Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Response to exceptional environmental situations: contributions of syndromic surveillance in France

Abstract

Background: Syndromic surveillance (SS) enables early detection of public health threats and population health monitoring. This work aimed to present tools prepared to assess short-term impact for exceptional environmental situations (EES) in France.

Methods: A literature review identified pathologies likely to occur after major environmental events. Corresponding syndromic indicators were selected from the French SS system (SurSaUD®), which includes emergency department (ED) visits (OSCOUR® network) and unplanned GP consultations (SOS Médecins [SOSM]). Lists of indicators were finalized through working groups and analysis of past experiences.

Results: Six priority EES were identified: storms, floods, wildfires, industrial accidents, earthquakes, and droughts. For each, 35–47 indicators (most of them being available for both OSCOUR® and SOSM) were classified into chapters such as digestive, respiratory, infectious diseases, and mental health. Three standard dashboard (DB) templates were developed to monitor short-term variations in the number of ED visits and SOSM medical acts, both all-cause and by indicator. Two DB allow monitoring daily variations compared to the 90 previous days for all ages (DB1) or by age groups (<15, ≥15) with supporting numerical data (DB2). The 3rd DB assesses weekly trend for all ages to enable longer-term analysis. DBs are configurable for different geographic areas and can be set up on the event day (D0) for automatic next-morning production. Additional tools map the residential areas of patients who usually visit each ED and provide typical data completeness at D + 1, aiding in the definition of surveillance areas and data interpretation. Advanced procedures include tagging event-related ED visits and SOSM consultations using predefined associated diagnostic codes.

Conclusions: DBs enable reactive health monitoring during EES, supporting decision-makers in implementing health management measures alongside other data sources.

Key messages: • Dashboards based on syndromic surveillance data are reactive tools for monitoring population health during major environmental events.

• The system’s operability depends on clear preparedness and procedures within a broader health monitoring framework involving multiple stakeholders.

Related

  1. 2018–2025 Serological study on avian influenza among occupationally exposed populations in the Poyang Lake area — the region with the highest environmental surveillance positive rate in China
    Chuang Nie, Yawei Li, Wenjing Xie +9
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. A low-cost environmental monitoring framework for climate-sensitive disease surveillance in the Peruvian Amazon
    Bryan Fernandez-Camacho, Edson J. Ascencio, Antony Barja +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Public acceptability, bioethics, and legal governance of wastewater and environmental surveillance for measles in South Africa
    R. Matanda, R. H. Holm, S. Maposa +3
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  4. Climate signal or surveillance artefact? Disentangling environmental and observation processes in Lyme borreliosis trends
    M. Grzybek, A. Bogacka, L. Kirkpatrick
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  5. Microbiological information in the precipitate and supernatant fractions after wastewater centrifugation—loss or profit for hygiene, epidemiology, and environmental surveillance?
    Karol Korzekwa, Oliwia Obuch-Woszczatyńska, Klaudia Bylińska +2
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossrefDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{methy2026response,
  title = {{Response to exceptional environmental situations: contributions of syndromic surveillance in France}},
  author = {N Méthy and I Pontais and L Simac and E Hassan and V Courtillet and M Conte and P Pirard and J Guillevic and A Mathieu},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.811},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.811},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Response to exceptional environmental situations: contributions of syndromic surveillance in France
AU  - N Méthy
AU  - I Pontais
AU  - L Simac
AU  - E Hassan
AU  - V Courtillet
AU  - M Conte
AU  - P Pirard
AU  - J Guillevic
AU  - A Mathieu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.811
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.811
AB  - Background: Syndromic surveillance (SS) enables early detection of public health threats and population health monitoring. This work aimed to present tools prepared to assess short-term impact for exceptional environmental situations (EES) in France.  Methods: A literature review identified pathologies likely to occur after major environmental events. Corresponding syndromic indicators were selected from the French SS system (SurSaUD®), which includes emergency department (ED) visits (OSCOUR® network) and unplanned GP consultations (SOS Médecins [SOSM]). Lists of indicators were finalized through working groups and analysis of past experiences.  Results: Six priority EES were identified: storms, floods, wildfires, industrial accidents, earthquakes, and droughts. For each, 35–47 indicators (most of them being available for both OSCOUR® and SOSM) were classified into chapters such as digestive, respiratory, infectious diseases, and mental health. Three standard dashboard (DB) templates were developed to monitor short-term variations in the number of ED visits and SOSM medical acts, both all-cause and by indicator. Two DB allow monitoring daily variations compared to the 90 previous days for all ages (DB1) or by age groups (<15, ≥15) with supporting numerical data (DB2). The 3rd DB assesses weekly trend for all ages to enable longer-term analysis. DBs are configurable for different geographic areas and can be set up on the event day (D0) for automatic next-morning production. Additional tools map the residential areas of patients who usually visit each ED and provide typical data completeness at D + 1, aiding in the definition of surveillance areas and data interpretation. Advanced procedures include tagging event-related ED visits and SOSM consultations using predefined associated diagnostic codes.  Conclusions: DBs enable reactive health monitoring during EES, supporting decision-makers in implementing health management measures alongside other data sources.  Key messages: • Dashboards based on syndromic surveillance data are reactive tools for monitoring population health during major environmental events.  • The system’s operability depends on clear preparedness and procedures within a broader health monitoring framework involving multiple stakeholders.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -