Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Comparison of eating timing metrics between a web-based dietary record and a dietitian-led interview

Abstract

Background: Eating timing metrics are increasingly linked to chronic disease outcomes. However, the ability of web-based dietary records to capture these metrics in largescale studies has not been evaluated. Therefore, we aimed to assess agreement of eating timing metrics between the web-based 24-hr dietary record of the French NutriNet-Santé e-cohort, and an interview-based 24-hr recall.

Methods: In 2009, participants (N = 139, mean age=60.9±5.9y) completed a web-based record on a pre-arranged date, followed the next day by a dietitian-led phone interview using the same web interface to conduct a 24-hr recall. We computed the timing of the first and last eating occasions, the number of eating occasions, and the timing of the caloric midpoint. Agreement was assessed using the: (1) Wilcoxon signed-rank test, (2) intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and (3) Spearman’s rank correlation, in the full sample and stratified by sex, age, body mass index, educational level, and computer knowledge.

Results: Agreement between the two methods was high for the timing of the first and last eating occasions (Wilcoxon P ≥ 0.53; ICCs = 0.85-0.90; Spearman’s correlation coefficients = 0.86-0.95). For the number of eating occasions, agreement was moderate, but acceptable; fewer eating occasions were reported in the web-based record than in the interview-based recall (mean difference = -0.36; Wilcoxon P < 0.001), and the ICC and Spearman’s correlation coefficient were 0.72 and 0.70, respectively. Agreement for the caloric midpoint was similar (Wilcoxon P = 0.68; ICC = 0.65; Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.68). Stratified analyses showed higher agreements for the number of eating occasions and caloric midpoint among women and adults aged <60 years.

Conclusions: Eating timing metrics showed good to excellent agreement between a web-based 24-hr dietary record and an interview-based 24-hr recall. The NutriNet-Santé dietary records are an effective tool for assessing eating timing.

Key messages: • A web-based dietary record showed good agreement with an interview-based recall for eating timing metrics.

• Web-based 24-hr dietary records are effective tools to assess eating timing in largescale populations.

Related

  1. Knowing Is Not Eating: Child-Reported Food Perception Versus Actual Dietary Intake in Southern Peru
    Karina Eduardo, Erick Saldaña, Leon Cutipa
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  2. Eating Behaviors, Dietary Patterns and Diet Quality in Newly Diagnosed, Treatment-Naïve Children with ADHD: An Age- and Sex-Matched Case–Control Study
    Nilüfer Şen, Nilüfer Acar Tek
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  3. Compatibility of the food compass with dietary indices and sustainable eating behaviors: toward a multidimensional assessment tool
    Nazlıcan Erdoğan Gövez, Emine Özdemir, Vesile Dinç +2
    Journal of Health, Population and NutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  4. Effects of eating behavior patterns and dietary habits on the therapeutic efficacy of Parkinson’s disease medications: from phenomena, mechanisms to clinical applications
    Jingyi Ye, Sarena Jiayao Zhang, Jinzhe Guan +10
    Frontiers in nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  5. Virtual Reality as a Tool for Post‑Concussion Cognitive Assessment: A Pilot Comparison of Reaction Time Metrics
    François Ji, Thomas Provot, Abdelmajid Kadri +3
    Multidisciplinary Biomechanics JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthHAL
BibTeX
@article{guyonnet2026comparison,
  title = {{Comparison of eating timing metrics between a web-based dietary record and a dietitian-led interview}},
  author = {E Guyonnet and E Obeid and V Desplats and S Péneau and C Julia and A Bellicha and E Kesse-Guyot and S Hercberg and M Touvier and B Srour},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1315},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1315},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of eating timing metrics between a web-based dietary record and a dietitian-led interview
AU  - E Guyonnet
AU  - E Obeid
AU  - V Desplats
AU  - S Péneau
AU  - C Julia
AU  - A Bellicha
AU  - E Kesse-Guyot
AU  - S Hercberg
AU  - M Touvier
AU  - B Srour
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1315
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1315
AB  - Background: Eating timing metrics are increasingly linked to chronic disease outcomes. However, the ability of web-based dietary records to capture these metrics in largescale studies has not been evaluated. Therefore, we aimed to assess agreement of eating timing metrics between the web-based 24-hr dietary record of the French NutriNet-Santé e-cohort, and an interview-based 24-hr recall.  Methods: In 2009, participants (N = 139, mean age=60.9±5.9y) completed a web-based record on a pre-arranged date, followed the next day by a dietitian-led phone interview using the same web interface to conduct a 24-hr recall. We computed the timing of the first and last eating occasions, the number of eating occasions, and the timing of the caloric midpoint. Agreement was assessed using the: (1) Wilcoxon signed-rank test, (2) intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and (3) Spearman’s rank correlation, in the full sample and stratified by sex, age, body mass index, educational level, and computer knowledge.  Results: Agreement between the two methods was high for the timing of the first and last eating occasions (Wilcoxon P ≥ 0.53; ICCs = 0.85-0.90; Spearman’s correlation coefficients = 0.86-0.95). For the number of eating occasions, agreement was moderate, but acceptable; fewer eating occasions were reported in the web-based record than in the interview-based recall (mean difference = -0.36; Wilcoxon P < 0.001), and the ICC and Spearman’s correlation coefficient were 0.72 and 0.70, respectively. Agreement for the caloric midpoint was similar (Wilcoxon P = 0.68; ICC = 0.65; Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.68). Stratified analyses showed higher agreements for the number of eating occasions and caloric midpoint among women and adults aged <60 years.  Conclusions: Eating timing metrics showed good to excellent agreement between a web-based 24-hr dietary record and an interview-based 24-hr recall. The NutriNet-Santé dietary records are an effective tool for assessing eating timing.  Key messages: • A web-based dietary record showed good agreement with an interview-based recall for eating timing metrics.  • Web-based 24-hr dietary records are effective tools to assess eating timing in largescale populations.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -