Association of dietary fiber intake with current asthma and recent asthma outcomes: a cross-sectional analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–March 2020 pre-pandemic data
- 1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Zhuji People’s Hospital, Zhejiang, China
Abstract
Objective: Dietary fiber may influence asthma through the gut-lung axis and systemic inflammation, but evidence in contemporary U.S. adults remains limited.
Methods: We analyzed 6,145 adults aged 20 years or older from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–March 2020 pre-pandemic data using a common complete-case sample for the staged regression models. Day-1 dietary fiber was the primary exposure; a separate 2-day mean sensitivity analysis was conducted in 5,364 participants with a reliable second recall. Survey-weighted logistic regression assessed current asthma, asthma attacks and asthma-related acute-care visits with adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, energy-intake and clinical covariates; body mass index (BMI) was evaluated separately. False-discovery-rate correction across the three outcomes and multiple imputation were used as sensitivity analyses.
Results: Current asthma was present in 596 participants (weighted prevalence, 8.7%). Each 1-standard-deviation increase in Day-1 fiber was associated with lower odds of current asthma in the primary model (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.99; P = 0.043), but not after false-discovery-rate correction (q = 0.129). BMI adjustment yielded OR 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66–1.02; P = 0.076). Separate repeated-recall and multiple-imputation analyses were directionally consistent (2-day mean: OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61–0.90; multiple imputation: OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66–0.99). Fiber was not associated with asthma attacks or acute-care visits.
Conclusion: Higher reported fiber intake showed an inverse association with current asthma, but statistical evidence was modest after multiple-outcome correction. Repeated-recall and missing-data analyses were directionally consistent. Cross-sectional design, reverse causation and residual confounding preclude causal interpretation.
Related
- Association Between Aerobic Physical Activity and Hypertension Among U.S. Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) 2021-2023
- Association Between Sleep Duration and Obesity Phenotypes in Apparently Healthy Korean Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013–2015
- Joint Association of Sedentary Time and Physical Activity with Metabolic Syndrome Among Korean Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2024 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
- Association of the C-reactive protein–triglyceride glucose index with self-reported stroke among U.S. adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
- Association Between Dietary Vitamin Intake and Short Sleep Duration Among Adults in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 2021-2023 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) Data
BibTeX
@article{zhao2026association,
title = {{Association of dietary fiber intake with current asthma and recent asthma outcomes: a cross-sectional analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–March 2020 pre-pandemic data}},
author = {Tingting Zhao},
journal = {Food \& Nutrition Research},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.29219/fnr.v70.14782},
url = {https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v70.14782},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Association of dietary fiber intake with current asthma and recent asthma outcomes: a cross-sectional analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–March 2020 pre-pandemic data
AU - Tingting Zhao
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Food & Nutrition Research
DO - 10.29219/fnr.v70.14782
UR - https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v70.14782
AB - Objective: Dietary fiber may influence asthma through the gut-lung axis and systemic inflammation, but evidence in contemporary U.S. adults remains limited. Methods: We analyzed 6,145 adults aged 20 years or older from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–March 2020 pre-pandemic data using a common complete-case sample for the staged regression models. Day-1 dietary fiber was the primary exposure; a separate 2-day mean sensitivity analysis was conducted in 5,364 participants with a reliable second recall. Survey-weighted logistic regression assessed current asthma, asthma attacks and asthma-related acute-care visits with adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, energy-intake and clinical covariates; body mass index (BMI) was evaluated separately. False-discovery-rate correction across the three outcomes and multiple imputation were used as sensitivity analyses. Results: Current asthma was present in 596 participants (weighted prevalence, 8.7%). Each 1-standard-deviation increase in Day-1 fiber was associated with lower odds of current asthma in the primary model (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.99; P = 0.043), but not after false-discovery-rate correction (q = 0.129). BMI adjustment yielded OR 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66–1.02; P = 0.076). Separate repeated-recall and multiple-imputation analyses were directionally consistent (2-day mean: OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61–0.90; multiple imputation: OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66–0.99). Fiber was not associated with asthma attacks or acute-care visits. Conclusion: Higher reported fiber intake showed an inverse association with current asthma, but statistical evidence was modest after multiple-outcome correction. Repeated-recall and missing-data analyses were directionally consistent. Cross-sectional design, reverse causation and residual confounding preclude causal interpretation.
SN - 1654-661X
ER -