Soil invertebrate biomass estimation from image-derived body area and contour length
- 1Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Goerlitz
Abstract
1. Soil invertebrate biomass is closely linked to ecosystem processes, yet its routine quantification remains constrained by the effort required to weigh large numbers of small individuals. Length-mass relationships provide an indirect alternative, but body length can be difficult to standardise and extract automatically from images of curved, coiled or contracted organisms. Projected body area may provide a more tractable image-derived predictor, but its performance across diverse soil-faunal taxa and at the community scale remains insufficiently evaluated. 2. Here, we developed a framework using projected body area and contour length to estimate fresh and dry mass from measurements of 1,792 soil invertebrates representing 15 higher-level taxa. We fitted taxon-specific models for six well-represented groups and general models across taxa, and evaluated predictive performance using leave-one-out cross-validation. We then assessed cross-dataset transferability by comparing our data with those of Lemoine et al. (2026) and pooled the two datasets to derive combined models. Finally, we tested whether individual predictions could be scaled to independently measured community biomass. 3. Taxon-specific models generally reduced prediction error relative to general models, with mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values of 6.9-37.3% for fresh mass and 7.6-30.2% for dry mass. General models retained MAPEs of 27.2% and 22.4%, respectively. Comparisons of our dataset with that of Lemoine et al. (2026) showed no detectable differences in six of eight taxon-by-mass slopes. Although intercepts frequently differed, no overall dataset effect was detected after accounting for taxa. Pooling both datasets broadened model development, while taxon-specific models generally retained lower error than the combined general model. Finally, community-level predictions tracked measured biomass across all model sets (R2 = 0.87-0.99), but absolute error varied among models and faunal groups (MAPE = 9.6-52.5%). 4. Body area and contour length extracted from images therefore provide a practical basis for scaling soil invertebrate biomass estimation from individuals to communities. Integration with automated imaging and segmentation tools such as flatbug, BIODISCOVER and CollembolAI could extend soil invertebrate monitoring at larger scales beyond abundance and taxonomic composition to biomass, while providing scalable inputs for analyses of food webs and general ecosystem ecology.
Related
- Non-destructive estimation of individual buckwheat plant biomass using high-throughput phenotyping-derived canopy traits
- Investigating biotic, chemical, and physical drivers of periphyton and invertebrate biomass in boreal streams supporting juvenile Atlantic salmon
- Computer vision-based estimation of small arthropod biomass
- A systematic review of biomass and carbon stock estimation approaches: Methods, uncertainties, and emerging opportunities
- Algal Biomass and Algal-Derived Preparations in Livestock Nutrition: Gut Microbiota Modulation, Host Molecular Pathways, and Bioprocess Innovations.
BibTeX
@misc{zhang2026soil,
title = {{Soil invertebrate biomass estimation from image-derived body area and contour length}},
author = {A. Zhang and J.-Z. Lu and A. Zuev and B. Zhu and N. Scheunemann and C. Wiesener and A. Kauk and B. Balkenhol and J. Noe and S. Moll and S. Li and A. Potapov and C. Schneider},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.07.757327},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757327v1},
note = {CC BY-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Soil invertebrate biomass estimation from image-derived body area and contour length
AU - A. Zhang
AU - J.-Z. Lu
AU - A. Zuev
AU - B. Zhu
AU - N. Scheunemann
AU - C. Wiesener
AU - A. Kauk
AU - B. Balkenhol
AU - J. Noe
AU - S. Moll
AU - S. Li
AU - A. Potapov
AU - C. Schneider
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.07.757327
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757327v1
AB - 1. Soil invertebrate biomass is closely linked to ecosystem processes, yet its routine quantification remains constrained by the effort required to weigh large numbers of small individuals. Length-mass relationships provide an indirect alternative, but body length can be difficult to standardise and extract automatically from images of curved, coiled or contracted organisms. Projected body area may provide a more tractable image-derived predictor, but its performance across diverse soil-faunal taxa and at the community scale remains insufficiently evaluated. 2. Here, we developed a framework using projected body area and contour length to estimate fresh and dry mass from measurements of 1,792 soil invertebrates representing 15 higher-level taxa. We fitted taxon-specific models for six well-represented groups and general models across taxa, and evaluated predictive performance using leave-one-out cross-validation. We then assessed cross-dataset transferability by comparing our data with those of Lemoine et al. (2026) and pooled the two datasets to derive combined models. Finally, we tested whether individual predictions could be scaled to independently measured community biomass. 3. Taxon-specific models generally reduced prediction error relative to general models, with mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values of 6.9-37.3% for fresh mass and 7.6-30.2% for dry mass. General models retained MAPEs of 27.2% and 22.4%, respectively. Comparisons of our dataset with that of Lemoine et al. (2026) showed no detectable differences in six of eight taxon-by-mass slopes. Although intercepts frequently differed, no overall dataset effect was detected after accounting for taxa. Pooling both datasets broadened model development, while taxon-specific models generally retained lower error than the combined general model. Finally, community-level predictions tracked measured biomass across all model sets (R2 = 0.87-0.99), but absolute error varied among models and faunal groups (MAPE = 9.6-52.5%). 4. Body area and contour length extracted from images therefore provide a practical basis for scaling soil invertebrate biomass estimation from individuals to communities. Integration with automated imaging and segmentation tools such as flatbug, BIODISCOVER and CollembolAI could extend soil invertebrate monitoring at larger scales beyond abundance and taxonomic composition to biomass, while providing scalable inputs for analyses of food webs and general ecosystem ecology.
ER -