Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
210,043 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Genetics

Who are my neighbors? Selection targets robustness to full replication events, not to individual mutations

Abstract

Theory predicts that populations should evolve mutational robustness—the ability to maintain a constant phenotype despite mutations. However, selection does not operate on individual mutations but on phenotypes resulting from entire replication events, which may involve a variable number of mutations. We therefore distinguish mutational robustness from replicative robustness, defined as the probability that a replication event produces similarly fit offspring. Mutational and replicative robustness may seem closely aligned at first sight, but we show with an evolutionary simulation model that they can be selected in opposite directions. Our results show that while genomes with high redundancy and/or large amounts of noncoding DNA are mutationally robust, they are replicatively fragile because their size increases the number of mutations per replication. This is especially relevant when genomes are at risk of severe disruption from chromosomal rearrangements. Our results expose limits of the fitness landscape metaphor in the context of robustness evolution: neutral plateaus may be mutationally robust but replicatively unstable and therefore disfavored by selection, whereas narrow peaks arising from densely encoded genomes can replicate more reliably. Our results identify replicative robustness as a distinct target of selection that depends not only on tolerance to individual mutations but also on their overall likelihood of occurring.

Versions

Related

  1. Who are my Neighbours? Selection Targets Robustness to Full Replication Events, Not to Individual Mutations
    J. Luiselli, G. Beslon, P. van den Berg
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull text1 citedEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  2. Mutations in VP1 and 3A proteins improve binding and replication of rhinovirus C15 in HeLa-E8 cells
    Y. A. Bochkov, K. Watters, S. Basnet +4
    VirologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text41 citedMicrobiologyHAL
  3. PRNP mutations initially generate an alternatively misfolded PrP species that dissuades prion replication
    G. Amano, H. Arshad, S. Mehra +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Multi-Trait Phenotypic and SSR-Based Genetic Diversity Assessment of Individual Plants for Parental Selection in Turf-Type Tall Fescue
    Sinem Zere Taskın, Fikret Yonter, Sevin Teoman Duran +2
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  5. Mutations in the macrodomain 1 of nsp3 attenuate PEDV virulence in vivo without impairing in vitro replication
    Mingde Liu, Men Thi Hoai Duong, Thamonpan Laocharoensuk +4
    Journal of VirologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textZoology & animal behaviourPMC
BibTeX
@article{luiselli2026neighbors,
  title = {{Who are my neighbors? Selection targets robustness to full replication events, not to individual mutations}},
  author = {Juliette Luiselli and Guillaume Beslon and Pieter van den Berg},
  journal = {Genetics},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1093/genetics/iyag260},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05856893v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Who are my neighbors? Selection targets robustness to full replication events, not to individual mutations
AU  - Juliette Luiselli
AU  - Guillaume Beslon
AU  - Pieter van den Berg
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
JO  - Genetics
DO  - 10.1093/genetics/iyag260
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05856893v1
AB  - Theory predicts that populations should evolve mutational robustness—the ability to maintain a constant phenotype despite mutations. However, selection does not operate on individual mutations but on phenotypes resulting from entire replication events, which may involve a variable number of mutations. We therefore distinguish mutational robustness from replicative robustness, defined as the probability that a replication event produces similarly fit offspring. Mutational and replicative robustness may seem closely aligned at first sight, but we show with an evolutionary simulation model that they can be selected in opposite directions. Our results show that while genomes with high redundancy and/or large amounts of noncoding DNA are mutationally robust, they are replicatively fragile because their size increases the number of mutations per replication. This is especially relevant when genomes are at risk of severe disruption from chromosomal rearrangements. Our results expose limits of the fitness landscape metaphor in the context of robustness evolution: neutral plateaus may be mutationally robust but replicatively unstable and therefore disfavored by selection, whereas narrow peaks arising from densely encoded genomes can replicate more reliably. Our results identify replicative robustness as a distinct target of selection that depends not only on tolerance to individual mutations but also on their overall likelihood of occurring.
SN  - 1943-2631
ER  -