Chemistry, Generative AI, and English: implications for chemistry researchers from diverse language backgrounds
Abstract
Background, context, purpose: English is essential in global science but poses challenges for researchers who speak it as an additional language (Eng+). We investigated how chemistry researchers’ language backgrounds shape their experiences and the impact(s) of digital tools, including generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). We administered a questionnaire to chemistry researchers having English-as-a-first (Eng1st) or English-as-an-additional (Eng+) language. Results, main findings: Both groups indicated that English proficiency is crucial for productivity, though Eng+ participants reported more difficulties. Eng+ participants viewed digital tools as more helpful, including GenAI, and primarily used for writing support. However, concerns about GenAI’s accuracy, ethics, and plagiarism risks were common. Some Eng+ researchers avoided over-relying on GenAI, preferring to improve their English skills. Few used GenAI beyond summaries and rephrasing/translation. Conclusions: This work is the first to identify how emerging technologies like GenAI are perceived and used by researchers from different language backgrounds, highlighting the potential to enhance equity and productivity for Eng+ scientists.
Related
- Built in Minutes, Checked by Script: Instructor-Made Interactive Chemistry Study Guides with Generative AI
- Escape Rooms, Arcades, and a Grain of Salt: Five Original Games for Introductory Chemistry, Built by One Instructor with Generative AI
- Robust generative transition-state models for unseen chemistry
- Integrating Generative AI and Data Science into General Chemistry Laboratories
- Quantifying Multi-Objective Optimization in Generative Chemistry for Molecule Design
BibTeX
@misc{deng2026chemistry,
title = {{Chemistry, Generative AI, and English: implications for chemistry researchers from diverse language backgrounds}},
author = {Jacky M. Deng and Makayla Dagenaus and Alison B. Flynn},
howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15009703/v1},
url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15009703/v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Chemistry, Generative AI, and English: implications for chemistry researchers from diverse language backgrounds
AU - Jacky M. Deng
AU - Makayla Dagenaus
AU - Alison B. Flynn
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
PB - ChemRxiv
DO - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15009703/v1
UR - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15009703/v1
AB - Background, context, purpose: English is essential in global science but poses challenges for researchers who speak it as an additional language (Eng+). We investigated how chemistry researchers’ language backgrounds shape their experiences and the impact(s) of digital tools, including generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). We administered a questionnaire to chemistry researchers having English-as-a-first (Eng1st) or English-as-an-additional (Eng+) language. Results, main findings: Both groups indicated that English proficiency is crucial for productivity, though Eng+ participants reported more difficulties. Eng+ participants viewed digital tools as more helpful, including GenAI, and primarily used for writing support. However, concerns about GenAI’s accuracy, ethics, and plagiarism risks were common. Some Eng+ researchers avoided over-relying on GenAI, preferring to improve their English skills. Few used GenAI beyond summaries and rephrasing/translation. Conclusions: This work is the first to identify how emerging technologies like GenAI are perceived and used by researchers from different language backgrounds, highlighting the potential to enhance equity and productivity for Eng+ scientists.
ER -