Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Geochronology

Dating circulations of hydrothermal fluids in the crystalline basements of unconformity-related metal deposits using in situ Rb ∕ Sr geochronology: proof of concept

Abstract

The use of in situ Rb–Sr geochronology has boomed in recent years following its implementation using LA-ICP-MS/MS technology, which enables fast, in situ analyses at the micron scale on selected minerals. The Rb–Sr geochronometer applied to micas is now commonly used to date the crystallization or cooling of metamorphic and magmatic rocks, based on the assumptions of a closed isotope system after passing the closure temperature and of a homogeneous Sr isotopic composition at the time of crystallization. In situ Rb–Sr geochronology applied to micas and related alteration products in geological contexts involving hydrothermal fluid circulation affecting micas after crystallization could provide a new way to decipher the timing and duration of fluid circulation in various settings such as mountain belts or sedimentary basins. The behavior and applicability of the Rb–Sr system in such contexts are, however, poorly understood, as the system may be partially reopened with differential redistribution of Rb and Sr at the grain scale. To test this hypothesis, we selected a case study related to unconformity-related U deposits from the Athabasca Basin (Canada), which formed through intense hydrothermal fluid circulation at the interface between crystalline basement and siliciclastic sedimentary rocks and represent archetypes of unconformity-related metal deposits. Muscovite grains from metamorphic and magmatic rocks were targeted across a range of alteration states, from hydrothermally unaltered to strongly altered domains. We focused on a specific hydrothermal alteration linked to the formation of hydrothermal illite and sudoite at the expense of metamorphic or magmatic minerals. In unaltered zones, muscovite displays variable but high Rb / Sr ratios, whereas the 87 Sr / 86 Sr intercepts derived from Rb–Sr regressions are scattered and are not interpreted as meaningful initial isotopic compositions. The resulting ages range from ca. 1870 to ca. 1720 Ma and are consistent with the geological context. In distal-to-proximal alteration halos of U deposits, muscovite and related alteration products yield lower 87 Rb / 86 Sr ratios and highly variable regression intercepts. The mean age calculated across the different samples and investigated sites clusters around ∼ 1640 Ma, a value previously obtained by Ar–Ar geochronology on illite and U–Pb geochronology on other hydrothermal phases and proposed to correspond to a major hydrothermal event linked to a geodynamic reorganization affecting the Canadian Shield at the circum-Laurentian scale. The ∼ 1640 Ma age is geologically meaningful in the studied context and is interpreted as reflecting partial, micrometric-scale resetting of the Rb–Sr system in muscovite during this hydrothermal event. The wide range of regression intercept values commonly observed in disturbed Rb–Sr systems is interpreted as an apparent result of open-system behavior, reflecting partial system reopening and non-conservative redistribution of Rb and Sr at the grain scale, rather than as a physically meaningful initial isotopic composition. These results demonstrate that detailed analysis of Rb–Sr system perturbations in altered muscovite and related alteration products can constrain the timing of ancient hydrothermal activity and the spatial dynamics of fluid-rock interaction. This approach provides a valuable complement to conventional fluid-tracing methods and opens new perspectives for reconstructing paleo-hydrothermal systems in ancient basement terrains.

Related

  1. Uncertainty in helium diffusion in zircon limits thermochronologic resolution: application to the Great Unconformity
    Matthew Fox, Adam G G Smith, Pieter Vermeesch +2
    GeochronologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeology & geochemistryHAL
  2. Monazite versus zircon U–Pb geochronology of leucogranites: A case study from the Yeongnam Massif, Korea
    Wonseok Cheong
    GEOCHEMICAL JOURNALPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedGeophysics & seismologyJ-STAGE
  3. Combining Thermochronology and Geochronology to Constrains Orogenic Processes in the Alps and Tibet
    Philippe Hervé Leloup, Antoine Mercier, Chenglong Ge
    Acta Geologica SinicaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyHAL
  4. Ediacaran Thermal Disturbance in the NW Amazonian Craton: Insights from Zircon and Apatite U–Pb Geochronology of the Guaviare Complex, Colombia
    Amed Bonilla Pérez, Nathan Cogné, Carlos Alfonso Zafra Mejía
    GeosciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text2 citedGeophysics & seismologyHAL
  5. Coupled U–Pb geochronology of inherited and detrital zircon in the Iberian Massif: insights into its deep structure and geodynamic evolution
    Pedro Cachapuz, Martim Chichorro, Telmo Bento dos Santos
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{boulogne2026dating,
  title = {{Dating circulations of hydrothermal fluids in the crystalline basements of unconformity-related metal deposits using in situ Rb ∕ Sr geochronology: proof of concept}},
  author = {Quentin Boulogne and Gaétan Milesi and Chantal Peiffert and Emmy Fischer and Christophe Ballouard and Mehdi Serdoun and Thomas Obin and Andreï Lecomte and Pierre Martz and Andrew Kaczowka and Julien Mercadier},
  journal = {Geochronology},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.5194/gchron-8-387-2026},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05779400v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dating circulations of hydrothermal fluids in the crystalline basements of unconformity-related metal deposits using in situ Rb ∕ Sr geochronology: proof of concept
AU  - Quentin Boulogne
AU  - Gaétan Milesi
AU  - Chantal Peiffert
AU  - Emmy Fischer
AU  - Christophe Ballouard
AU  - Mehdi Serdoun
AU  - Thomas Obin
AU  - Andreï Lecomte
AU  - Pierre Martz
AU  - Andrew Kaczowka
AU  - Julien Mercadier
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/08
JO  - Geochronology
DO  - 10.5194/gchron-8-387-2026
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05779400v1
AB  - The use of in situ Rb–Sr geochronology has boomed in recent years following its implementation using LA-ICP-MS/MS technology, which enables fast, in situ analyses at the micron scale on selected minerals. The Rb–Sr geochronometer applied to micas is now commonly used to date the crystallization or cooling of metamorphic and magmatic rocks, based on the assumptions of a closed isotope system after passing the closure temperature and of a homogeneous Sr isotopic composition at the time of crystallization. In situ Rb–Sr geochronology applied to micas and related alteration products in geological contexts involving hydrothermal fluid circulation affecting micas after crystallization could provide a new way to decipher the timing and duration of fluid circulation in various settings such as mountain belts or sedimentary basins. The behavior and applicability of the Rb–Sr system in such contexts are, however, poorly understood, as the system may be partially reopened with differential redistribution of Rb and Sr at the grain scale. To test this hypothesis, we selected a case study related to unconformity-related U deposits from the Athabasca Basin (Canada), which formed through intense hydrothermal fluid circulation at the interface between crystalline basement and siliciclastic sedimentary rocks and represent archetypes of unconformity-related metal deposits. Muscovite grains from metamorphic and magmatic rocks were targeted across a range of alteration states, from hydrothermally unaltered to strongly altered domains. We focused on a specific hydrothermal alteration linked to the formation of hydrothermal illite and sudoite at the expense of metamorphic or magmatic minerals. In unaltered zones, muscovite displays variable but high Rb / Sr ratios, whereas the 87 Sr / 86 Sr intercepts derived from Rb–Sr regressions are scattered and are not interpreted as meaningful initial isotopic compositions. The resulting ages range from ca. 1870 to ca. 1720 Ma and are consistent with the geological context. In distal-to-proximal alteration halos of U deposits, muscovite and related alteration products yield lower 87 Rb / 86 Sr ratios and highly variable regression intercepts. The mean age calculated across the different samples and investigated sites clusters around ∼ 1640 Ma, a value previously obtained by Ar–Ar geochronology on illite and U–Pb geochronology on other hydrothermal phases and proposed to correspond to a major hydrothermal event linked to a geodynamic reorganization affecting the Canadian Shield at the circum-Laurentian scale. The ∼ 1640 Ma age is geologically meaningful in the studied context and is interpreted as reflecting partial, micrometric-scale resetting of the Rb–Sr system in muscovite during this hydrothermal event. The wide range of regression intercept values commonly observed in disturbed Rb–Sr systems is interpreted as an apparent result of open-system behavior, reflecting partial system reopening and non-conservative redistribution of Rb and Sr at the grain scale, rather than as a physically meaningful initial isotopic composition. These results demonstrate that detailed analysis of Rb–Sr system perturbations in altered muscovite and related alteration products can constrain the timing of ancient hydrothermal activity and the spatial dynamics of fluid-rock interaction. This approach provides a valuable complement to conventional fluid-tracing methods and opens new perspectives for reconstructing paleo-hydrothermal systems in ancient basement terrains.
SN  - 2628-3697
SN  - 2628-3719
ER  -