Who is disrupting whom? Examining the nighttime activity patterns of humans and their dogs
- 1Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 2Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- 3Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Abstract
Few studies have examined the nighttime dynamic between humans and dogs, but existing research suggests dogs can disrupt human sleep. In this study, we examined the nighttime activity of 25 Canadian participants, totaling 38 human-dog pairs using accelerometers and survey data. We used linear mixed effects models to assess the drivers of variability in both human sleep and dog nighttime activity, and a generalized linear model to assess the effects of demographic variables on self-reported sleep quality. None of the variables significantly affected objective sleep measures in humans or dog nighttime activity. Dog sleeping location did not affect human perceived sleep quality, but having multiple dogs was associated with poorer subjective sleep (p = 0.042). Human and dog nighttime activities were found to be significantly correlated. Additionally, we conducted a time series analysis to determine lagged correlations between human and dog activities within five minutes. Among the 61% dyads that showed correlation in activity states, human activity preceding dog activity (45%) occurred more often than dog activity preceding human activity (18%). In 36% of dyads, activity was synchronized within the same 1-minute period. Overall, co-sleeping (i.e., bedsharing) had no effect on sleep duration or efficiency in humans or nighttime activity in dogs. The only significant predictor we found was the presence of other dogs, which affected subjective but not objective human sleep quality, revealing a discrepancy between self-reported and objectively measured sleep. Both humans and their dogs impact the nighttime activity of one another, demonstrating our species’ inseparable and reciprocal relationship.
Related
- The Pseudomonas protegens PBL3 secretome exerts antimicrobial activity against Burkholderia glumae by disrupting cell envelope homeostasis and impairing bacterial replication
- Disrupting the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus Increases Social Brain Activity During Emotion Recognition
- Distinct millisecond-scale click-train patterns evoke discriminable behavioral and neural responses in humans and rats
- Walking delays auditory processing in humans alongside a global shift in aperiodic neural activity
- Translating functional brain activity between humans and monkeys
BibTeX
@article{li2026disrupting,
title = {{Who is disrupting whom? Examining the nighttime activity patterns of humans and their dogs}},
author = {Ming Fei Li and Lavania Nagendran and Christopher Kiru and Lauren Schroeder and David R. Samson},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358453},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358453},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Who is disrupting whom? Examining the nighttime activity patterns of humans and their dogs
AU - Ming Fei Li
AU - Lavania Nagendran
AU - Christopher Kiru
AU - Lauren Schroeder
AU - David R. Samson
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358453
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358453
AB - Few studies have examined the nighttime dynamic between humans and dogs, but existing research suggests dogs can disrupt human sleep. In this study, we examined the nighttime activity of 25 Canadian participants, totaling 38 human-dog pairs using accelerometers and survey data. We used linear mixed effects models to assess the drivers of variability in both human sleep and dog nighttime activity, and a generalized linear model to assess the effects of demographic variables on self-reported sleep quality. None of the variables significantly affected objective sleep measures in humans or dog nighttime activity. Dog sleeping location did not affect human perceived sleep quality, but having multiple dogs was associated with poorer subjective sleep (p = 0.042). Human and dog nighttime activities were found to be significantly correlated. Additionally, we conducted a time series analysis to determine lagged correlations between human and dog activities within five minutes. Among the 61% dyads that showed correlation in activity states, human activity preceding dog activity (45%) occurred more often than dog activity preceding human activity (18%). In 36% of dyads, activity was synchronized within the same 1-minute period. Overall, co-sleeping (i.e., bedsharing) had no effect on sleep duration or efficiency in humans or nighttime activity in dogs. The only significant predictor we found was the presence of other dogs, which affected subjective but not objective human sleep quality, revealing a discrepancy between self-reported and objectively measured sleep. Both humans and their dogs impact the nighttime activity of one another, demonstrating our species’ inseparable and reciprocal relationship.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -