Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJournal of the American Heart Association

Contemporary Analysis of the Volume–Outcome Relationship for Patients With Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

  1. 1David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA

Abstract

Background Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) carries a substantial mortality burden and risk of long‐term morbidity. Although prior investigations have demonstrated an inverse association between SAH admission volume and in‐hospital mortality, reported thresholds remain broad. Importantly, the relative importance of both admission and procedural volume has yet to be evaluated on a national scale. We examined the association of volume metrics with outcomes in an SAH cohort. Methods All adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of nontraumatic SAH were identified from the 2016 to 2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multivariable regression models were developed to evaluate the independent and joint associations of SAH admission and clipping and coiling procedural volume with in‐hospital outcomes. Results Of an estimated 142 271 hospitalizations, index mortality was 20.2%. Following risk adjustment, both increasing SAH admission volume and clipping and coiling procedural volume were independently associated with reduced mortality. When modeled jointly, however, clipping and coiling procedural volume remained an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.981 per 10 procedures, P <0.001) whereas SAH admission volume was no longer significant ( P =0.40). Conclusions Joint examination of SAH and clipping and coiling procedural volume revealed procedural caseload to be the dominant predictor of in‐hospital mortality, suggesting that survival benefits historically attributed to admission volume may be more precisely explained by procedural expertise. These findings support reexamination of volume‐based benchmarks in contemporary cerebrovascular care frameworks.

Related

  1. Hemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio and in-hospital mortality in patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study
    Weiming Xu, Wenhui He, Hengheng Zhai +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  2. Association of Pretreatment Hepatic Function Markers with Clazosentan-Associated Fluid Retention in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
    Kinuka Oguni, Rintaro Sogawa, Yuki Nakano +4
    Biological and Pharmaceutical BulletinPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textNeurologyJ-STAGE
  3. Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome of patients with undetected aneurysms on initial DSA after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
    Carolin Albrecht, Laura Aberle, Ann-Kathrin Joerger +8
    Brain & spinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  4. Prognostic value of platelet-to-white blood cell ratio in critically ill patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: a machine learning-driven study of the public database and the hospital information system
    Liang Liu, Zhilei Huang, Binbin Gui +6
    Frontiers in neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Following Ischemic Stroke in Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia
    Masahiro Kashiura, Takashi Moriya
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurologyJ-STAGE
BibTeX
@article{lai2026contemporary,
  title = {{Contemporary Analysis of the Volume–Outcome Relationship for Patients With Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage}},
  author = {Owen Lai and Jaden Rahmani and Preston Leung and Konmal Ali and Syed S. Ali and Won Kim and Geoffrey P. Colby and Peyman Benharash},
  journal = {Journal of the American Heart Association},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1161/jaha.126.050933},
  url = {https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.126.050933},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Contemporary Analysis of the Volume–Outcome Relationship for Patients With Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
AU  - Owen Lai
AU  - Jaden Rahmani
AU  - Preston Leung
AU  - Konmal Ali
AU  - Syed S. Ali
AU  - Won Kim
AU  - Geoffrey P. Colby
AU  - Peyman Benharash
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Journal of the American Heart Association
DO  - 10.1161/jaha.126.050933
UR  - https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.126.050933
AB  - Background Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) carries a substantial mortality burden and risk of long‐term morbidity. Although prior investigations have demonstrated an inverse association between SAH admission volume and in‐hospital mortality, reported thresholds remain broad. Importantly, the relative importance of both admission and procedural volume has yet to be evaluated on a national scale. We examined the association of volume metrics with outcomes in an SAH cohort. Methods All adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of nontraumatic SAH were identified from the 2016 to 2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multivariable regression models were developed to evaluate the independent and joint associations of SAH admission and clipping and coiling procedural volume with in‐hospital outcomes. Results Of an estimated 142 271 hospitalizations, index mortality was 20.2%. Following risk adjustment, both increasing SAH admission volume and clipping and coiling procedural volume were independently associated with reduced mortality. When modeled jointly, however, clipping and coiling procedural volume remained an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.981 per 10 procedures, P <0.001) whereas SAH admission volume was no longer significant ( P =0.40). Conclusions Joint examination of SAH and clipping and coiling procedural volume revealed procedural caseload to be the dominant predictor of in‐hospital mortality, suggesting that survival benefits historically attributed to admission volume may be more precisely explained by procedural expertise. These findings support reexamination of volume‐based benchmarks in contemporary cerebrovascular care frameworks.
SN  - 2047-9980
ER  -