outcomes.
SN  - 2056-7936
ER  -