Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Building local readiness for the integrated suicide prevention act in the Netherlands

Abstract

Issue: From January 2026, suicide prevention is a statutory municipal task in the Netherlands under the Integrated Suicide Prevention Act. This shift places a complex public health responsibility at local level, where expertise, capacity and organizational structures vary widely. 113 Suicide Prevention, Association of Netherlands Municipalities and GGD GHOR Nederland developed a national support program to enable municipalities to develop effective, evidence‑based suicide prevention policies. This program is relevant internationally as many countries move toward decentralized suicide prevention governance.

Problem description: The program supports municipalities and GGDs with regional data reports, training, networking sessions, an online community platform and policy toolkit to strengthen governance, improve capacity and promote coherent regional approaches. A baseline survey was conducted in 2025 among all 25 GGDs to assess organization, political support, resources, needs and familiarity with evidence-based models. A follow up measurement at the end of 2026 will evaluate program effects.

Results: Baseline findings show strong municipal interest but large differences in preparedness. Suicide prevention is regionally organized in 9 regions. Most others are locally organized or largely unstructured. Political support is present in 24 regions, often without concrete plans or resources. Governance structures are mostly absent or informal. Budget availability is uneven and often limited. Most regions are familiar with evidence-based models. Key barriers include unclear roles, limited capacity, financial uncertainty and low perceived urgency. Success factors include broad ownership, coordination and data use.

Lessons: Municipalities benefit from clear structures, practical tools, reliable data and coordinated regional collaboration. Standardized tools combined with shared learning offer a transferable model for countries developing decentralized suicide prevention systems.

Key messages: • National and regional support strengthens municipalities in meeting new legal duties for suicide prevention, providing evidence‑based tools, data, and training.

• Baseline findings shows large variation in municipal readiness; tailored support is essential for effective national implementation.

Related

  1. Stakeholders' perspectives on communication gaps in cervical cancer prevention among women of Turkish, Moroccan and Syrian origin: a focus group study in the Netherlands.
    Tharsini Veeravagu, Nora Hamdiui, Mart L Stein +5
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Suicide prevention and social media: stepping fully into the digital age?
    Manon Leloup, Charles-Édouard Notredame, Margot Morgiève
    La Revue de Santé Scolaire et UniversitairePeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textSystems & synthetic biologyPsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  3. Low-threshold secondary and tertiary suicide prevention measures for individuals with suicid-related thoughts and behaviors: a scoping review
    Cora Spahn, Lena Spangenberg, Clara Sturbeck +2
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. “We need all the support we can get”: a rapid qualitative analysis of cross-national LGBTQ+ perspectives on social support, mental health, and suicide prevention
    Alicia A. Dahl, Meagan Zarwell, Skyler D. Prowten +8
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. School-based prevention of digital and gambling-related harms: an example from the Netherlands
    K Boode
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{luijten2026building,
  title = {{Building local readiness for the integrated suicide prevention act in the Netherlands}},
  author = {CC Luijten and N Tak and S Commandeur and E Elzinga and M Smit van Prooijen},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1945},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1945},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Building local readiness for the integrated suicide prevention act in the Netherlands
AU  - CC Luijten
AU  - N Tak
AU  - S Commandeur
AU  - E Elzinga
AU  - M Smit van Prooijen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1945
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1945
AB  - Issue: From January 2026, suicide prevention is a statutory municipal task in the Netherlands under the Integrated Suicide Prevention Act. This shift places a complex public health responsibility at local level, where expertise, capacity and organizational structures vary widely. 113 Suicide Prevention, Association of Netherlands Municipalities and GGD GHOR Nederland developed a national support program to enable municipalities to develop effective, evidence‑based suicide prevention policies. This program is relevant internationally as many countries move toward decentralized suicide prevention governance.  Problem description: The program supports municipalities and GGDs with regional data reports, training, networking sessions, an online community platform and policy toolkit to strengthen governance, improve capacity and promote coherent regional approaches. A baseline survey was conducted in 2025 among all 25 GGDs to assess organization, political support, resources, needs and familiarity with evidence-based models. A follow up measurement at the end of 2026 will evaluate program effects.  Results: Baseline findings show strong municipal interest but large differences in preparedness. Suicide prevention is regionally organized in 9 regions. Most others are locally organized or largely unstructured. Political support is present in 24 regions, often without concrete plans or resources. Governance structures are mostly absent or informal. Budget availability is uneven and often limited. Most regions are familiar with evidence-based models. Key barriers include unclear roles, limited capacity, financial uncertainty and low perceived urgency. Success factors include broad ownership, coordination and data use.  Lessons: Municipalities benefit from clear structures, practical tools, reliable data and coordinated regional collaboration. Standardized tools combined with shared learning offer a transferable model for countries developing decentralized suicide prevention systems.  Key messages: • National and regional support strengthens municipalities in meeting new legal duties for suicide prevention, providing evidence‑based tools, data, and training.  • Baseline findings shows large variation in municipal readiness; tailored support is essential for effective national implementation.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -