Health workers’ experiences with digital and cash payments during health campaigns in Nigeria: a qualitative study
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
- 2Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
- 3Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- 4Department of Health Planning, Policy and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
Abstract
BackgroundDigital financial services (DFS) for health worker remuneration have introduced a paradigm shift, addressing many of the challenges associated with cash payments. However, evidence on health workers’ experiences of digital and cash payments in Nigeria remains limited. This study explored health workers’ experiences and perceptions of digital and cash payments, with particular attention to satisfaction, motivation, perceived work performance, and the benefits and challenges associated with each payment modality.MethodsThis qualitative study was conducted among 171 purposively selected immunization campaign workers from three regions of Nigeria, including the Federal Capital Territory. Participants included both operational and strategic-level workers, such as local and state immunization officers. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (n = 12), key informant interviews (n = 12), and focus group discussions (n = 12; 147 discussants). Data collection was conducted from May to July 2023, and each interview lasted about 35 min. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded inductively, and analyzed thematically. The National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (NHREC/01/01/2007) approved the study.ResultsCampaign workers generally perceived digital payments as supporting their satisfaction, motivation, and willingness to perform assigned campaign activities compared with cash payments. Digital payments were valued for their transparency, direct funds transfer, timeliness, reduced intermediary involvement, and lower travel-related costs. Participants also described challenges, including delayed payments due to incorrect account information, difficulty resolving transaction problems, limited access to smartphones or bank accounts, and unstable internet connectivity, particularly in rural areas. Some participants therefore continued to prefer cash because it provided more immediate access to funds and depended less on digital infrastructure.ConclusionDigital payments were beneficial when remuneration was timely, accurate, and transparent, but depended on reliable implementation and infrastructure. Strengthening account verification, providing timely mechanisms for resolving payment problems, improving user training, and ensuring reliable connectivity may improve payment experiences and support health workers’ motivation and perceived work performance.
Related
- A qualitative exploration of community health workers' roles and motivations in delivering care during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences and community perceptions in rural and urban Delhi, India.
- Sex workers experiences of HIV prevention, healthcare access and mental health in the West Rand District, South Africa: a qualitative study
- Health workers' and administrators' experiences of duty handover on maternity wards in public health facilities in Hoima District, Uganda: a qualitative phenomenological study
- Health workers and administrators experiences of duty handover on maternity wards in public health facilities in Hoima District, Uganda: a qualitative phenomenological study
- Community health workers experiences with a digital clinical decision support system for longitudinal hypertension and diabetes care in rural Lesotho: a mixed-methods study
BibTeX
@article{alabi2026health,
title = {{Health workers’ experiences with digital and cash payments during health campaigns in Nigeria: a qualitative study}},
author = {Jesuloluwa Alabi and Folashayo P. Adeniji and Folashayo P. Adeniji and David A. Adewole and Segun Bello and Juliet Aweko and Elizabeth Ekirapa and Peter Waiswa and Olufunmilayo I. Fawole},
journal = {Frontiers in Digital Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fdgth.2026.1780807},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1780807},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Health workers’ experiences with digital and cash payments during health campaigns in Nigeria: a qualitative study
AU - Jesuloluwa Alabi
AU - Folashayo P. Adeniji
AU - Folashayo P. Adeniji
AU - David A. Adewole
AU - Segun Bello
AU - Juliet Aweko
AU - Elizabeth Ekirapa
AU - Peter Waiswa
AU - Olufunmilayo I. Fawole
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Frontiers in Digital Health
DO - 10.3389/fdgth.2026.1780807
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1780807
AB - BackgroundDigital financial services (DFS) for health worker remuneration have introduced a paradigm shift, addressing many of the challenges associated with cash payments. However, evidence on health workers’ experiences of digital and cash payments in Nigeria remains limited. This study explored health workers’ experiences and perceptions of digital and cash payments, with particular attention to satisfaction, motivation, perceived work performance, and the benefits and challenges associated with each payment modality.MethodsThis qualitative study was conducted among 171 purposively selected immunization campaign workers from three regions of Nigeria, including the Federal Capital Territory. Participants included both operational and strategic-level workers, such as local and state immunization officers. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (n = 12), key informant interviews (n = 12), and focus group discussions (n = 12; 147 discussants). Data collection was conducted from May to July 2023, and each interview lasted about 35 min. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded inductively, and analyzed thematically. The National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (NHREC/01/01/2007) approved the study.ResultsCampaign workers generally perceived digital payments as supporting their satisfaction, motivation, and willingness to perform assigned campaign activities compared with cash payments. Digital payments were valued for their transparency, direct funds transfer, timeliness, reduced intermediary involvement, and lower travel-related costs. Participants also described challenges, including delayed payments due to incorrect account information, difficulty resolving transaction problems, limited access to smartphones or bank accounts, and unstable internet connectivity, particularly in rural areas. Some participants therefore continued to prefer cash because it provided more immediate access to funds and depended less on digital infrastructure.ConclusionDigital payments were beneficial when remuneration was timely, accurate, and transparent, but depended on reliable implementation and infrastructure. Strengthening account verification, providing timely mechanisms for resolving payment problems, improving user training, and ensuring reliable connectivity may improve payment experiences and support health workers’ motivation and perceived work performance.
SN - 2673-253X
ER -