Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,332 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals

The Organisational Drivers That Enabled Health Promoting Policy Change Within Australian Universities-A 2016 Move to Smoke-Free Campuses Case Study.

  1. 1School of Health and Social Development, Health, Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia.
  2. 2School of Health and Social Development and the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia.
  3. 3School of Health and Social Development, Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia.

Abstract

Issue addressed

Universities are complex organisational settings for health promotion, operating as workplaces, educational institutions and influential community leaders. In 2016, Australian universities were progressively adopting smoke-free campus policies within a broader expansion of smoke-free public policy and tobacco control measures. However, across the sector, implementation was inconsistent. This study examines factors that enabled smoke-free policy change during this formative period, using university tobacco policy as a case study of health-promoting organisational change.Methods

This study conducted semi-structured interviews in 2016 to explore the experiences of 32 staff across 10 Australian universities and examine organisational and contextual influences on the development and implementation of smoke-free policies. Data were analysed using an inductive approach informed by Kotter's stages of change.Results

Similar organisational dynamics supported smoke-free policy change across institutions. Senior executive support acted as a catalyst for change, while internal champions sustained momentum and operationalised policy implementation. Resource investment, organisational priorities and external influences also shaped implementation.Conclusion

The findings provide insight into how Australian universities navigated smoke-free policy change during a formative period of tobacco-control implementation. While the specific policy context has since evolved, the findings highlight organisational processes that influenced the development and implementation of health promoting policy.

Related

  1. Drivers of Opportunity Exploitation in Entrepreneurial Universities: A Meta Synthesis Study
    Mahdi Khayatan, Ali Davari, Ali Motevali
    تحقیق و توسعه سلامتPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Healing campuses: Implementing Nature-Based Interventions to Promote University Student Mental Health and Wellbeing
    Melissa O’Shea, Brittany Patafio, David Skvarc +7
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  3. Organisational learning in hospital systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study
    Lianne Jeffs, Frances Bruno, Vanessa Wright +3
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral medicineCrossref
  4. Maternal critical care infrastructure and organisational preparedness in Türkiye: a national analysis of the MaCriCare cross-sectional survey
    Dudu Berrin Günaydın, Selin Erel, Miray Gözde Özdemir +4
    Annals of medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Towards a standardised definition of full-time culture and its organisational facilitators and barriers among nursing care staff within Norwegian health services: a Delphi study protocol
    Kari Ingstad, Trude Anita Hartviksen, Marianne Mareliussen +4
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{taylor2026organisational,
  title = {{The Organisational Drivers That Enabled Health Promoting Policy Change Within Australian Universities-A 2016 Move to Smoke-Free Campuses Case Study.}},
  author = {Patricia Taylor and Fiona H McKay and Catherine M Bennett},
  journal = {Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/hpja.70254},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42899584},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Organisational Drivers That Enabled Health Promoting Policy Change Within Australian Universities-A 2016 Move to Smoke-Free Campuses Case Study.
AU  - Patricia Taylor
AU  - Fiona H McKay
AU  - Catherine M Bennett
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals
DO  - 10.1002/hpja.70254
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42899584
AB  - Issue addressed  Universities are complex organisational settings for health promotion, operating as workplaces, educational institutions and influential community leaders. In 2016, Australian universities were progressively adopting smoke-free campus policies within a broader expansion of smoke-free public policy and tobacco control measures. However, across the sector, implementation was inconsistent. This study examines factors that enabled smoke-free policy change during this formative period, using university tobacco policy as a case study of health-promoting organisational change.Methods  This study conducted semi-structured interviews in 2016 to explore the experiences of 32 staff across 10 Australian universities and examine organisational and contextual influences on the development and implementation of smoke-free policies. Data were analysed using an inductive approach informed by Kotter's stages of change.Results  Similar organisational dynamics supported smoke-free policy change across institutions. Senior executive support acted as a catalyst for change, while internal champions sustained momentum and operationalised policy implementation. Resource investment, organisational priorities and external influences also shaped implementation.Conclusion  The findings provide insight into how Australian universities navigated smoke-free policy change during a formative period of tobacco-control implementation. While the specific policy context has since evolved, the findings highlight organisational processes that influenced the development and implementation of health promoting policy.
SN  - 1036-1073
ER  -