Robustness of Ancestral Recombination Graph Inference Tools to Phasing Errors
Abstract
Ancestral Recombination Graphs (ARGs) are fundamental population genetic structures that encode the genealogical history of a sample of haplotypes along the genome. They have recently received substantial attention as they can be used to provide accurate estimates of population history, form the foundation for selection scans, provide time-labeled estimates of changes in mutation rates, and more. ARGs can be inferred using multiple different methods, but these methods all rely on computational haplotype phasing. Previous studies have shown that the accuracy of haplotype phasing can be low when done in small or medium-sized samples, which are typical for most non-model organisms. Conventional wisdom would, therefore, suggest that ARG inferences are of limited utility in most non-model organisms. To test this assumption, we benchmark the robustness of four ARG inference methods — Relate, SINGER, Threads, and tsinfer+tsdate — to phasing errors. Their performance with imperfect phasing was tested under simple and realistic demographic models, and evaluated in terms of estimated pairwise coalescence times, counts of inferred recombination breakpoints, and estimated branch-length-based diversity. We observe only a slight degradation in performance when using computational phasing across all four methods and all tested demographic scenarios, demonstrating a surprising robustness of ARG inference methods to phasing inaccuracies. These findings support broader application of ARG inference in settings where large reference panels are not available.
Related
- Statistical inference of virus evolution using ancestral recombination graphs
- Barking Up Inferred Trees: Detecting Signatures of Selection in Dog Genomes Using Ancestral Recombination Graphs
- Ancestree: unified likelihood inference of ancestral alleles under supplied or inferred genealogies
- Bayesian phylogenetic inference accounting for recombination in whole bacterial genomes
- Navigating between global robustness and fine-scale resolution: the potential of demographic inference based on identical-by-descent segments.
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026robustness,
title = {{Robustness of Ancestral Recombination Graph Inference Tools to Phasing Errors}},
author = {Leyan Wang and Yun Deng and Rasmus Nielsen},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1101/2025.11.24.690249},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.24.690249},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Robustness of Ancestral Recombination Graph Inference Tools to Phasing Errors
AU - Leyan Wang
AU - Yun Deng
AU - Rasmus Nielsen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.1101/2025.11.24.690249
UR - https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.24.690249
AB - Ancestral Recombination Graphs (ARGs) are fundamental population genetic structures that encode the genealogical history of a sample of haplotypes along the genome. They have recently received substantial attention as they can be used to provide accurate estimates of population history, form the foundation for selection scans, provide time-labeled estimates of changes in mutation rates, and more. ARGs can be inferred using multiple different methods, but these methods all rely on computational haplotype phasing. Previous studies have shown that the accuracy of haplotype phasing can be low when done in small or medium-sized samples, which are typical for most non-model organisms. Conventional wisdom would, therefore, suggest that ARG inferences are of limited utility in most non-model organisms. To test this assumption, we benchmark the robustness of four ARG inference methods — Relate, SINGER, Threads, and tsinfer+tsdate — to phasing errors. Their performance with imperfect phasing was tested under simple and realistic demographic models, and evaluated in terms of estimated pairwise coalescence times, counts of inferred recombination breakpoints, and estimated branch-length-based diversity. We observe only a slight degradation in performance when using computational phasing across all four methods and all tested demographic scenarios, demonstrating a surprising robustness of ARG inference methods to phasing inaccuracies. These findings support broader application of ARG inference in settings where large reference panels are not available.
SN - 2692-8205
ER -