Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

From density to spatial function: spatial multi-omics, composite biomarker design, and therapeutic engineering of tertiary lymphoid structures in solid tumors

  1. 1The Sixth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou Medical University (Qingyuan People’s Hospital)
  2. 2Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, The Second People’s Hospital of Shenzhen

Abstract

Background: Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) have emerged as clinically relevant immune niches associated with improved survival and enhanced response to immune checkpoint inhibitors across multiple solid tumors. However, translational evaluation remains dominated by density-based scoring, which inadequately captures the functional heterogeneity of histologically similar lymphoid aggregates. This review synthesizes recent advances in spatial biology that support a shift from counting TLSs to interpreting them as spatially organized immune microenvironmental units embedded within local tumor ecosystems.

Main body: Evidence from spatial transcriptomics, multiplexed imaging, single-cell profiling, computational pathology, and spatial-proteomic approaches converges on four coupled requirements for productive TLS function: stromal licensing through lymphotoxin-dependent chemokine circuits, vascular competence mediated by specialized high endothelial venules, helper T-cell programs that bridge follicular and cytotoxic immunity, and a permissive metabolic context that enables maturation. Spatial studies further show that regulatory infiltration, suppressive plasma-cell programs, and metabolic disruption can decouple structural presence from effective antitumor immunity. Across tumor types, these insights indicate that biomarker performance improves when TLS density is integrated with maturity, anatomical location, HEV coupling, immune composition, and treatment context rather than used as a standalone metric. We further discuss how spatial analyses reveal actionable pathways for inducing or reprogramming TLSs and outline a staged, module-matched composite biomarker workflow combining digital pathology, targeted multiplexed imaging, and focused molecular or metabolic augmentation.

Conclusions: TLSs should be regarded as spatially organized, functionally heterogeneous immune microenvironmental units rather than biologically equivalent lymphoid aggregates. A spatial-functional framework helps explain productive, arrested, and suppressive TLS states, provides a basis for next-generation composite biomarkers, and supports module-matched therapeutic strategies tailored to the stromal, vascular, helper-cell, or metabolic bottleneck limiting TLS function in individual tumors. The immediate next step is prospective validation of a minimal TLS panel across defined treatment contexts.

Related

  1. Lactate as a predictive biomarker and therapeutic target in cardiopulmonary bypass-associated acute kidney injury
    Dinghao Xue, Mingru Zhang, Xinlu Chang +4
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCell PressCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. CCR2 is a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in Group 3 medulloblastoma
    C. Custodia, R. Cascao, E. Paisana +12
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textOncologybioRxiv
  3. Multi-omics of tertiary lymphoid structures in breast cancer: clinical significance and biomarker potential
    Chang’e Chen, Haiping Song
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefPMC
  4. Temporal and therapeutic confounders in predicting efficacy of immunotherapy rechallenge via baseline intratumoral tertiary lymphoid structures.
    Anran Sun, Hongkai Chen, Anyang Wei
    Journal for immunotherapy of cancerPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  5. ATG16L2 as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma
    Xiaoqun Xu, Chaofeng Zhou, Rui Zhang +2
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOncologyCell PressCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{wang2026from,
  title = {{From density to spatial function: spatial multi-omics, composite biomarker design, and therapeutic engineering of tertiary lymphoid structures in solid tumors}},
  author = {Xuchen Wang and Lin Lin},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1865949},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1865949/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - From density to spatial function: spatial multi-omics, composite biomarker design, and therapeutic engineering of tertiary lymphoid structures in solid tumors
AU  - Xuchen Wang
AU  - Lin Lin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1865949
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1865949/full
AB  - Background: Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) have emerged as clinically relevant immune niches associated with improved survival and enhanced response to immune checkpoint inhibitors across multiple solid tumors. However, translational evaluation remains dominated by density-based scoring, which inadequately captures the functional heterogeneity of histologically similar lymphoid aggregates. This review synthesizes recent advances in spatial biology that support a shift from counting TLSs to interpreting them as spatially organized immune microenvironmental units embedded within local tumor ecosystems.  Main body: Evidence from spatial transcriptomics, multiplexed imaging, single-cell profiling, computational pathology, and spatial-proteomic approaches converges on four coupled requirements for productive TLS function: stromal licensing through lymphotoxin-dependent chemokine circuits, vascular competence mediated by specialized high endothelial venules, helper T-cell programs that bridge follicular and cytotoxic immunity, and a permissive metabolic context that enables maturation. Spatial studies further show that regulatory infiltration, suppressive plasma-cell programs, and metabolic disruption can decouple structural presence from effective antitumor immunity. Across tumor types, these insights indicate that biomarker performance improves when TLS density is integrated with maturity, anatomical location, HEV coupling, immune composition, and treatment context rather than used as a standalone metric. We further discuss how spatial analyses reveal actionable pathways for inducing or reprogramming TLSs and outline a staged, module-matched composite biomarker workflow combining digital pathology, targeted multiplexed imaging, and focused molecular or metabolic augmentation.  Conclusions: TLSs should be regarded as spatially organized, functionally heterogeneous immune microenvironmental units rather than biologically equivalent lymphoid aggregates. A spatial-functional framework helps explain productive, arrested, and suppressive TLS states, provides a basis for next-generation composite biomarkers, and supports module-matched therapeutic strategies tailored to the stromal, vascular, helper-cell, or metabolic bottleneck limiting TLS function in individual tumors. The immediate next step is prospective validation of a minimal TLS panel across defined treatment contexts.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -