Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Zenodo

Live In-Context Validation of LLM Vulnerabilities: An Addendum to Epistemological Resilience in Multi-Agentic AI Swarms

  1. 1Independent Researcher

Abstract

### Description

This manuscript serves as an official scientific **Addendum** and follow-up study to the previously published framework: *“Epistemological Resilience in Multi-Agentic AI Swarms: Architectural Blueprint for Adversarial Cognitive Pentesting And Strategic Corporate Risk Mitigation”* (Primary DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23458304).

This paper documents a sequential, real-time in-context validation (Live Stress-Testing) conducted on a public high-reasoning Large Language Model (LLM) interface under an unauthenticated/anonymous state. Deploying the ERA Model's adversarial framework, the investigator captured concrete empirical evidence of structural algorithmic anomalies, specifically sequential **Context Drift** and **Sycophancy Bias** loops under strict logical interrogation. The findings strongly validate the core hypothesis of the ERA framework, reinforcing the necessity of moving high-reasoning cognitive workflows into independent local hardware topologies (specifically 32 GB physical RAM configurations).

**Related Identifiers Configuration:**

- Relationship: *isSupplementTo* -> DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23458304 & *isSupplementedBy* -> DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23547029

- License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Related

  1. Epistemological Resilience in Multi-Agentic AI Swarms: Architectural Blueprint for Adversarial Cognitive Pentesting And Strategic Corporate Risk Mitigation
    Arief Hidayatullah
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textZenodo
  2. Floods and firms: Vulnerabilities and resilience to natural disasters in Europe
    Serena Fatica, Gabor Katay, Michela Rancan
    Journal of Financial StabilityPeer-reviewedCC BY77 citedClimate scienceOpenAlex
  3. Dilemma's Quetelet Technological Deficiency, Epistemological Apathy, and the Validation of BMI-C (Body Morphometric Index - Corrected) with NHANES 2015-23 Data
    André Luís Sllva Brochieri
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)PreprintCC BY35 citedPhysiologyOpenAlex
  4. Reframing clathrin-mediated viral entry: evidence standards, context dependence and host-directed vulnerabilities.
    Qinying Wang, Liran Xu, Yangang Sun +2
    Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCell biologyEurope PMC
  5. Oncogenic RAS as an adaptive signaling ecosystem: context-dependent vulnerabilities and resistance-informed therapeutic design
    Amir Abbas Hamidi, Omeed Moaven, Reihaneh Alsadat Mahmoudian +1
    Experimental Hematology & OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{hidayatullah2026live,
  title = {{Live In-Context Validation of LLM Vulnerabilities: An Addendum to Epistemological Resilience in Multi-Agentic AI Swarms}},
  author = {Arief Hidayatullah},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23546347},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23546347},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Live In-Context Validation of LLM Vulnerabilities: An Addendum to Epistemological Resilience in Multi-Agentic AI Swarms
AU  - Arief Hidayatullah
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23546347
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23546347
AB  - ### Description  This manuscript serves as an official scientific **Addendum** and follow-up study to the previously published framework: *“Epistemological Resilience in Multi-Agentic AI Swarms: Architectural Blueprint for Adversarial Cognitive Pentesting And Strategic Corporate Risk Mitigation”* (Primary DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23458304).  This paper documents a sequential, real-time in-context validation (Live Stress-Testing) conducted on a public high-reasoning Large Language Model (LLM) interface under an unauthenticated/anonymous state. Deploying the ERA Model's adversarial framework, the investigator captured concrete empirical evidence of structural algorithmic anomalies, specifically sequential **Context Drift** and **Sycophancy Bias** loops under strict logical interrogation. The findings strongly validate the core hypothesis of the ERA framework, reinforcing the necessity of moving high-reasoning cognitive workflows into independent local hardware topologies (specifically 32 GB physical RAM configurations).  **Related Identifiers Configuration:**  - Relationship: *isSupplementTo* -> DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23458304 & *isSupplementedBy* -> DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23547029  - License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
ER  -