Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

The Intellectual Justice Scale: Measuring How Fairly People Engage With Knowledge

Abstract

Intellectual justice, the disposition to engage fairly with knowledge and those who produce it, has received growing attention in philosophy and education, yet no validated self-report measure exists. We developed and validated the Intellectual Justice Scale (IJS), a 9-item measure with three factors (Testimonial Justice, Hermeneutical Justice, and Intellectual Action) grounded in Fricker’s framework of intellectual injustice. An initial item pool was refined through expert review and pilot testing. In Study 1 (N = 404), exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure, with independent statistical and conceptual item selection converging on the same nine items. In Study 2 (N = 401), confirmatory factor analysis supported good model fit, and the IJS showed expected associations with intellectual humility, personality traits, and social justice attitudes while remaining empirically distinguishable from each. These findings offer the first validated self-report measure of intellectual justice attitudes, providing researchers with a tool to study individual differences.

Related

  1. Criminal Justice Risk Assessments with Unreliable Class Assignments
    Richard Berk
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Training Mathematicians in the Age of AI: Intellectual Agency, Cognitive Offloading, and the PhD Thesis
    Thomas Koberda
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Multiplex coupling: Connecting the intellectual base and the topics of a research field
    Massimo Aria, Corrado Cuccurullo, Maria Spano
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. University Research and Leadership in the Age of AI: Mobilizing Intellectual Capacity and Building the Infrastructure for Discovery
    Bacim Alali
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  5. Measuring evidence against exchangeability and group invariance with E-values
    Nick W. Koning
    The Annals of StatisticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text17 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{daamen2026intellectual,
  title = {{The Intellectual Justice Scale: Measuring How Fairly People Engage With Knowledge}},
  author = {Yara Daamen and Vlasta Sikimić and Daniel Lakens},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/buhyd_v3},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/buhyd_v3/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The Intellectual Justice Scale: Measuring How Fairly People Engage With Knowledge
AU  - Yara Daamen
AU  - Vlasta Sikimić
AU  - Daniel Lakens
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/02
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/buhyd_v3
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/buhyd_v3/
AB  - Intellectual justice, the disposition to engage fairly with knowledge and those who produce it, has received growing attention in philosophy and education, yet no validated self-report measure exists. We developed and validated the Intellectual Justice Scale (IJS), a 9-item measure with three factors (Testimonial Justice, Hermeneutical Justice, and Intellectual Action) grounded in Fricker’s framework of intellectual injustice. An initial item pool was refined through expert review and pilot testing. In Study 1 (N = 404), exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure, with independent statistical and conceptual item selection converging on the same nine items. In Study 2 (N = 401), confirmatory factor analysis supported good model fit, and the IJS showed expected associations with intellectual humility, personality traits, and social justice attitudes while remaining empirically distinguishable from each. These findings offer the first validated self-report measure of intellectual justice attitudes, providing researchers with a tool to study individual differences.
ER  -