Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Women’s compliance with cervical cancer screening recommendations and associated barriers to participation: A cross-sectional analysis

4 affiliations
  1. 1Institute of Public Health, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia
  2. 2Gynaecology Department, Riga East Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
  3. 3Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
  4. 4Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Cervical cancer screening (CCS) programmes play a key role in the early detection of cervical cancer (CC) and in reducing related morbidity and mortality. However, both under and overscreening deviate from evidence-based guidelines and can result in more harm rather than benefit. This cross-sectional study is aimed to evaluate the compliance of the CCS target group with the national CCS programme and to identify factors associated with different screening frequencies, including sociodemographic characteristics, health status and behaviour, awareness of the prevention of CC and the venue of the study participants’ recruitment. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,279 women aged 25–70 years residing in Latvia. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess associations between CCS frequency (once every three years, biannually or more often, once every four years or less, and “do not remember”) and independent variables, such as self-assessed health, chronic diseases, smoking and binge drinking, condom use and number of sexual partners and awareness of CCS invitation frequency, understanding of the frequency and purpose of the screening test, and knowledge of HPV vaccination, as well as venue of recruitment of study participants (colposcopy patients or general population). All variables were adjusted for key sociodemographic covariates. Overscreening (biannually or more often), underscreening (once every four years or less), and not recalling CCS history were strongly associated with a lack of awareness about the national CCS guidelines (e.g., unawareness that CCS is offered every three years). Overscreening was more common among participants recruited from colposcopy clinic. The results underscored the importance of health literacy in promoting appropriate screening behaviours. Addressing knowledge gaps through accessible and culturally relevant educational interventions could advance equity and enhance the effectiveness of CC prevention strategies.

Related

  1. Is active commuting to school associated with meeting physical activity recommendations among Saudi adolescents? A cross-sectional study
    Abdulrahman I. Alaqil, Mohummed H. Alkhraiji
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Primary caregivers’ perspectives on referral compliance following school eye health screening in Eastern Nepal: a qualitative study of behavioral and health system barriers
    Binita Karki, Gauri Shankar Shrestha, Rajiv Ranjan Karn +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Smartphone addiction screening status and associated physical and neuropsychological symptoms among Syrian university students: a cross-sectional study.
    Farah Abou Kheir, Aref Jalal Eldin, Ali Hmidoush +6
    BMC public healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  4. Screening of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and its associated factors among medical university students in Lebanon: A multicenter cross-sectional study
    Omar Al Jassem, Mariam Darwish, Rami Rifi +8
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPLOS
  5. Cross-Sectional Study of Multiple Sclerosis Nurse Care in Australia: Patterns of Access, Improved Health Outcomes, and Recommendations: Part 1
    Jing Chen, Julie A. Campbell, Belinda Bardsley +5
    International Journal of MS CarePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral medicinePMC
BibTeX
@article{spriņģe2026womens,
  title = {{Women’s compliance with cervical cancer screening recommendations and associated barriers to participation: A cross-sectional analysis}},
  author = {Lauma Spriņģe and Anda Ķīvīte-Urtāne and Ļubova Tihomirova and Inese Stars and Elza Mikule and Jana Žodžika and Aija Bukova-Žideļūna and Kersti Pärna and Mari Nygard and Anneli Uusküla},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0357819},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357819},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Women’s compliance with cervical cancer screening recommendations and associated barriers to participation: A cross-sectional analysis
AU  - Lauma Spriņģe
AU  - Anda Ķīvīte-Urtāne
AU  - Ļubova Tihomirova
AU  - Inese Stars
AU  - Elza Mikule
AU  - Jana Žodžika
AU  - Aija Bukova-Žideļūna
AU  - Kersti Pärna
AU  - Mari Nygard
AU  - Anneli Uusküla
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0357819
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357819
AB  - Cervical cancer screening (CCS) programmes play a key role in the early detection of cervical cancer (CC) and in reducing related morbidity and mortality. However, both under and overscreening deviate from evidence-based guidelines and can result in more harm rather than benefit. This cross-sectional study is aimed to evaluate the compliance of the CCS target group with the national CCS programme and to identify factors associated with different screening frequencies, including sociodemographic characteristics, health status and behaviour, awareness of the prevention of CC and the venue of the study participants’ recruitment. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,279 women aged 25–70 years residing in Latvia. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess associations between CCS frequency (once every three years, biannually or more often, once every four years or less, and “do not remember”) and independent variables, such as self-assessed health, chronic diseases, smoking and binge drinking, condom use and number of sexual partners and awareness of CCS invitation frequency, understanding of the frequency and purpose of the screening test, and knowledge of HPV vaccination, as well as venue of recruitment of study participants (colposcopy patients or general population). All variables were adjusted for key sociodemographic covariates. Overscreening (biannually or more often), underscreening (once every four years or less), and not recalling CCS history were strongly associated with a lack of awareness about the national CCS guidelines (e.g., unawareness that CCS is offered every three years). Overscreening was more common among participants recruited from colposcopy clinic. The results underscored the importance of health literacy in promoting appropriate screening behaviours. Addressing knowledge gaps through accessible and culturally relevant educational interventions could advance equity and enhance the effectiveness of CC prevention strategies.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -