Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS Digital Health

The world’s oldest living culture leads the way with interpretable generative AI: Aboriginal women shaping the future of perinatal mental health services

4 affiliations
  1. 1School of Information Technology, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  2. 2Ngangk Yira Institute for Change, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  3. 3School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  4. 4Global Health Academy and Academy of Sport, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Abstract

Despite their strengths, Aboriginal mothers experience significant health disparities, including perinatal mental health challenges influenced by social, historical, and cultural determinants. Routine risk screening informs follow-up care, yet conventional approaches often fail to address cultural considerations. The Baby Coming You Ready (BCYR) program provides a strengths-based, culturally adapted digital assessment designed to enhance perinatal mental health care. However, some clinicians continue to rely primarily on conventional risk scores, which can neglect broader contextual circumstances influencing Aboriginal mothers, including cultural strengths and protective factors, thereby limiting the program’s full impact. This exploratory model-development study examined whether generative AI data augmentation combined with an intrinsically interpretable machine-learning model could support culturally contextualised prediction of perinatal psychological distress among Aboriginal mothers. We analysed deidentified BCYR pilot data from 293 Aboriginal mothers across six Western Australian sites. After excluding five records with incomplete outcome data, the analytic dataset included 288 participants. Models were evaluated using repeated internal train-test splits, with synthetic data used only for training augmentation and performance assessed on held-out real test data. The highest internal performance was observed for the TVAE-augmented Explainable Boosting Machine at an augmentation ratio of 1.0, with an accuracy of 0.867, an F1 score of 0.817, and an AUC of 0.934. Model explanations identified self-blame, loneliness, family pride, day-to-day management, sleep, and related contextual factors as influential contributors to model-estimated risk. These explanations are intended as prompts for culturally safe discussion and clinical reflection. Findings suggest that interpretable generative AI may have potential to support culturally responsive perinatal mental health assessment. However, broader community-governed external validation and prospective clinical workflow evaluation are required before clinical implementation. Author summary: Perinatal mental health care for Aboriginal mothers should recognise their strengths, cultural context, family relationships, and lived experiences. Standard screening tools may overlook these important factors and may not support culturally safe conversations between Aboriginal mothers and health professionals. The Baby Coming You Ready program was developed to provide a strengths-based, culturally adapted digital assessment for Aboriginal families. However, the contextual and strengths-based information captured through BCYR may not always be fully incorporated into clinical interpretation. This exploratory model-development study examined whether generative and interpretable AI could support culturally contextualised prediction of perinatal psychological distress among Aboriginal mothers. We tested whether carefully augmented training data could support model development while retaining real participant data as the analysis foundation. We also used an intrinsically interpretable model so that the contributing factors could be examined. The best-performing model identified factors such as self-blame, loneliness, family pride, day-to-day management, sleep, and related contextual factors as important contributors to model-estimated psychological distress. The model explanations are intended as prompts for culturally safe discussion and clinical reflection, rather than to replace clinical judgement. However, this study remains exploratory, and further Aboriginal-led co-design, external validation, fairness assessment, and real-world evaluation are needed before clinical implementation.

Related

  1. The long-term course of perinatal anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Roberta Z. J. McGuinness, Nichole Fairbrother, Fiona L. Challacombe
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsPsychiatry & mental healthPLOS
  2. Machine learning and spatial regression approaches to estimating willingness to pay for ecosystem services in Jakarta and Taoyuan
    Shafira Wuryandani, Yu-Pin Lin, Pei-Chen Lin +2
    Ecosystem ServicesPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull text3 citedEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  3. Feedbacks between human behavior, disease transmission, and vector ecology generate culture-linked dynamics in vector-borne diseases
    Denis Tverskoi, Daniela Miteva, Bryce Morsky +1
    EcoEvoRxivPreprintPublisher termsFull textDynamical systemsEpidemiology & public healthEcoEvoRxiv
  4. On the Cardinality of the Smith Set Under Impartial Culture with Many Alternatives
    Zachary Berchenko, Kaizhao Liu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsProbabilityarXiv
  5. Mental Health Support Hotlines as Capacity-Limited Services: Joint Modeling of Demand, Assessment, and Unassessed Calls
    Siliang Zhang, Jing Ouyang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{wang2026worlds,
  title = {{The world’s oldest living culture leads the way with interpretable generative AI: Aboriginal women shaping the future of perinatal mental health services}},
  author = {Guanjin Wang and Hachem Bennamoun and Wai Hang Kwok and Rehan Raza and Ferdous Sohel and Bridgette Kelly and Trish Ratajczak and Corinne Reid and Rhonda Marriott and Roz Walker and Jayne Kotz and Tracy Reibel},
  journal = {PLOS Digital Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pdig.0001709},
  url = {https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001709},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The world’s oldest living culture leads the way with interpretable generative AI: Aboriginal women shaping the future of perinatal mental health services
AU  - Guanjin Wang
AU  - Hachem Bennamoun
AU  - Wai Hang Kwok
AU  - Rehan Raza
AU  - Ferdous Sohel
AU  - Bridgette Kelly
AU  - Trish Ratajczak
AU  - Corinne Reid
AU  - Rhonda Marriott
AU  - Roz Walker
AU  - Jayne Kotz
AU  - Tracy Reibel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - PLOS Digital Health
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001709
UR  - https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001709
AB  - Despite their strengths, Aboriginal mothers experience significant health disparities, including perinatal mental health challenges influenced by social, historical, and cultural determinants. Routine risk screening informs follow-up care, yet conventional approaches often fail to address cultural considerations. The Baby Coming You Ready (BCYR) program provides a strengths-based, culturally adapted digital assessment designed to enhance perinatal mental health care. However, some clinicians continue to rely primarily on conventional risk scores, which can neglect broader contextual circumstances influencing Aboriginal mothers, including cultural strengths and protective factors, thereby limiting the program’s full impact. This exploratory model-development study examined whether generative AI data augmentation combined with an intrinsically interpretable machine-learning model could support culturally contextualised prediction of perinatal psychological distress among Aboriginal mothers. We analysed deidentified BCYR pilot data from 293 Aboriginal mothers across six Western Australian sites. After excluding five records with incomplete outcome data, the analytic dataset included 288 participants. Models were evaluated using repeated internal train-test splits, with synthetic data used only for training augmentation and performance assessed on held-out real test data. The highest internal performance was observed for the TVAE-augmented Explainable Boosting Machine at an augmentation ratio of 1.0, with an accuracy of 0.867, an F1 score of 0.817, and an AUC of 0.934. Model explanations identified self-blame, loneliness, family pride, day-to-day management, sleep, and related contextual factors as influential contributors to model-estimated risk. These explanations are intended as prompts for culturally safe discussion and clinical reflection. Findings suggest that interpretable generative AI may have potential to support culturally responsive perinatal mental health assessment. However, broader community-governed external validation and prospective clinical workflow evaluation are required before clinical implementation. Author summary: Perinatal mental health care for Aboriginal mothers should recognise their strengths, cultural context, family relationships, and lived experiences. Standard screening tools may overlook these important factors and may not support culturally safe conversations between Aboriginal mothers and health professionals. The Baby Coming You Ready program was developed to provide a strengths-based, culturally adapted digital assessment for Aboriginal families. However, the contextual and strengths-based information captured through BCYR may not always be fully incorporated into clinical interpretation. This exploratory model-development study examined whether generative and interpretable AI could support culturally contextualised prediction of perinatal psychological distress among Aboriginal mothers. We tested whether carefully augmented training data could support model development while retaining real participant data as the analysis foundation. We also used an intrinsically interpretable model so that the contributing factors could be examined. The best-performing model identified factors such as self-blame, loneliness, family pride, day-to-day management, sleep, and related contextual factors as important contributors to model-estimated psychological distress. The model explanations are intended as prompts for culturally safe discussion and clinical reflection, rather than to replace clinical judgement. However, this study remains exploratory, and further Aboriginal-led co-design, external validation, fairness assessment, and real-world evaluation are needed before clinical implementation.
SN  - 2767-3170
ER  -