Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Benchmarking One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Methods on Quantum Hardware

Abstract

Classical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods encounter significant computational bottlenecks in large systems and at high Reynolds number flows due to the rapid increase in degrees of freedom, even on flagship supercomputers. As quantum computers emerge, the Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Method (QLBM) has been proposed as a quantum-native alternative for solving fluid dynamics problems. However, until recently, nearly all studies have relied on classical quantum simulators rather than real quantum hardware. This study presents a benchmark of a one-dimensional QLBM implementation executed on three different IBM Quantum hardware. We design and test a quantum circuit for the advection-diffusion equation using amplitude encoding, a Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK)-type collision operator, and a streaming step with periodic boundary conditions. Our numerical experiments evaluate transpiled two-qubit gate count, total circuit depth, runtime, and accuracy metrics including maximum absolute error (L∞ norm) and root-mean-square error (RMSE). We find that the present collision and streaming operators dominate the overall cost and become the primary scalability bottleneck on current hardware. To mitigate the prohibitive cost of full quantum state tomography on hardware-based benchmarking exercises, we introduce a sampler-based measurement strategy that reconstructs macroscopic density fields directly from computational-basis measurements. This approach substantially reduces measurement overhead while preserving the expected advection-diffusion dynamics on hardware. These results provide a quantitative assessment of QLBM performance in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) regime and identify the principal algorithmic and experimental limitations that must be addressed for QLBM to become viable for fluid dynamics.

Related

  1. Hardware Demonstration of Neural-Surrogated Quantum-Enhanced MCMC for Large-Scale Constrained Boltzmann Sampling
    Yuya Kawamata, Keisuke Fujii
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Simulating two-Dimensional decaying vortex structure with the Carleman-Lattice-Boltzmann method
    Luca Cappelli, Massimo Berneschi, Sauro Succi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Quantum lattice Boltzmann method via density-matrix encoding for fluid simulation with wall boundary conditions
    Hao Su, Boyuan Wang, Yue Yang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Rotation Collision based Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Methods
    Kangyang Zeng, Changshen Huang, Xi Liu +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textFluid dynamicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Conservation-Syndrome Quantum Error Correction for Lattice-Boltzmann Quantum Algorithms
    Muhammad Idrees Khan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textComputational physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{quartey2026benchmarking,
  title = {{Benchmarking One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Methods on Quantum Hardware}},
  author = {Melvina Quartey and Lucy T. Zhang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.40851},
  eprint = {2610.40851},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40851},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Benchmarking One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Methods on Quantum Hardware
AU  - Melvina Quartey
AU  - Lucy T. Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.40851
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40851
AB  - Classical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods encounter significant computational bottlenecks in large systems and at high Reynolds number flows due to the rapid increase in degrees of freedom, even on flagship supercomputers. As quantum computers emerge, the Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Method (QLBM) has been proposed as a quantum-native alternative for solving fluid dynamics problems. However, until recently, nearly all studies have relied on classical quantum simulators rather than real quantum hardware. This study presents a benchmark of a one-dimensional QLBM implementation executed on three different IBM Quantum hardware. We design and test a quantum circuit for the advection-diffusion equation using amplitude encoding, a Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK)-type collision operator, and a streaming step with periodic boundary conditions. Our numerical experiments evaluate transpiled two-qubit gate count, total circuit depth, runtime, and accuracy metrics including maximum absolute error (L_∞ norm) and root-mean-square error (RMSE). We find that the present collision and streaming operators dominate the overall cost and become the primary scalability bottleneck on current hardware. To mitigate the prohibitive cost of full quantum state tomography on hardware-based benchmarking exercises, we introduce a sampler-based measurement strategy that reconstructs macroscopic density fields directly from computational-basis measurements. This approach substantially reduces measurement overhead while preserving the expected advection-diffusion dynamics on hardware. These results provide a quantitative assessment of QLBM performance in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) regime and identify the principal algorithmic and experimental limitations that must be addressed for QLBM to become viable for fluid dynamics.
ER  -