Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYData in brief

A reproducible simulation dataset and benchmark for parametric competing-risks inference under censoring and latent dependence.

6 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Information Technology, Hindusthan College of Engineering and Technology, Valley Campus, Pollachi Highway, Othakkalmandapam, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641032, India.
  2. 2Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SNS College of Technology, SNS Kalvi Nagar, Sathy Main Road, Vazhiyampalayam, Saravanampatti Post, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641035, India.
  3. 3Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering and Technology, Mackkinaickenpatti Post, Udumalai Road, Pollachi, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 642003, India.
  4. 4Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kalaignarkarunanidhi Institute of Technology, Kannampalayam Post, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641402, India.
  5. 5Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Shree Venkateshwara Hi-Tech Engineering College, Erode-Gobi Main Road, Sri Kalivani Nagar, Othakuthirai, Gobichettipalayam, Erode, Tamil Nadu, 638455, India.
  6. 6Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, No. 42, Avadi-Vel Tech Road, Vel Nagar, Avadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600062, India.

Abstract

This article describes a simulation dataset for evaluating parametric competing-risks inference under censoring and latent dependence. The dataset was generated in Python and contains 648,000 replicate records from 303 block-specific scenarios, representing 291 unique statistical conditions. The design includes exponential, Weibull and Gompertz lifetime models, two, three and five competing causes, and sample sizes ranging from 20 to 200. Type-I, Type-II and hybrid censoring are considered. A separate dependence block uses Clayton, Frank and Gumbel copulas with Kendall's tau values of 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75, with inference performed under a working-independence assumption. Replicate records contain estimates, test statistics and availability indicators for Wald, likelihood-ratio and score tests. The release provides 303 Parquet partitions, scenario and parameter registries, summaries of bias and root mean squared error, Monte Carlo uncertainty estimates, and bootstrap coverage checks. A representative subject-level sample contains 35,250 rows. Supporting materials include an executed notebook, figures, a field-level data dictionary, validation records and file checksums. Recorded identifiers and deterministic seeds support regeneration of individual simulated studies. Researchers can use the data to evaluate statistical procedures across the documented conditions, examine test availability and boundary cases, reproduce benchmark calculations, and develop teaching examples.

Related

  1. Fractional-Order Sliding-Mode Control of a Rail-Mounted Redundant SCARA Under Actuator Degradation and Elbow Locking: Truncated-Memory Analysis and a Reproducible Simulation Benchmark
    Claudio Urrea
    Fractal and FractionalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Analysis & PDEsCrossref
  2. A parametric mixture cure rate model with competing risks
    Carolyne Soares de Brito, Frederico Machado Almeida
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. TRACE: A Reproducible Benchmark for Electricity Price Forecasting with Official Operational Text
    Xinyi Yi, Zhangdie Yuan, Ioannis Lestas
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. A mechanism-guided simulation framework for synthetic tax-risk data: Constraint validation and reproducible benchmarking
    Xiaojing Fan
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCell biologyNeurosciencePLOS
  5. An adaptive energy management and control framework for long-endurance UAV missions in dynamic environments: A reproducible simulation study
    Jiazheng Wang, Parvathy Rajendran, Aohua Li +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Materials & polymersAtmospheric science & meteorologyPLOS
BibTeX
@article{sabrigiriraj2026reproducible,
  title = {{A reproducible simulation dataset and benchmark for parametric competing-risks inference under censoring and latent dependence.}},
  author = {Sabrigiriraj M and Manoharan K and Senthil Madasamy N and Govindaraj V and Prathipa K and Ravi T},
  journal = {Data in brief},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1016/j.dib.2026.113340},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927294},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A reproducible simulation dataset and benchmark for parametric competing-risks inference under censoring and latent dependence.
AU  - Sabrigiriraj M
AU  - Manoharan K
AU  - Senthil Madasamy N
AU  - Govindaraj V
AU  - Prathipa K
AU  - Ravi T
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/01
JO  - Data in brief
DO  - 10.1016/j.dib.2026.113340
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927294
AB  - This article describes a simulation dataset for evaluating parametric competing-risks inference under censoring and latent dependence. The dataset was generated in Python and contains 648,000 replicate records from 303 block-specific scenarios, representing 291 unique statistical conditions. The design includes exponential, Weibull and Gompertz lifetime models, two, three and five competing causes, and sample sizes ranging from 20 to 200. Type-I, Type-II and hybrid censoring are considered. A separate dependence block uses Clayton, Frank and Gumbel copulas with Kendall's tau values of 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75, with inference performed under a working-independence assumption. Replicate records contain estimates, test statistics and availability indicators for Wald, likelihood-ratio and score tests. The release provides 303 Parquet partitions, scenario and parameter registries, summaries of bias and root mean squared error, Monte Carlo uncertainty estimates, and bootstrap coverage checks. A representative subject-level sample contains 35,250 rows. Supporting materials include an executed notebook, figures, a field-level data dictionary, validation records and file checksums. Recorded identifiers and deterministic seeds support regeneration of individual simulated studies. Researchers can use the data to evaluate statistical procedures across the documented conditions, examine test availability and boundary cases, reproduce benchmark calculations, and develop teaching examples.
SN  - 2352-3409
ER  -