Health-Related Generative AI Use Alongside and Beyond Professional Care: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Reddit Posts.
- 1Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.
Abstract
Background/objectives
This study examined naturally occurring Reddit posts describing health-related generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in relation to professional care.Methods
Of 1822 posts retrieved from two Reddit communities, r/AskDocs and r/ChatGPT (1 November 2024 to 30 October 2025), 291 met the inclusion criteria. Inductive qualitative content analysis generated 47 final codes and five themes. Coding was primarily conducted by one researcher, with team review of boundary cases and independent coding of a random subset.Results
Users described practical, emotional, and relational uses. GenAI use occurred before, in preparation for, and after professional care, and sometimes in lieu of care when care was inaccessible or not pursued. Accounts of diagnostic testing included clinician-informed, clinician-mediated, and independently obtained testing. Users also described concerns about disclosing GenAI use, conflicting information from cross-checking, and barriers to acting on GenAI's advice to seek care.Conclusions
Clinical and system responses should support discussion of AI-informed concerns and shared decision-making, recognize the clinical work involved in assessing and responding to AI-informed test requests, clarify follow-up pathways after independently obtained test results, and account for barriers to acting on care recommendations.
Related
- Perspectives of those with lived and professional experience on vision rehabilitation and related supports in Ghana: a descriptive qualitative study
- 'Let's work alongside it': healthcare professionals' perspectives of generative AI in supporting care at home in paediatric rheumatology.
- Patient expectations and healthcare professional education in obesity care: A comparative qualitative study
- Exploring Medical Professionals’ Perspectives on Cannabinoid Use in Professional and Elite-Level Contact Sports: A Qualitative Inquiry
- Stakeholder perspectives on sustainable antenatal point-of-care ultrasound (APOCUS) implementation in rural Australia: a qualitative study of professional body submissions and clinician focus groups.
BibTeX
@article{kim2026healthrelated,
title = {{Health-Related Generative AI Use Alongside and Beyond Professional Care: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Reddit Posts.}},
author = {Joomi Kim and Alex R Parkhouse and Ricky Leung},
journal = {Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/healthcare14203429},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42940474},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Health-Related Generative AI Use Alongside and Beyond Professional Care: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Reddit Posts.
AU - Joomi Kim
AU - Alex R Parkhouse
AU - Ricky Leung
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
JO - Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/healthcare14203429
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42940474
AB - Background/objectives This study examined naturally occurring Reddit posts describing health-related generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in relation to professional care.Methods Of 1822 posts retrieved from two Reddit communities, r/AskDocs and r/ChatGPT (1 November 2024 to 30 October 2025), 291 met the inclusion criteria. Inductive qualitative content analysis generated 47 final codes and five themes. Coding was primarily conducted by one researcher, with team review of boundary cases and independent coding of a random subset.Results Users described practical, emotional, and relational uses. GenAI use occurred before, in preparation for, and after professional care, and sometimes in lieu of care when care was inaccessible or not pursued. Accounts of diagnostic testing included clinician-informed, clinician-mediated, and independently obtained testing. Users also described concerns about disclosing GenAI use, conflicting information from cross-checking, and barriers to acting on GenAI's advice to seek care.Conclusions Clinical and system responses should support discussion of AI-informed concerns and shared decision-making, recognize the clinical work involved in assessing and responding to AI-informed test requests, clarify follow-up pathways after independently obtained test results, and account for barriers to acting on care recommendations.
SN - 2227-9032
ER -