Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Public Health

Six anthropometric indicators and their associations with myocardial infarction and death in Swedish automotive industry male workers followed for 28 years

Abstract

Background: Overweight, (body mass index (BMI), kg/m2) 25–30 and obesity (BMI 30+) have long been linked to an increased risk of myocardial infarction and mortality.

To better assess abdominal adiposity, several indices have been developed. However, the risk associated with each index can vary across different populations.

Methods: This study aims to investigate which body measurement, if any, exhibits the strongest associations with MI, and mortality. In 1993, a cohort of 1,000 randomly selected middle-aged Swedish men participated in a nurse-led health examination. Body measurements were recorded together alongside blood pressure readings, and a fasting blood test was conducted. A follow-up study, spanning 28 years, utilized data from the national Myocardial Infarction Register (Swedeheart) and mortality data from the Swedish Cause of Death Register. The obesity indices included body mass index, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), and sagittal abdominal diameter-to-height ratio (SADHtR). Cox proportional hazard models were employed to analyze the z-scores of the six body measurements both before and after adjusting for covariates, with outcomes assessed for first-time myocardial infarction (MI) and mortality.

Results: Data were collected for 959 men. Significant correlations were found between the six body measurements, all were associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors, myocardial infarction, and mortality. However, after adjusting for the traditional risk factors, the association with cardiovascular endpoints was diminished or vanished. WHtR emerged as a more reliable indicator, with hazard ratios (HR) of 1.31 (95% CI 1.07-1.62) for myocardial infarction and 1.27 (95% CI 1.08-1.49) for all-cause mortality although the differences were marginal.

Discussion: There is currently no consensus on which obesity indicator should be the preferred predictor of cardiovascular risk. In this study, the WHtR emerged as the more reliable predictor, albeit with marginal clinical significance.

Conclusions: In this population, after adjustment for traditional risk factors, WHtR proved to be a more reliable predictor for MI and mortality.

Versions

Related

  1. Comparative Associations of Inflammation and Nutrition-Based Indices with No-Reflow and Mortality After Primary PCI for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Ömer Bedir, Tayfur Erdoğdu, Caner Türkoğlu +4
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Associations between glycolysis related metabolites and short-term mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
    Christa Meisinger, Dennis Freuer, Philip Raake +2
    Diabetology & metabolic syndromePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. Anthropometric indicators and risk of obstructive sleep apnea : Role of HDL-C as a potential mediator
    Sheng Yue Jiang, Xue Lian Du, Zi Qian Luo +5
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  4. Associations of school food environment characteristics (availability, pricing, and marketing) with adolescents’ dietary intake and anthropometric outcomes
    Mohammadhassan Rostami, Mina Babashahi
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. ECG-Derived Synthetic Left Ventricular Mechanics Predict Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Fatal Myocardial Infarction in the General Population
    D. Corsi, J. Furst, A. D. Jamthikar +8
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textCardiovascular medicinemedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{ian2026anthropometric,
  title = {{Six anthropometric indicators and their associations with myocardial infarction and death in Swedish automotive industry male workers followed for 28 years}},
  author = {Lala Joulha Ian and Lennart Dimberg},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-29630-0},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29630-0},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Six anthropometric indicators and their associations with myocardial infarction and death in Swedish automotive industry male workers followed for 28 years
AU  - Lala Joulha Ian
AU  - Lennart Dimberg
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-29630-0
UR  - https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29630-0
AB  - Background: Overweight, (body mass index (BMI), kg/m2) 25–30 and obesity (BMI 30+) have long been linked to an increased risk of myocardial infarction and mortality.  To better assess abdominal adiposity, several indices have been developed. However, the risk associated with each index can vary across different populations.  Methods: This study aims to investigate which body measurement, if any, exhibits the strongest associations with MI, and mortality. In 1993, a cohort of 1,000 randomly selected middle-aged Swedish men participated in a nurse-led health examination. Body measurements were recorded together alongside blood pressure readings, and a fasting blood test was conducted. A follow-up study, spanning 28 years, utilized data from the national Myocardial Infarction Register (Swedeheart) and mortality data from the Swedish Cause of Death Register. The obesity indices included body mass index, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), and sagittal abdominal diameter-to-height ratio (SADHtR). Cox proportional hazard models were employed to analyze the z-scores of the six body measurements both before and after adjusting for covariates, with outcomes assessed for first-time myocardial infarction (MI) and mortality.  Results: Data were collected for 959 men. Significant correlations were found between the six body measurements, all were associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors, myocardial infarction, and mortality. However, after adjusting for the traditional risk factors, the association with cardiovascular endpoints was diminished or vanished. WHtR emerged as a more reliable indicator, with hazard ratios (HR) of 1.31 (95% CI 1.07-1.62) for myocardial infarction and 1.27 (95% CI 1.08-1.49) for all-cause mortality although the differences were marginal.  Discussion: There is currently no consensus on which obesity indicator should be the preferred predictor of cardiovascular risk. In this study, the WHtR emerged as the more reliable predictor, albeit with marginal clinical significance.  Conclusions: In this population, after adjustment for traditional risk factors, WHtR proved to be a more reliable predictor for MI and mortality.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -