PK/PD-integrated Bayesian platform design for phase II dose regimen optimization
Abstract
Early-phase dose-finding methods increasingly assess toxicity and efficacy jointly, but comparisons based only on administered dose may inadequately characterize regimens differing in schedule. We developed a Bayesian phase II adaptive platform design for regimen optimization that integrates pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling into toxicity, efficacy, regimen selection and adaptation decisions. The proposed PK/PD-informed Regimen Optimization Platform (PROP) design uses a population PK/PD model to generate patient- and population-level predictions of exposure and biological activity. Acute and cumulative toxicities are analysed using a discrete-time time-to-event model informed by PK exposure. Efficacy is evaluated through Bayesian model averaging of exposure-driven and biomarker-driven time-to-event models. The design supports regimen graduation, discontinuation for futility or safety, and addition of unexplored regimens. Performance was evaluated through simulations motivated by an influenza intensive-care setting. Across six scenarios, PROP generally improved graduation and futility decisions, reduced inappropriate graduation, and supported the addition of promising regimens compared with dose-based alternatives. It also more accurately estimated regimen-specific toxicity and arm-specific efficacy, while the model-averaging framework favored the efficacy model consistent with the data-generating mechanism. Dose-based approaches performed better for safety stopping in some scenarios, despite less accurate characterization of the regimen--toxicity relationship. PK/PD-informed platform designs can improve adaptive regimen selection and knowledge generation when dose alone cannot adequately characterize treatment regimens.
Related
- Transfer learning in bayesian optimization for aircraft design
- Portfolio-Based Constrained Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization for Materials Design
- A hybrid approach for steady-state production optimization of a real oil and gas platform: Integrating physics-based models, machine learning techniques, and field monitoring signals
- Pre-training of Bayesian Optimization Algorithm through Bayesian Optimization
- Energy-aware frugal Bayesian optimization
BibTeX
@misc{vuorinen2026pkpdintegrated,
title = {{PK/PD-integrated Bayesian platform design for phase II dose regimen optimization}},
author = {Axel Vuorinen and Antoine Guillon and Emmanuelle Comets and Moreno Ursino},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.30072},
eprint = {2609.30072},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30072},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - PK/PD-integrated Bayesian platform design for phase II dose regimen optimization
AU - Axel Vuorinen
AU - Antoine Guillon
AU - Emmanuelle Comets
AU - Moreno Ursino
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/25
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.30072
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30072
AB - Early-phase dose-finding methods increasingly assess toxicity and efficacy jointly, but comparisons based only on administered dose may inadequately characterize regimens differing in schedule. We developed a Bayesian phase II adaptive platform design for regimen optimization that integrates pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling into toxicity, efficacy, regimen selection and adaptation decisions. The proposed PK/PD-informed Regimen Optimization Platform (PROP) design uses a population PK/PD model to generate patient- and population-level predictions of exposure and biological activity. Acute and cumulative toxicities are analysed using a discrete-time time-to-event model informed by PK exposure. Efficacy is evaluated through Bayesian model averaging of exposure-driven and biomarker-driven time-to-event models. The design supports regimen graduation, discontinuation for futility or safety, and addition of unexplored regimens. Performance was evaluated through simulations motivated by an influenza intensive-care setting. Across six scenarios, PROP generally improved graduation and futility decisions, reduced inappropriate graduation, and supported the addition of promising regimens compared with dose-based alternatives. It also more accurately estimated regimen-specific toxicity and arm-specific efficacy, while the model-averaging framework favored the efficacy model consistent with the data-generating mechanism. Dose-based approaches performed better for safety stopping in some scenarios, despite less accurate characterization of the regimen--toxicity relationship. PK/PD-informed platform designs can improve adaptive regimen selection and knowledge generation when dose alone cannot adequately characterize treatment regimens.
ER -