Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,631 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Limitations of renal arterial hemodynamic measures as candidate biomarkers of renal sympathetic innervation

  1. 1University of Nebraska Medical Center

Abstract

Introduction: The key role of maladaptive renal sympathetic activation in hypertension has led to the development of catheter-based renal denervation therapies. Unfortunately, the lack of practical physiological biomarkers impairs patient selection and prevents intraprocedural feedback for renal denervation. Methods: We tested whether renal arterial hemodynamic measures and the beat-to-beat variability of these measures reflect renal sympathetic innervation in two tightly controlled preclinical models of renal denervation. Bilateral renal hemodynamic data were obtained from ten conscious unilaterally denervated rabbits and ten anesthetized unilaterally denervated pigs that subsequently underwent stepwise catheter-based radiofrequency denervation of the contralateral kidney. Renal arterial mechanics were assessed by quantification of wave speed and input impedance modulus and phase shift. Variability was quantified as the within-recording standard deviation of each metric when measured on a beat-to-beat basis. Results: Wave speed trended down after surgical denervation in rabbits (P = 0.054) but not swine (P = 0.57); wave speed variability was unchanged in both models. Renal arterial input impedance modulus was not significantly affected by surgical denervation. Surgical renal denervation increased input impedance phase shift in rabbits (P = 0.0048) but not in swine (P = 0.85). The beat-to-beat variability of modulus did not differ significantly between innervated and surgically denervated kidneys in either species. Surgical renal denervation decreased phase shift variability in swine (P = 0.0048) but not rabbits. The difference in phase shift variability between kidneys in swine was eliminated after a single round of branch-vessel ablation (P = 0.42). Discussion: Renal arterial wave speed, input impedance, and their beat-to-beat variability did not consistently or dose-dependently reflect renal sympathetic innervation in these models. These findings argue against their use as direct physiological surrogates for renal sympathetic outflow.

Related

  1. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Promote Sympathetic Innervation in Mouse Adipose Tissues
    Koukou Fu, Zhangyuzi Deng, Wenjing Wu +2
    MetabolitesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PhysiologyCrossref
  2. EphrinA4/EphA4 controls blood pressure via arterial sympathetic innervation in male mice
    Emilie Simonnet, Sabrina Martin, José Vilar +17
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossrefHAL
  3. Hemodynamic biomarkers in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: evidence boundaries and research pathways from prognostic stratification to treatment-effect prediction
    Ruying Hu, Zizhao Zhang, Zipeng Wang +3
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  4. Circulating Biomarkers with Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Monitoring: Evidence, Limitations, and Translation
    Wenyuan Wei, Rui Zhang, Zhiying Zhang
    Therapeutics and Clinical Risk ManagementPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  5. FLAIR vascular hyperintensities in acute ischemic stroke: from collateral-related imaging findings to a candidate dynamic hemodynamic imaging phenotype
    Mingqian Qin, Lei Wang, Guosheng Han
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@misc{dettmer2026limitations,
  title = {{Limitations of renal arterial hemodynamic measures as candidate biomarkers of renal sympathetic innervation}},
  author = {C. Dettmer and A. M. Schiller and I. H. Zucker and Y. S. Chatzizisis and H. Wang and P. R. Pellegrino},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.15.751794},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.15.751794v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Limitations of renal arterial hemodynamic measures as candidate biomarkers of renal sympathetic innervation
AU  - C. Dettmer
AU  - A. M. Schiller
AU  - I. H. Zucker
AU  - Y. S. Chatzizisis
AU  - H. Wang
AU  - P. R. Pellegrino
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/15
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.15.751794
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.15.751794v1
AB  - Introduction: The key role of maladaptive renal sympathetic activation in hypertension has led to the development of catheter-based renal denervation therapies. Unfortunately, the lack of practical physiological biomarkers impairs patient selection and prevents intraprocedural feedback for renal denervation. Methods: We tested whether renal arterial hemodynamic measures and the beat-to-beat variability of these measures reflect renal sympathetic innervation in two tightly controlled preclinical models of renal denervation. Bilateral renal hemodynamic data were obtained from ten conscious unilaterally denervated rabbits and ten anesthetized unilaterally denervated pigs that subsequently underwent stepwise catheter-based radiofrequency denervation of the contralateral kidney. Renal arterial mechanics were assessed by quantification of wave speed and input impedance modulus and phase shift. Variability was quantified as the within-recording standard deviation of each metric when measured on a beat-to-beat basis. Results: Wave speed trended down after surgical denervation in rabbits (P = 0.054) but not swine (P = 0.57); wave speed variability was unchanged in both models. Renal arterial input impedance modulus was not significantly affected by surgical denervation. Surgical renal denervation increased input impedance phase shift in rabbits (P = 0.0048) but not in swine (P = 0.85). The beat-to-beat variability of modulus did not differ significantly between innervated and surgically denervated kidneys in either species. Surgical renal denervation decreased phase shift variability in swine (P = 0.0048) but not rabbits. The difference in phase shift variability between kidneys in swine was eliminated after a single round of branch-vessel ablation (P = 0.42). Discussion: Renal arterial wave speed, input impedance, and their beat-to-beat variability did not consistently or dose-dependently reflect renal sympathetic innervation in these models. These findings argue against their use as direct physiological surrogates for renal sympathetic outflow.
ER  -