Divergent Rehabilitation Targets in Pediatric Cerebral Palsy: Asymmetry-Bounded Versus Symmetry-Disrupting Strategies in Hemiplegic and Diplegic Gait.
- 1Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Agrifood and Environmental, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania.
- 2Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Romanian-American University, Exhibition Boulevard No. 1B, Sector 1, 012101 Bucharest, Romania.
Abstract
Rehabilitation for gait asymmetry in cerebral palsy (CP) commonly treats improvements in gait symmetry indices as a subtype-general marker of therapeutic success. Building on a trajectory-divergence model developed in a companion review, we propose that hemiplegic (unilateral spastic) and diplegic (bilateral spastic) CP-using Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE) nomenclature-represent opposing developmental deviations from the normative gait symmetry trajectory-persistent, actively regulated compensatory asymmetry in hemiplegia versus pathological rigid symmetry in diplegia-such that a single, shared correction target is conceptually misaligned for at least one subtype. This review critically evaluates, through a narrative synthesis of literature published between 2010 and 2026, whether rehabilitation strategies for hemiplegic and diplegic CP should be differentiated according to this model rather than converging on gait symmetry restoration. A structured narrative review was conducted following a Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework, drawing on 70 unique sources originally identified through 21 structured search queries organized into ten thematic groups, supplemented by four additional sources incorporated during peer review. In hemiplegic CP, compensatory asymmetry is mechanistically and energetically dissociable from correction, but its magnitude, not its presence, predicts balance and locomotor outcomes, bounding rather than eliminating the case for conservation. In diplegic CP, restoring adaptive motor variability is supported by convergent evidence but is conditional on confirming genuine bilateral rigidity, since a meaningful subset of diagnosed diplegic children presents with clinically significant inter-limb asymmetry. A provisional Divergent Rehabilitation Response Framework (DRRF) organizes four domains of subtype-specific therapeutic congruence: counter-evidence, such as correction-beneficial cases, inconsistent functional transfer, evidentiary concentration, and long-term musculoskeletal risk signals, are directly addressed. Differentiated magnitude- and subtype-conditional rehabilitation targets, rather than universal symmetrization, are proposed for hemiplegic and diplegic CP, alongside an explicit research agenda.
Related
- Comparative Genomic and Epigenetic Landscape of Histone H3.3 G34R and K27M-Mutated Pediatric High-Grade Glioma Suggests Divergent Precision Oncology Strategies
- Comparison of fascial thickness in hemiplegic and non-hemiplegic upper extremities with ultrasonographic imaging: a cross-sectional study.
- Integrative ALS therapy: gene targeted therapy by base editing and potential exercise rehabilitation as synergistic strategies for functional recovery
- The Same, but Different: Shared Hallmarks and Divergent Drivers in Adult, Pediatric and Canine Glioma.
- Rehabilitation in Pediatric Patients with Acute and Subacute Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review on Non-Pharmacological Interventions
BibTeX
@article{dominteanu2026divergent,
title = {{Divergent Rehabilitation Targets in Pediatric Cerebral Palsy: Asymmetry-Bounded Versus Symmetry-Disrupting Strategies in Hemiplegic and Diplegic Gait.}},
author = {Teodora Dominteanu and Marius Dumitru Dima and Amelia Elena Stan and Andreea Voinea},
journal = {Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.3390/jfmk11040376},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924655},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Divergent Rehabilitation Targets in Pediatric Cerebral Palsy: Asymmetry-Bounded Versus Symmetry-Disrupting Strategies in Hemiplegic and Diplegic Gait.
AU - Teodora Dominteanu
AU - Marius Dumitru Dima
AU - Amelia Elena Stan
AU - Andreea Voinea
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/22
JO - Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology
DO - 10.3390/jfmk11040376
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924655
AB - Rehabilitation for gait asymmetry in cerebral palsy (CP) commonly treats improvements in gait symmetry indices as a subtype-general marker of therapeutic success. Building on a trajectory-divergence model developed in a companion review, we propose that hemiplegic (unilateral spastic) and diplegic (bilateral spastic) CP-using Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE) nomenclature-represent opposing developmental deviations from the normative gait symmetry trajectory-persistent, actively regulated compensatory asymmetry in hemiplegia versus pathological rigid symmetry in diplegia-such that a single, shared correction target is conceptually misaligned for at least one subtype. This review critically evaluates, through a narrative synthesis of literature published between 2010 and 2026, whether rehabilitation strategies for hemiplegic and diplegic CP should be differentiated according to this model rather than converging on gait symmetry restoration. A structured narrative review was conducted following a Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework, drawing on 70 unique sources originally identified through 21 structured search queries organized into ten thematic groups, supplemented by four additional sources incorporated during peer review. In hemiplegic CP, compensatory asymmetry is mechanistically and energetically dissociable from correction, but its magnitude, not its presence, predicts balance and locomotor outcomes, bounding rather than eliminating the case for conservation. In diplegic CP, restoring adaptive motor variability is supported by convergent evidence but is conditional on confirming genuine bilateral rigidity, since a meaningful subset of diagnosed diplegic children presents with clinically significant inter-limb asymmetry. A provisional Divergent Rehabilitation Response Framework (DRRF) organizes four domains of subtype-specific therapeutic congruence: counter-evidence, such as correction-beneficial cases, inconsistent functional transfer, evidentiary concentration, and long-term musculoskeletal risk signals, are directly addressed. Differentiated magnitude- and subtype-conditional rehabilitation targets, rather than universal symmetrization, are proposed for hemiplegic and diplegic CP, alongside an explicit research agenda.
SN - 2411-5142
ER -