Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular Systems Biology

Validation and analysis of 12,000 AI-driven CAR-T designs in the Bits to Binders competition

88 more authors

60 listed; 100 in total.

35 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
  2. 2The BioML Society, Austin, TX, USA
  3. 3LifEngine Animal Health (LEAH) Laboratories Incorporated, Minneapolis, MN, USA
  4. 4Department of Materials, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  5. 5University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
  6. 6Imperial College London, London, UK
  7. 7Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  8. 8University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  9. 9Institute for Drug Discovery, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
  10. 10EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
  11. 11University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
  12. 12Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
  13. 13Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czechia
  14. 14University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
  15. 15University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  16. 16University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
  17. 17Virtue Therapeutics, Gurugram, India
  18. 18University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
  19. 19McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
  20. 20Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
  21. 21Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
  22. 22Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  23. 23Gensaic, Cambridge, MA, USA
  24. 24Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
  25. 25University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
  26. 26University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
  27. 27Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
  28. 28University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  29. 29Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
  30. 30Myriad Genetics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  31. 31Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
  32. 32Aibio AB, Klagshamn, Sweden
  33. 33Boltzmann Labs, Hyderabad, India
  34. 34National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  35. 35Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) methods for proteins have advanced rapidly, improving structure prediction and design, particularly for de novo binders. However, most evaluations emphasize binding affinity rather than higher-order biological function. We present Bits to Binders , a global competition evaluating de novo binder design in the context of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Teams from 42 countries submitted 12,000 designs of 80-amino acid de novo minibinders targeting human CD20 as CAR binding domains. Designs were screened by pooled CAR-T proliferation, identifying 707 designs exhibiting significant CD20-specific enrichment, with team hit rates from 0.6% to 38.4%. Top-performing candidates were validated as individual constructs, measuring CD20-specific proliferation, expansion, cytokine production, and targeted cell lysis. We identified common design methodologies and factors correlated with DNA synthesis, expression, and target-specific T cell activation which nearly double the success rates when applied as a retrospective filter. We release this dataset as an open resource, with practical recommendations to support more effective AI-driven binder design.

Related

  1. Metabolic Competition-Driven Antitumor Immunity of glpX-Deficient Engineered Salmonella via Glucose Deprivation and STING Activation in Bladder Cancer
    Leyang Wu, Xinyue Qiao, Wanru Wang +13
    Cancer communicationsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. A preliminar validation-driven experimental–numerical framework for vaginal delivery simulation
    Marine Bekrar, Yves Vallet, Ana-Sofia Tavera Pelaez +6
    Multidisciplinary Biomechanics JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsHAL
  3. New potassium binders: we need them—we do not need them
    Clinical kidney journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Domain-resolved epitope mapping of B7-H3-targeting VHH-Fcs defines isoform-selective binders for antibody-drug conjugate development
    X. Fang, B. Chalopin, S. S. Gokturk +14
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textOncologybioRxiv
  5. Deep Learning–driven Segmentation of Breast Cancer MR Imaging Using a Hybrid ResNet–Transformer Architecture and Cross-dataset Validation
    Yongjian Sui, Peiru Li, Jiacheng Li +2
    Magnetic Resonance in Medical SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyJ-STAGE
BibTeX
@article{kosonocky2026validation,
  title = {{Validation and analysis of 12,000 AI-driven CAR-T designs in the Bits to Binders competition}},
  author = {Clayton W. Kosonocky and Alex M. Abel and Aaron L. Feller and Amanda Cifuentes Rieffer and Phillip R. Woolley and Jakub Lála and Delbert S. Barth and Tynan Gardner and Bits to Binders Competitors and Daniel Acosta and Stefano Angioletti‐Uberti and Vinayak Annapure and Neil Anthony and Rana A Barghout and Max Beining and Parth Bibekar and Dionessa Biton and Patrick Bryant and Anton Bushuiev and Cianna N. Calia and Ava Chan and Jie Chen and Akshay Chenna and Nicole Chiang and Vivian Chu and Joseph Clark and Alia Clark‐ElSayed and Elliot Cole and Qian Cong and Shreyasi Das and Tanner Dean and Tyler Derr and Alejandro Diaz and Jesse Durham and Moritz Ertelt and Antonio Fonseca and Ora Schueler‐Furman and Tynan Gardner and Jokent T. Gaza and Nathaniel Greenwood and Rui Guo and Abel Gurung and Vivian Haas and Seyed Alireza Hashemi and Dieter Hoffmann and Sofiia Hoian and Corey Howe and Calvin XiaoYang Hu and Jinling Huang and Nader Ibrahim and Satoshi Ishida and Ansar Ahmad Javed and Aswini Javvadi and Roman Jerala and Daksh Joshi and Even Kiely and Haelyn Kim and Diego Kleiman and Sarah Knapp and Huan Koh},
  journal = {Molecular Systems Biology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s44320-026-00246-1},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1038/s44320-026-00246-1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Validation and analysis of 12,000 AI-driven CAR-T designs in the Bits to Binders competition
AU  - Clayton W. Kosonocky
AU  - Alex M. Abel
AU  - Aaron L. Feller
AU  - Amanda Cifuentes Rieffer
AU  - Phillip R. Woolley
AU  - Jakub Lála
AU  - Delbert S. Barth
AU  - Tynan Gardner
AU  - Bits to Binders Competitors
AU  - Daniel Acosta
AU  - Stefano Angioletti‐Uberti
AU  - Vinayak Annapure
AU  - Neil Anthony
AU  - Rana A Barghout
AU  - Max Beining
AU  - Parth Bibekar
AU  - Dionessa Biton
AU  - Patrick Bryant
AU  - Anton Bushuiev
AU  - Cianna N. Calia
AU  - Ava Chan
AU  - Jie Chen
AU  - Akshay Chenna
AU  - Nicole Chiang
AU  - Vivian Chu
AU  - Joseph Clark
AU  - Alia Clark‐ElSayed
AU  - Elliot Cole
AU  - Qian Cong
AU  - Shreyasi Das
AU  - Tanner Dean
AU  - Tyler Derr
AU  - Alejandro Diaz
AU  - Jesse Durham
AU  - Moritz Ertelt
AU  - Antonio Fonseca
AU  - Ora Schueler‐Furman
AU  - Tynan Gardner
AU  - Jokent T. Gaza
AU  - Nathaniel Greenwood
AU  - Rui Guo
AU  - Abel Gurung
AU  - Vivian Haas
AU  - Seyed Alireza Hashemi
AU  - Dieter Hoffmann
AU  - Sofiia Hoian
AU  - Corey Howe
AU  - Calvin XiaoYang Hu
AU  - Jinling Huang
AU  - Nader Ibrahim
AU  - Satoshi Ishida
AU  - Ansar Ahmad Javed
AU  - Aswini Javvadi
AU  - Roman Jerala
AU  - Daksh Joshi
AU  - Even Kiely
AU  - Haelyn Kim
AU  - Diego Kleiman
AU  - Sarah Knapp
AU  - Huan Koh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
JO  - Molecular Systems Biology
DO  - 10.1038/s44320-026-00246-1
UR  - https://link.springer.com/10.1038/s44320-026-00246-1
AB  - Artificial intelligence (AI) methods for proteins have advanced rapidly, improving structure prediction and design, particularly for de novo binders. However, most evaluations emphasize binding affinity rather than higher-order biological function. We present Bits to Binders , a global competition evaluating de novo binder design in the context of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Teams from 42 countries submitted 12,000 designs of 80-amino acid de novo minibinders targeting human CD20 as CAR binding domains. Designs were screened by pooled CAR-T proliferation, identifying 707 designs exhibiting significant CD20-specific enrichment, with team hit rates from 0.6% to 38.4%. Top-performing candidates were validated as individual constructs, measuring CD20-specific proliferation, expansion, cytokine production, and targeted cell lysis. We identified common design methodologies and factors correlated with DNA synthesis, expression, and target-specific T cell activation which nearly double the success rates when applied as a retrospective filter. We release this dataset as an open resource, with practical recommendations to support more effective AI-driven binder design.
SN  - 1744-4292
ER  -