Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintCC BYChemRxiv

Influence of exchange–correlation functional on machine-learnt interatomic potentials accuracy: a systematic study in borosilicate glasses

  1. 1Chimie ParisTech, PSL University, CNRS, Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris
  2. 2Sorbonne Université,

Abstract

Machine-learnt interatomic potential (MLIP) has emerged as a strategy to accelerate molecular simulations, offering the promise of quantum chemical accuracy at a cost close to that of classical force fields. They are commonly trained on reference data obtained at the DFT level, which is itself a sufficiently affordable method to generate thousands of configurations and associated energies and atomic forces. However, this approach suffers from an elephant in the room, which is rarely addressed: the choice of exchange–correlation functional. Although it is understood to have a crucial impact on the accuracy of the description of interactions and therefore on the results of the molecular simulations, it has not been systematically evaluated in the past. To go beyond simple benchmarks on selected configurations, we set out to understand the influence of exchange–correlation (XC) functional on the training of MLIPs, and more importantly on the physical properties of the resulting condensed matter systems. As a complex chemical system to test this, we selected borosilicate glasses of a wide variety of compositions. We produced reference data sets of borosilicate glasses with nine different chemical compositions, with five different XC functionals at the GGA, meta-GGA and hybrid levels. We then trained MLIPs for all of them, produced glasses by melt-quenching, and compared their physical and structural properties with available experimental data. We show that there are significant differences between the different functionals. While the influence on bulk properties such as glass densities is minor, fine structural properties are more sensitive to the choice of functional, in particular when it comes to the coordination of boron atoms. Our results show how MLIPs can help us better understand the strengths and weaknesses of DFT functionals, where investigation through direct ab initio molecular dynamics was too expensive in the past. It also highlights that MLIPs depend on the ground truth on which they are trained, a fact often overlooked in practice, and this influence may be drastic on specific physical properties.

Related

  1. Influence of Exchange–Correlation Functional on Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials’ Accuracy: A Systematic Study of Borosilicate Glasses
    Fengming Shi, Luca Brugnoli, François-Xavier Coudert
    Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersTheoretical & computational chemistryHAL
  2. Predicting Thermophysical Properties of Halide Salts Using On-the-Fly Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials Across Multiple Exchange-Correlation Functionals
    Pritam Rudra, Sudarshan Vijay, Ojus Mohan +1
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersChemRxiv
  3. Machine-learned Laplacian-level density functional from exact exchange-correlation potentials and energies
    Arghadwip Paul, Bikash Kanungo, Sambit Das +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryarXiv
  4. Nonempirical Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Framework for Nonlocal Exchange--Correlation Potentials
    Zhandos A. Moldabekov, Michele Pavanello, Thomas D. Gawne +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Correcting the Liquid Densities of Universal Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials Using Local-Number-Density Repulsion
    Shunsuke Mieda
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{shi2026influence,
  title = {{Influence of exchange–correlation functional on machine-learnt interatomic potentials accuracy: a systematic study in borosilicate glasses}},
  author = {Fengming Shi and Luca Brugnoli and François-Xavier Coudert},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15002879/v2},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15002879/v2},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Influence of exchange–correlation functional on machine-learnt interatomic potentials accuracy: a systematic study in borosilicate glasses
AU  - Fengming Shi
AU  - Luca Brugnoli
AU  - François-Xavier Coudert
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15002879/v2
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15002879/v2
AB  - Machine-learnt interatomic potential (MLIP) has emerged as a strategy to accelerate molecular simulations, offering the promise of quantum chemical accuracy at a cost close to that of classical force fields. They are commonly trained on reference data obtained at the DFT level, which is itself a sufficiently affordable method to generate thousands of configurations and associated energies and atomic forces. However, this approach suffers from an elephant in the room, which is rarely addressed: the choice of exchange–correlation functional. Although it is understood to have a crucial impact on the accuracy of the description of interactions and therefore on the results of the molecular simulations, it has not been systematically evaluated in the past. To go beyond simple benchmarks on selected configurations, we set out to understand the influence of exchange–correlation (XC) functional on the training of MLIPs, and more importantly on the physical properties of the resulting condensed matter systems. As a complex chemical system to test this, we selected borosilicate glasses of a wide variety of compositions. We produced reference data sets of borosilicate glasses with nine different chemical compositions, with five different XC functionals at the GGA, meta-GGA and hybrid levels. We then trained MLIPs for all of them, produced glasses by melt-quenching, and compared their physical and structural properties with available experimental data. We show that there are significant differences between the different functionals. While the influence on bulk properties such as glass densities is minor, fine structural properties are more sensitive to the choice of functional, in particular when it comes to the coordination of boron atoms. Our results show how MLIPs can help us better understand the strengths and weaknesses of DFT functionals, where investigation through direct ab initio molecular dynamics was too expensive in the past. It also highlights that MLIPs depend on the ground truth on which they are trained, a fact often overlooked in practice, and this influence may be drastic on specific physical properties.
ER  -