Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,546 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

A framework for trackable and modular rounding error analysis

Abstract

Robust and meaningful rounding error analysis is becoming increasingly challenging as modern numerical computations involve a rapidly evolving variety of arithmetic formats, precisions, and computational kernels. We propose a trackable and modular framework for rounding error analysis, together with a new notation for bounding accumulated rounding errors. The analysis is trackable in the sense that the origin and propagation of individual error terms remain explicit in the final result, and modular in the sense that local error bounds can be replaced according to the arithmetic, precision, or computational kernel without repeating the structural analysis. We also introduce the notation γn=(1−u)−n−1, which provides an alternative to the classical γnh=nu/(1−nu) notation. A key feature is that our notation does not require the restriction nu<1 and conveniently handles errors arising from division. Using block LU factorization as a representative example, we show that the framework distinguishes the error sources of different algorithmic variants and permits improved kernels, such as compensated summation and accurate matrix multiplication, to be incorporated directly into the resulting error bounds.

Related

  1. A posteriori error estimates for variational inequalities of the second kind in an abstract framework
    Lothar Banz, Miriam Schönauer, Andreas Schröder
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  2. ODAT-SE: A modular and parallel framework for simulation-based inverse problems
    Tatsumi Aoyama, Kazuyoshi Yoshimi, Yuichi Motoyama +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingCondensed matterarXiv
  3. A Deep Latent Variable Framework for Jointly Modeling Missingness, Measurement Error, and Heterogeneity
    Yasin Khadem Charvadeh, Grace Y. Yi, Mithat Gönen +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Asymptotic Rounding Laws for Optimal Thresholds in Secretary Problems
    Raúl Sánchez Galán
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryProbabilityarXiv
  5. AI-Integrated Computational Framework for Pronunciation Error Analysis Through Native–Learner Speech Comparison
    Hastha Sunardi, Rendra Gustriansyah, Fery Antony
    Journal of Information Systems and InformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{carson2026framework,
  title = {{A framework for trackable and modular rounding error analysis}},
  author = {Erin Carson and Yuxin Ma and Meiyue Shao},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.35420},
  eprint = {2610.35420},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35420},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A framework for trackable and modular rounding error analysis
AU  - Erin Carson
AU  - Yuxin Ma
AU  - Meiyue Shao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.35420
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35420
AB  - Robust and meaningful rounding error analysis is becoming increasingly challenging as modern numerical computations involve a rapidly evolving variety of arithmetic formats, precisions, and computational kernels. We propose a trackable and modular framework for rounding error analysis, together with a new notation for bounding accumulated rounding errors. The analysis is trackable in the sense that the origin and propagation of individual error terms remain explicit in the final result, and modular in the sense that local error bounds can be replaced according to the arithmetic, precision, or computational kernel without repeating the structural analysis. We also introduce the notation γ_n=(1−u)^−n−1, which provides an alternative to the classical γ_n^h=nu/(1−nu) notation. A key feature is that our notation does not require the restriction nu<1 and conveniently handles errors arising from division. Using block LU factorization as a representative example, we show that the framework distinguishes the error sources of different algorithmic variants and permits improved kernels, such as compensated summation and accurate matrix multiplication, to be incorporated directly into the resulting error bounds.
ER  -