PFAS Toxicity: What’s True, What’s Not, and What Really Matters
19 affiliations
- 1Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology
- 2Oregon State University
- 3Department of Environmental Science
- 4Stockholm University
- 5Milieu Consulting SPRL
- 6NILU, Tromsø 9296, Norway and Division of Environmental Health
- 7Norwegian Institute of Public Health
- 8Graduate School of Oceanography
- 9University of Rhode Island
- 10National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- 11U.S. Public Health Service
- 12Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Environmental and Occupational Health
- 13University of Pittsburgh
- 14Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich
- 15Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Section for Environmental Chemistry and Physics
- 16University of Copenhagen
- 17Empa-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St., St. Gallen, CH 9014, Switzerland
- 18National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) Catalysis
- 19University of Southern Denmark, Department of Green Technology & Danish Institute for Advanced Study (DIAS)
Abstract
A substantial body of evidence exists demonstrating that exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) poses a risk to human health. Data from epidemiological studies of those exposed occupationally or environmentally demonstrate adverse health risks, and these health effects are concordant with data from toxicological studies. Systematic reviews, conducted by agencies, organizations, and independent scientists that synthesize and integrate these data streams, have concluded that a range of health risks arise from PFAS exposure, including different types of cancer, especially kidney and testicular cancer, metabolic alterations such as increased liver enzymes and increased cholesterol, immune dysfunction such as reduced vaccination efficiency, reproductive and developmental outcomes such as low birth weight and reduced duration of breast feeding, and forms of endocrine disruption. Despite this, myths and misinformation surrounding these health risks slow efforts to protect public health from the hazards of PFAS exposure. This work addresses the most predominant of these myths and counters them with accumulated evidence from epidemiological and toxicological studies, demonstrating that exposure to PFASs poses a risk to human health.
Related
- Impedance, admittance or current–voltage? What each measurement really tells about charge transport in deepblue hosts
- Evaluation of airborne PFAS concentrations in PFAS-using industrial facilities
- Do public records document PFAS drinking-water response handoffs? A 51-jurisdiction audit
- Overlooked Roles of Oxygen in PFAS Degradation by UV/Sulfite: Mechanistic Insights and Engineering Implications
- Near-infrared spectroscopy for rapid and non-destructive assessment of PFAS effects in blue mussels (Mytilus spp.): a proof-of-concept study
BibTeX
@article{dewitt2026pfas,
title = {{PFAS Toxicity: What’s True, What’s Not, and What Really Matters}},
author = {Jamie C. DeWitt and Ian T. Cousins and Gretta Goldenman and Dorte Herzke and Rainer Lohmann and Mark Miller and Carla A. Ng and Martin Scheringer and Xenia Trier and Zhanyun Wang},
journal = {Environmental Science \& Technology},
year = {2026},
month = may,
doi = {10.1021/acs.est.6c01037},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c01037},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - PFAS Toxicity: What’s True, What’s Not, and What Really Matters
AU - Jamie C. DeWitt
AU - Ian T. Cousins
AU - Gretta Goldenman
AU - Dorte Herzke
AU - Rainer Lohmann
AU - Mark Miller
AU - Carla A. Ng
AU - Martin Scheringer
AU - Xenia Trier
AU - Zhanyun Wang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/05/18
JO - Environmental Science & Technology
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.6c01037
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c01037
AB - A substantial body of evidence exists demonstrating that exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) poses a risk to human health. Data from epidemiological studies of those exposed occupationally or environmentally demonstrate adverse health risks, and these health effects are concordant with data from toxicological studies. Systematic reviews, conducted by agencies, organizations, and independent scientists that synthesize and integrate these data streams, have concluded that a range of health risks arise from PFAS exposure, including different types of cancer, especially kidney and testicular cancer, metabolic alterations such as increased liver enzymes and increased cholesterol, immune dysfunction such as reduced vaccination efficiency, reproductive and developmental outcomes such as low birth weight and reduced duration of breast feeding, and forms of endocrine disruption. Despite this, myths and misinformation surrounding these health risks slow efforts to protect public health from the hazards of PFAS exposure. This work addresses the most predominant of these myths and counters them with accumulated evidence from epidemiological and toxicological studies, demonstrating that exposure to PFASs poses a risk to human health.
SN - 0013-936X
SN - 1520-5851
ER -