A Prospective Comparative Study of Opioid-Free Anesthesia and Opioid-Based Anesthesia for Postoperative Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
6 affiliations
- 1Department of Anesthesiology, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.
- 2Department of Orthopedics, Dr. RK Diabetic Foot and Podiatry Institute, Chennai, IND.
- 3Department of Plastic Surgery, Khoula Hospital, Muscat, OMN.
- 4Department of General Medicine, Sri Ramaswamy Memorial (SRM) Medical College and Hospital, Trichy, IND.
- 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Badr Al Samaa Hospital, Muscat, OMN.
- 6Department of Emergency Medicine, N. K. P. Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Nagpur, IND.
Abstract
Opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) is widely used for laparoscopic surgery but may be associated with opioid-related adverse effects, including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), respiratory depression, pruritus, and delayed recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) compared with OBA in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery, with postoperative pain assessed as the primary outcome. This double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology at Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Chengalpattu, India. Sixty-two adults undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to OFA (n = 31) or OBA (n = 31). Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included rescue analgesia, perioperative hemodynamic parameters, PONV, and other postoperative adverse events. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. VAS scores were significantly lower with OFA at six hours (3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 4.6 ± 1.2; Holm-adjusted p < 0.001), 12 hours (3.2 ± 0.9 vs. 4.0 ± 0.8; p = 0.004), and 24 hours (3.0 ± 0.6 vs. 3.4 ± 0.4; p = 0.009), whereas scores at 2 and 48 hours were comparable. Rescue analgesia within six hours was required by one patient (3.2%) in the OFA group and six patients (19.4%) in the OBA group (Fisher's exact p = 0.104). Among participants with a recorded rescue-analgesia event, the reported mean time to first rescue analgesia was longer with OFA (8.7 ± 1.9 vs. 7.0 ± 1.7 hours; p < 0.001). Heart rate and systolic blood pressure were comparable between the groups, while diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were higher with OFA at six hours postoperatively. PONV at six hours and overall complications were less frequent with OFA. OFA was associated with improved early postoperative analgesia, with lower VAS scores at 6, 12, and 24 hours following elective laparoscopic surgery. Although rescue analgesia within six hours was numerically less frequent with OFA, the difference was not statistically significant. OFA was also associated with lower PONV at six hours and fewer overall complications. Perioperative hemodynamic parameters were broadly comparable, with modest differences in diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure at six hours. Larger multicenter randomized trials are warranted to confirm these findings.
Related
- Opioid-sparing anesthesia with pre-induction dexmetedomidine in children undergoing strabismus surgery: a prospective comparative cohort study
- Tip perfusion index for monitoring perioperative stress responses in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study
- Dual benefit of esketamine-based opioid-free anesthesia on postoperative pain and mental health outcomes in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
- The effect of bispectral index-controlled sedation on postoperative cognitive health in elderly patients with spinal anesthesia undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty: randomized, blinded study.
- The effect of goal-directed fluid therapy on endothelial glycocalyx and short-term postoperative recovery quality in older patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia or gallbladder surgery: a randomized controlled double-blind clinical study.
BibTeX
@article{johnson2026prospective,
title = {{A Prospective Comparative Study of Opioid-Free Anesthesia and Opioid-Based Anesthesia for Postoperative Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.}},
author = {Sneha A Johnson and Dilip Kumar Govindan and Easwar Elango and Sony Prakkattumannathu Varghese and Prabakaran P Thamilmani and Jyothi Susan Thomas and Shubhada Deshmukh},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.117045},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953472},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A Prospective Comparative Study of Opioid-Free Anesthesia and Opioid-Based Anesthesia for Postoperative Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
AU - Sneha A Johnson
AU - Dilip Kumar Govindan
AU - Easwar Elango
AU - Sony Prakkattumannathu Varghese
AU - Prabakaran P Thamilmani
AU - Jyothi Susan Thomas
AU - Shubhada Deshmukh
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/28
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.117045
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953472
AB - Opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) is widely used for laparoscopic surgery but may be associated with opioid-related adverse effects, including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), respiratory depression, pruritus, and delayed recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) compared with OBA in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery, with postoperative pain assessed as the primary outcome. This double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology at Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Chengalpattu, India. Sixty-two adults undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to OFA (n = 31) or OBA (n = 31). Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included rescue analgesia, perioperative hemodynamic parameters, PONV, and other postoperative adverse events. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. VAS scores were significantly lower with OFA at six hours (3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 4.6 ± 1.2; Holm-adjusted p < 0.001), 12 hours (3.2 ± 0.9 vs. 4.0 ± 0.8; p = 0.004), and 24 hours (3.0 ± 0.6 vs. 3.4 ± 0.4; p = 0.009), whereas scores at 2 and 48 hours were comparable. Rescue analgesia within six hours was required by one patient (3.2%) in the OFA group and six patients (19.4%) in the OBA group (Fisher's exact p = 0.104). Among participants with a recorded rescue-analgesia event, the reported mean time to first rescue analgesia was longer with OFA (8.7 ± 1.9 vs. 7.0 ± 1.7 hours; p < 0.001). Heart rate and systolic blood pressure were comparable between the groups, while diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were higher with OFA at six hours postoperatively. PONV at six hours and overall complications were less frequent with OFA. OFA was associated with improved early postoperative analgesia, with lower VAS scores at 6, 12, and 24 hours following elective laparoscopic surgery. Although rescue analgesia within six hours was numerically less frequent with OFA, the difference was not statistically significant. OFA was also associated with lower PONV at six hours and fewer overall complications. Perioperative hemodynamic parameters were broadly comparable, with modest differences in diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure at six hours. Larger multicenter randomized trials are warranted to confirm these findings.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -