Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,785 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of applied clinical medical physics

Dynamic Proton arc therapy for paediatric parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Cancer Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  2. 2Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  3. 3Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  4. 4University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Abstract

Background

Parameningeal rhabdomyosarcomas (PM-RMS) are pediatric tumors with a high risk of local failure and severe toxicity. Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) offers improved healthy tissue sparing compared to conventional photon-based radiotherapy, and proton arc therapy (PAT) might offer further improvement in healthy tissue sparing for these patients, thus emphasizing the need for systematic studies specifically focusing on PM-RMS patients. Additionally, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is known to vary with linear energy transfer (LET).Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of LET-optimized PAT for PM-RMS treatment.Methods

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, IMPT and PAT plans, both with and without LET optimization were made for 13 PM-RMS patients using Raystation version 2023B. The plans were evaluated based on the achievement of clinical goals, homogeneity index, delivery time, robustness, LET and variable RBE-weighted dose within the target and selected OARs.Results

LET optimization increased the mean LET in the target from 2.5 keV/µm [2.1, 2.8] to 3.4 keV/µm [2.7, 4.1] for IMPT and from 2.8 keV/µm [2.5, 3.1] to 3.4 keV/µm [2.7, 4.0] for PAT with minor changes in dose distributions. Target coverage and OAR doses were comparable between IMPT and PAT, while both had an expected improvement in OAR sparing compared to VMAT. Delivery times were 134.5 [95.3, 203.7] seconds for the IMPT plans and 197.4 [138.9, 244.6] seconds for the PAT plans before LET optimization, and were for both modalities reduced by around 2-5 seconds after LET optimization.Conclusions

The dose distribution was similar across PAT and IMPT in this study, and superior compared to VMAT. LET optimization in the proton plans achieved LET improvements in both target and OARs without compromising dose.

Related

  1. Radiation-Induced Contrast Enhancement After Proton Therapy for Paediatric Brain Tumours: Association with Variable Relative Biological Effectiveness and Linear Energy Transfer.
    Julian Brack, Valon Gllareva, Bastian von Nettelbladt +12
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Therapeutic Plasma Exchange as Salvage Therapy in Paediatric Fulminant Hepatitis A Complicated by Acute Kidney Injury and Multidrug-Resistant Pneumonia: A Case Report
    Yatri Patel, Vatsal Goswami, Uttam Gondalia +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  3. Evolving role of proton therapy in contemporary oncology
    Emily S. Lebow, Helen A. Shih
    CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. A study protocol for international consensus guidelines on music therapy for paediatric posterior fossa syndrome
    James Burns, Jonathan Pool, Karen Twyford +5
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClinical trials & evidence synthesisOncologyPLOS
  5. A Refractory Deep Gastric Ulcer after Proton Beam Therapy
    Hayato Fujita, Tsuyoshi Suda, Kenkei Hasatani +1
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineJ-STAGE
BibTeX
@article{handeland2026dynamic,
  title = {{Dynamic Proton arc therapy for paediatric parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma.}},
  author = {Andreas Havsgård Handeland and Hardev Singh Grewal and Camilla Grindeland Boer and Daniel J Indelicato and Kristian Smeland Ytre-Hauge and Helge Henjum and Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg},
  journal = {Journal of applied clinical medical physics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/acm2.70867},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900561},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dynamic Proton arc therapy for paediatric parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma.
AU  - Andreas Havsgård Handeland
AU  - Hardev Singh Grewal
AU  - Camilla Grindeland Boer
AU  - Daniel J Indelicato
AU  - Kristian Smeland Ytre-Hauge
AU  - Helge Henjum
AU  - Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Journal of applied clinical medical physics
DO  - 10.1002/acm2.70867
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900561
AB  - Background  Parameningeal rhabdomyosarcomas (PM-RMS) are pediatric tumors with a high risk of local failure and severe toxicity. Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) offers improved healthy tissue sparing compared to conventional photon-based radiotherapy, and proton arc therapy (PAT) might offer further improvement in healthy tissue sparing for these patients, thus emphasizing the need for systematic studies specifically focusing on PM-RMS patients. Additionally, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is known to vary with linear energy transfer (LET).Purpose  The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of LET-optimized PAT for PM-RMS treatment.Methods  Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, IMPT and PAT plans, both with and without LET optimization were made for 13 PM-RMS patients using Raystation version 2023B. The plans were evaluated based on the achievement of clinical goals, homogeneity index, delivery time, robustness, LET and variable RBE-weighted dose within the target and selected OARs.Results  LET optimization increased the mean LET in the target from 2.5 keV/µm [2.1, 2.8] to 3.4 keV/µm [2.7, 4.1] for IMPT and from 2.8 keV/µm [2.5, 3.1] to 3.4 keV/µm [2.7, 4.0] for PAT with minor changes in dose distributions. Target coverage and OAR doses were comparable between IMPT and PAT, while both had an expected improvement in OAR sparing compared to VMAT. Delivery times were 134.5 [95.3, 203.7] seconds for the IMPT plans and 197.4 [138.9, 244.6] seconds for the PAT plans before LET optimization, and were for both modalities reduced by around 2-5 seconds after LET optimization.Conclusions  The dose distribution was similar across PAT and IMPT in this study, and superior compared to VMAT. LET optimization in the proton plans achieved LET improvements in both target and OARs without compromising dose.
SN  - 1526-9914
ER  -