Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Semiparametric Inference for Conditional Shapley Feature Importance

Abstract

Shapley values are widely used for post-hoc feature attribution, but most estimators return point quantities and do not quantify uncertainty, and popular implementations sample out-of-coalition features from their marginal distribution, which misattributes importance when features are dependent. This paper studies the conditional formulation, in which out-of-coalition features are integrated out under their true conditional distribution. The target is a global, loss-based importance that pairs a conditional value function with a SAGE-style loss aggregation. We propose a one-step estimator with K-fold cross-fitting and a U-statistic correction of the squared loss that removes the Monte Carlo bias of the naive plug-in; it is √n-consistent and asymptotically normal under double-robust rate conditions, and the resulting Wald interval attains nominal coverage. A Pinsker-type bound quantifies the bias from misspecifying the working copula class, while vine copulas keep conditional sampling tractable. In a Gaussian design study with n= 500, the empirical coverage of the 95% interval lies between 0.91 and 0.96 across all features, the test holds its Type-I rate at 0.05, and it reaches power one for moderate signals. Applied to the UCI Concrete and California Housing data, the method identifies the conditionally informative features with Bonferroni-controlled significance.

Related

  1. Dirichlet Process Mixtures within Semiparametric Bayesian Networks: A Novel Conditional Density Estimation Approach
    Victor Alejandre, Pedro Larrañaga, Concha Bielza
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Semiparametric Inference for Functional Difference-in-Differences
    Junzhu Nie, Chengxiu Ling, Mengfei Ran
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Semiparametric Inference for Dynamic Causal Effects from Observational Time Series
    Shibo Yu, Yan Chen, Jin-Hong Du +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Semiparametric Efficient Inference under Non-Informative Complex Survey Designs
    Hiroki Chiba, Kosuke Morikawa
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Semiparametric inference for a Target Outcome Leveraging Heterogeneous External Summaries of Auxiliary Outcomes
    Yifei Wang, Jiayin Zheng, Christina C. Newton +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{gnasso2026semiparametric,
  title = {{Semiparametric Inference for Conditional Shapley Feature Importance}},
  author = {Agostino Gnasso},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.10313},
  eprint = {2609.10313},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10313},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Semiparametric Inference for Conditional Shapley Feature Importance
AU  - Agostino Gnasso
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.10313
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10313
AB  - Shapley values are widely used for post-hoc feature attribution, but most estimators return point quantities and do not quantify uncertainty, and popular implementations sample out-of-coalition features from their marginal distribution, which misattributes importance when features are dependent. This paper studies the conditional formulation, in which out-of-coalition features are integrated out under their true conditional distribution. The target is a global, loss-based importance that pairs a conditional value function with a SAGE-style loss aggregation. We propose a one-step estimator with K-fold cross-fitting and a U-statistic correction of the squared loss that removes the Monte Carlo bias of the naive plug-in; it is √n-consistent and asymptotically normal under double-robust rate conditions, and the resulting Wald interval attains nominal coverage. A Pinsker-type bound quantifies the bias from misspecifying the working copula class, while vine copulas keep conditional sampling tractable. In a Gaussian design study with n= 500, the empirical coverage of the 95% interval lies between 0.91 and 0.96 across all features, the test holds its Type-I rate at 0.05, and it reaches power one for moderate signals. Applied to the UCI Concrete and California Housing data, the method identifies the conditionally informative features with Bonferroni-controlled significance.
ER  -