Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBMC Public Health

Facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of type 2 diabetes remission programmes: a qualitative meta-synthesis from a multi-stakeholder perspective

  1. 1Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University
  2. 2Teaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Abstract

Background Although type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission has emerged as a promising therapeutic goal, its implementation in real-world settings faces considerable challenges. Understanding the perspectives of multiple stakeholders is essential to address these implementation challenges. This meta-synthesis aims to identify and synthesise facilitators and barriers to the implementation of T2D remission programmes from the perspectives of different stakeholders. Methods Eleven databases were searched from inception to August 1, 2026. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and appraised methodological quality using the 10-item Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Data were analysed and synthesised using thematic analysis, with findings mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behaviour (COM-B) model. Results A total of 22 studies involving 277 patients and 237 stakeholders were included. Key facilitators for patient engagement in T2D remission included perceived benefits of remission, accessible and sustained support networks, and the convenience enabled by digital health tools. Major barriers included limited health literacy, restrictive sociocultural norms and dietary habits, and negative emotions. For stakeholders, key facilitators were multidisciplinary collaboration, personalised intervention approaches, supportive policies, and growing recognition of the value of T2D remission. Barriers included inconsistent understanding of T2D remission, variations in professional capacity and roles, resource constraints, and uncertainty about intervention effectiveness. These findings, interpreted through the COM-B framework, identified multi-level factors shaping the implementation and sustainability of T2D remission programmes. Conclusion Sustainable implementation of T2D remission programmes requires patient-centred approaches that promote accurate understanding of remission and positive patient experiences, strengthened healthcare provider capacity through training and multidisciplinary collaboration, and adaptation of interventions to local contexts. These findings highlight the importance of stakeholder-informed strategies to enhance patient engagement and guide the future design and implementation of T2D remission programmes. Trial registration The review has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD420251037259.

Related

  1. Pre-implementation barriers and facilitators to implementing a physical activity guideline for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a qualitative stakeholder study
    Zi Tian, Shi Zhang, Xinli Ni +8
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Barriers and Facilitators Influencing Physiotherapists’ Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines and Return to Sport Criteria after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Qualitative Study in Austria.
    International journal of sports physical therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Stakeholder perspectives on sustainable antenatal point-of-care ultrasound (APOCUS) implementation in rural Australia: a qualitative study of professional body submissions and clinician focus groups.
    Amber Bidner, Sandhya Maranna, Eva Bezak +1
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Perceived facilitators and barriers influencing lifestyle modification among adults with cardiovascular disease attending a cardiac clinic at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: An exploratory qualitative study
    Gladness N. Mkawe, Benedicto Mgala, Neema Mawi +5
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyCardiovascular medicinePLOSPMC
  5. A preliminary qualitative exploration of perceived barriers and facilitators prior to implementation of a pressure injury prevention program in home care: perspectives of care managers in Japan.
    Keisuke Iwase, Hironori Tsuzuki, Masushi Kohta +2
    Fujita medical journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{jin2026facilitators,
  title = {{Facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of type 2 diabetes remission programmes: a qualitative meta-synthesis from a multi-stakeholder perspective}},
  author = {Songna Jin and Linyue Tan and Qiuhong Zhou and Wei Zhao and Liaofang Wu},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-29495-3},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-29495-3},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of type 2 diabetes remission programmes: a qualitative meta-synthesis from a multi-stakeholder perspective
AU  - Songna Jin
AU  - Linyue Tan
AU  - Qiuhong Zhou
AU  - Wei Zhao
AU  - Liaofang Wu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-29495-3
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-29495-3
AB  - Background Although type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission has emerged as a promising therapeutic goal, its implementation in real-world settings faces considerable challenges. Understanding the perspectives of multiple stakeholders is essential to address these implementation challenges. This meta-synthesis aims to identify and synthesise facilitators and barriers to the implementation of T2D remission programmes from the perspectives of different stakeholders. Methods Eleven databases were searched from inception to August 1, 2026. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and appraised methodological quality using the 10-item Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Data were analysed and synthesised using thematic analysis, with findings mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behaviour (COM-B) model. Results A total of 22 studies involving 277 patients and 237 stakeholders were included. Key facilitators for patient engagement in T2D remission included perceived benefits of remission, accessible and sustained support networks, and the convenience enabled by digital health tools. Major barriers included limited health literacy, restrictive sociocultural norms and dietary habits, and negative emotions. For stakeholders, key facilitators were multidisciplinary collaboration, personalised intervention approaches, supportive policies, and growing recognition of the value of T2D remission. Barriers included inconsistent understanding of T2D remission, variations in professional capacity and roles, resource constraints, and uncertainty about intervention effectiveness. These findings, interpreted through the COM-B framework, identified multi-level factors shaping the implementation and sustainability of T2D remission programmes. Conclusion Sustainable implementation of T2D remission programmes requires patient-centred approaches that promote accurate understanding of remission and positive patient experiences, strengthened healthcare provider capacity through training and multidisciplinary collaboration, and adaptation of interventions to local contexts. These findings highlight the importance of stakeholder-informed strategies to enhance patient engagement and guide the future design and implementation of T2D remission programmes. Trial registration The review has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD420251037259.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -