Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

Learning from the Learner's Response: Bi-Objective Acquisition for Sparse Expert Supervision in Reinforcement Learning

  1. 1Arts et Métiers

Abstract

Sparse expert supervision can improve reinforcement learning, but deciding which

states are worth annotating remains difficult. Uncertainty identifies where a learner

is unsure, but does not directly identify where supervision will most strongly

change that learner. We introduce ALBERTA, a response-aware acquisition frame-

work that measures local policy and value changes produced by controlled expert

interventions, predicts those responses from pre-annotation signals, and selects

candidates in the resulting two-dimensional response space. A calibration set of

200 expert-labeled probes is used to learn response from policy entropy, historical

critic disagreement, and their interaction; Pareto selection then allocates a separate

121-state downstream budget. The response-aware branch therefore uses 321 ex-

pert labels in total, compared with 121 for the Random baseline. In a controlled

single-seed Atomic Chess experiment from a common RL10 branch point, the

Pareto branch achieves a higher mean game score than PPO-only at all four tested

evaluation temperatures, with smaller margins at higher temperatures, and shows

its largest margins over Random at lower temperatures. These results provide

evidence that learner response can be a useful acquisition target while exposing

substantial differences between policy and value responsiveness.

Related

  1. Network-Slice-AwareVNF Orchestration for Mission-Critical IoT in 6G Networks: A Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach
    Abdulrahman K. Alnaim, Ahmed M. Alwakeel
    Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  2. A hybrid reinforcement learning and Harris Hawks Optimization framework for multi-objective resource management in IIoT
    Suresh Dara, Mourad Elloumi, Mohan Allam +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCrossref
  3. AlphaPareto: Formulaic Alpha Discovery with LLM-Guided Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning
    Yingbo Zhao, Zeyu Yang, Zhoufan Zhu
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Evolution of fairness in multi-objective reinforcement learning framework
    Jingyi Zhang, Xin Ou, Guozhong Zheng +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Safe Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning: Zero Constraint Violation and Primal-Averaging Convergence
    Chenxi Li, Yao Shu, Siyang Gao +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{koza2026learning,
  title = {{Learning from the Learner's Response: Bi-Objective Acquisition for Sparse Expert Supervision in Reinforcement Learning}},
  author = {Tom Koza},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23416966},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23416966},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Learning from the Learner's Response: Bi-Objective Acquisition for Sparse Expert Supervision in Reinforcement Learning
AU  - Tom Koza
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23416966
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23416966
AB  - Sparse expert supervision can improve reinforcement learning, but deciding which  states are worth annotating remains difficult. Uncertainty identifies where a learner  is unsure, but does not directly identify where supervision will most strongly  change that learner. We introduce ALBERTA, a response-aware acquisition frame-  work that measures local policy and value changes produced by controlled expert  interventions, predicts those responses from pre-annotation signals, and selects  candidates in the resulting two-dimensional response space. A calibration set of  200 expert-labeled probes is used to learn response from policy entropy, historical  critic disagreement, and their interaction; Pareto selection then allocates a separate  121-state downstream budget. The response-aware branch therefore uses 321 ex-  pert labels in total, compared with 121 for the Random baseline. In a controlled  single-seed Atomic Chess experiment from a common RL10 branch point, the  Pareto branch achieves a higher mean game score than PPO-only at all four tested  evaluation temperatures, with smaller margins at higher temperatures, and shows  its largest margins over Random at lower temperatures. These results provide  evidence that learner response can be a useful acquisition target while exposing  substantial differences between policy and value responsiveness.
ER  -