Can't win, don't try: handling time costs affect foraging choices and vigilance in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)
- 1Western University
Abstract
Resource handling time is an important cost to foraging animals and this is especially true for low-ranking individuals who may be displaced before they acquire rewards. Handling may also require visual attention that can lead to a trade-off between scanning the environment and focusing on food acquisition. We ran a foraging experiment on wild vervet monkeys where we simultaneously offered them three puzzle boxes in a straight-line array that increased sequentially in handling difficulty and reward value. We found that differences in competitive ability had a large impact on access to long-handling time resources and willingness to invest time in costly problem-solving when social interference was possible. Resources with lower handling time and smaller rewards were accessed by individuals of all dominance ranks but only dominant monkeys that did not fear displacement attempted the high handling time puzzle box. Handling time improved with experience at each puzzle box and contrary to predictions, when vigilance rates were higher, monkeys were also faster at solving puzzle boxes. Thus, there is not necessarily a trade-off between attention to foraging tasks that require handling and vigilance, if a high scanning frequency to both can be balanced with limited scanning duration. These results have important implications for understanding the decision-making of foraging animals that live in competitive groups and the diets of individuals, which may vary with dominance when important resources require long handling times.
Related
- Who takes the risk to forage? Testing consistent inter-individual behavioural variation in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)
- Dynamics of zoonotic soil-transmitted helminth infections in wild African green monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus)
- Troisièmes rencontres d’allergo-vigilance – Paris 5/12/2025
- Defining a Clinically Meaningful Within-Person Change Threshold for the Psychomotor Vigilance Test in Narcolepsy Type 1
- Physiological Oscillations of Lateral Ventricular Volume Revealed by Fast fMRI: Effects of Aging and Vigilance
BibTeX
@misc{kang2026cant,
title = {{Can't win, don't try: handling time costs affect foraging choices and vigilance in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)}},
author = {A. S. Kang and W. Mutebi and J. A. Teichroeb},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.16.752153},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.16.752153v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Can't win, don't try: handling time costs affect foraging choices and vigilance in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)
AU - A. S. Kang
AU - W. Mutebi
AU - J. A. Teichroeb
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/16
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.16.752153
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.16.752153v1
AB - Resource handling time is an important cost to foraging animals and this is especially true for low-ranking individuals who may be displaced before they acquire rewards. Handling may also require visual attention that can lead to a trade-off between scanning the environment and focusing on food acquisition. We ran a foraging experiment on wild vervet monkeys where we simultaneously offered them three puzzle boxes in a straight-line array that increased sequentially in handling difficulty and reward value. We found that differences in competitive ability had a large impact on access to long-handling time resources and willingness to invest time in costly problem-solving when social interference was possible. Resources with lower handling time and smaller rewards were accessed by individuals of all dominance ranks but only dominant monkeys that did not fear displacement attempted the high handling time puzzle box. Handling time improved with experience at each puzzle box and contrary to predictions, when vigilance rates were higher, monkeys were also faster at solving puzzle boxes. Thus, there is not necessarily a trade-off between attention to foraging tasks that require handling and vigilance, if a high scanning frequency to both can be balanced with limited scanning duration. These results have important implications for understanding the decision-making of foraging animals that live in competitive groups and the diets of individuals, which may vary with dominance when important resources require long handling times.
ER -