Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYRheumatology advances in practice

P017 Serial DXA Monitoring in Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Bone Loss: A Decade of Progressive Bone Loss, Stabilisation with Bisphosphonate Therapy and Recovery Following Endocrine Therapy Cessation

Abstract

Introduction: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) substantially reduce breast cancer recurrence but accelerate bone loss through profound oestrogen deprivation. International guidelines recommend fracture risk assessment, serial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), optimisation of calcium and vitamin D, and anti-resorptive therapy when indicated. Despite these measures, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal management of patients who continue to lose bone mineral density (BMD) during AI therapy. We present a 10-year longitudinal case illustrating how serial DXA surveillance informed management, demonstrated the natural history of AI-induced bone loss, and reinforced the importance of multidisciplinary care throughout breast cancer survivorship.

Case description: A 55-year-old woman was diagnosed with Grade 3 ER-positive, PR-positive, HER2-negative invasive ductal breast carcinoma at 41 years of age. Treatment included neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FEC followed by Taxotere), breast-conserving surgery, bilateral oophorectomy, tamoxifen, and letrozole from April 2015 to June 2023.

At commencement of letrozole, her only recognised osteoporosis risk factors were low BMI (21 kg/m²) and profound oestrogen deprivation following bilateral oophorectomy. BMI subsequently improved to approximately 22 kg/m². She had no previous fragility fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, excess alcohol intake, recurrent falls, glucocorticoid exposure or family history of hip fracture. Secondary causes of osteoporosis were repeatedly excluded whenever further BMD decline was observed.

Baseline DXA demonstrated lumbar spine BMD 1.036 g/cm² (T-score −1.36) and femoral neck BMD 0.876 g/cm² (T-score −0.86). The first surveillance DXA, performed two years after initiating letrozole in accordance with AI-induced bone loss (AIBL) guidance, demonstrated a marked decline in lumbar spine BMD to 0.927 g/cm² (T-score −2.1), representing an annual loss of 4.3%, with femoral neck BMD declining to 0.828 g/cm² (T-score −1.3). In response to this significant deterioration, oral risedronate was commenced, while calcium and vitamin D supplementation were continued. The patient remained fully compliant with treatment throughout follow-up.

Subsequent serial DXA demonstrated marked slowing and stabilisation of bone loss, with lumbar spine BMD measuring 0.897 g/cm² (T-score −2.4) in 2019 and 0.882 g/cm² (T-score −2.5) in 2021, while femoral neck BMD remained largely stable (0.839 and 0.843 g/cm², respectively). Following discontinuation of letrozole in 2023, lumbar spine BMD improved to 0.918 g/cm² (T-score −2.4), with stable femoral neck BMD (0.845 g/cm²; T-score −1.4), despite no additional osteoporosis treatment. Importantly, she remained fracture-free throughout follow-up.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text

P017 Figure 1

Discussion: This case highlights the value of serial DXA surveillance in understanding the trajectory of aromatase inhibitor-induced bone loss (AIBL) and supporting clinical decision-making. The most striking finding was the rapid decline in lumbar spine BMD within the first two years of letrozole therapy, despite calcium and vitamin D supplementation. This prompted initiation of oral risedronate in accordance with current AIBL guidance.

Following commencement of risedronate, serial DXA demonstrated stabilisation of bone loss, with a marked reduction in the rate of lumbar spine decline and preservation of femoral BMD. The patient remained fully compliant with treatment, sustained no fragility fractures, and repeated assessment excluded secondary causes of osteoporosis. These findings suggest that anti-resorptive therapy effectively attenuated further skeletal deterioration during continued aromatase inhibitor exposure.

This case also highlights the challenge of interpreting serial DXA findings during prolonged endocrine therapy. Although lumbar spine BMD remained in the osteoporotic range, the absence of fractures, stable BMD trajectory following risedronate, low overall fracture risk and anticipated completion of endocrine therapy supported continuation of guideline-based management rather than escalation to more potent anti-resorptive or anabolic therapy. The subsequent improvement in lumbar spine BMD following discontinuation of letrozole reinforces the central role of persistent oestrogen deprivation in AI-induced bone loss and suggests that recovery may not occur until endocrine therapy has been completed.

Importantly, this case reinforces the value of multidisciplinary collaboration between oncology and metabolic bone services. Regular DXA surveillance enabled timely intervention, informed shared decision-making and prevented fragility fractures throughout treatment. It also provides a practical learning point for clinicians: during ongoing aromatase inhibitor therapy, stabilisation of BMD may represent an appropriate therapeutic response, while meaningful recovery may only be expected after cessation of endocrine therapy.

Key learning points: • Serial DXA monitoring provides valuable insight into the trajectory of AI-induced bone loss and informs treatment decisions.

• The greatest lumbar spine BMD decline may occur during the first two years of aromatase inhibitor therapy.

• Bisphosphonate therapy may substantially slow bone loss, even when BMD does not immediately improve.

• Stabilisation rather than recovery of BMD may represent an appropriate treatment response while profound oestrogen deprivation persists.

• Multidisciplinary management and guideline-directed surveillance enabled this patient to remain fracture-free throughout treatment.

• Improvement in BMD after AI cessation highlights the central role of oestrogen in skeletal homeostasis.

Related

  1. Translational trends and specific nutritional interventions for aromatase inhibitor induced bone loss based on a 25 year multi database bibliometric and thematic evolution analysis from 2000 to 2025
    Zhenfan Huang, Yuyu Zhang, Qiongyu Wu +1
    Frontiers in NutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  2. Omega-3 fatty acids in aromatase inhibitor-associated dyslipidemia: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and future perspectives
    Ruiqi Chen, Minghao Xiong, Shengchao Huang
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefDOAJ
  3. Scoping review of biologic and imaging markers associated with aromatase inhibitor related musculoskeletal symptoms
    Stephanie Rosenberg, Tomas Escobar Gil, Jacklyn Nemunaitis
    Translational Breast Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  4. Societal and Healthcare Costs of Post-IDFS Events Following Adjuvant Ribociclib Plus an Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) Versus AI Alone in Pre- and Postmenopausal Women with Early HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer in Canada.
    Dina Soliman, Christine Brezden-Masley, Sandeep Sehdev +3
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Baseline SII and SIRI identify immune-inflammatory susceptibility and improve risk stratification of early subclinical cardiac dysfunction during non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy
    Cenyu Li, Zhengyu Tao, Yihan Wu +6
    Frontiers in cardiovascular medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{hameed2026p017,
  title = {{P017 Serial DXA Monitoring in Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Bone Loss: A Decade of Progressive Bone Loss, Stabilisation with Bisphosphonate Therapy and Recovery Following Endocrine Therapy Cessation}},
  author = {Bilal Hameed and Hafis Muhammed and Naveen Ravichandran and Syed Mustafa and Srinivasan Venkatachalam},
  journal = {Rheumatology advances in practice},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1093/rap/rkag113.047},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728726},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - P017 Serial DXA Monitoring in Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Bone Loss: A Decade of Progressive Bone Loss, Stabilisation with Bisphosphonate Therapy and Recovery Following Endocrine Therapy Cessation
AU  - Bilal Hameed
AU  - Hafis Muhammed
AU  - Naveen Ravichandran
AU  - Syed Mustafa
AU  - Srinivasan Venkatachalam
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
JO  - Rheumatology advances in practice
DO  - 10.1093/rap/rkag113.047
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728726
AB  - Introduction: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) substantially reduce breast cancer recurrence but accelerate bone loss through profound oestrogen deprivation. International guidelines recommend fracture risk assessment, serial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), optimisation of calcium and vitamin D, and anti-resorptive therapy when indicated. Despite these measures, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal management of patients who continue to lose bone mineral density (BMD) during AI therapy. We present a 10-year longitudinal case illustrating how serial DXA surveillance informed management, demonstrated the natural history of AI-induced bone loss, and reinforced the importance of multidisciplinary care throughout breast cancer survivorship.  Case description: A 55-year-old woman was diagnosed with Grade 3 ER-positive, PR-positive, HER2-negative invasive ductal breast carcinoma at 41 years of age. Treatment included neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FEC followed by Taxotere), breast-conserving surgery, bilateral oophorectomy, tamoxifen, and letrozole from April 2015 to June 2023.  At commencement of letrozole, her only recognised osteoporosis risk factors were low BMI (21 kg/m²) and profound oestrogen deprivation following bilateral oophorectomy. BMI subsequently improved to approximately 22 kg/m². She had no previous fragility fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, excess alcohol intake, recurrent falls, glucocorticoid exposure or family history of hip fracture. Secondary causes of osteoporosis were repeatedly excluded whenever further BMD decline was observed.  Baseline DXA demonstrated lumbar spine BMD 1.036 g/cm² (T-score −1.36) and femoral neck BMD 0.876 g/cm² (T-score −0.86). The first surveillance DXA, performed two years after initiating letrozole in accordance with AI-induced bone loss (AIBL) guidance, demonstrated a marked decline in lumbar spine BMD to 0.927 g/cm² (T-score −2.1), representing an annual loss of 4.3%, with femoral neck BMD declining to 0.828 g/cm² (T-score −1.3). In response to this significant deterioration, oral risedronate was commenced, while calcium and vitamin D supplementation were continued. The patient remained fully compliant with treatment throughout follow-up.  Subsequent serial DXA demonstrated marked slowing and stabilisation of bone loss, with lumbar spine BMD measuring 0.897 g/cm² (T-score −2.4) in 2019 and 0.882 g/cm² (T-score −2.5) in 2021, while femoral neck BMD remained largely stable (0.839 and 0.843 g/cm², respectively). Following discontinuation of letrozole in 2023, lumbar spine BMD improved to 0.918 g/cm² (T-score −2.4), with stable femoral neck BMD (0.845 g/cm²; T-score −1.4), despite no additional osteoporosis treatment. Importantly, she remained fracture-free throughout follow-up.  For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text  P017 Figure 1  Discussion: This case highlights the value of serial DXA surveillance in understanding the trajectory of aromatase inhibitor-induced bone loss (AIBL) and supporting clinical decision-making. The most striking finding was the rapid decline in lumbar spine BMD within the first two years of letrozole therapy, despite calcium and vitamin D supplementation. This prompted initiation of oral risedronate in accordance with current AIBL guidance.  Following commencement of risedronate, serial DXA demonstrated stabilisation of bone loss, with a marked reduction in the rate of lumbar spine decline and preservation of femoral BMD. The patient remained fully compliant with treatment, sustained no fragility fractures, and repeated assessment excluded secondary causes of osteoporosis. These findings suggest that anti-resorptive therapy effectively attenuated further skeletal deterioration during continued aromatase inhibitor exposure.  This case also highlights the challenge of interpreting serial DXA findings during prolonged endocrine therapy. Although lumbar spine BMD remained in the osteoporotic range, the absence of fractures, stable BMD trajectory following risedronate, low overall fracture risk and anticipated completion of endocrine therapy supported continuation of guideline-based management rather than escalation to more potent anti-resorptive or anabolic therapy. The subsequent improvement in lumbar spine BMD following discontinuation of letrozole reinforces the central role of persistent oestrogen deprivation in AI-induced bone loss and suggests that recovery may not occur until endocrine therapy has been completed.  Importantly, this case reinforces the value of multidisciplinary collaboration between oncology and metabolic bone services. Regular DXA surveillance enabled timely intervention, informed shared decision-making and prevented fragility fractures throughout treatment. It also provides a practical learning point for clinicians: during ongoing aromatase inhibitor therapy, stabilisation of BMD may represent an appropriate therapeutic response, while meaningful recovery may only be expected after cessation of endocrine therapy.  Key learning points: • Serial DXA monitoring provides valuable insight into the trajectory of AI-induced bone loss and informs treatment decisions.  • The greatest lumbar spine BMD decline may occur during the first two years of aromatase inhibitor therapy.  • Bisphosphonate therapy may substantially slow bone loss, even when BMD does not immediately improve.  • Stabilisation rather than recovery of BMD may represent an appropriate treatment response while profound oestrogen deprivation persists.  • Multidisciplinary management and guideline-directed surveillance enabled this patient to remain fracture-free throughout treatment.  • Improvement in BMD after AI cessation highlights the central role of oestrogen in skeletal homeostasis.
SN  - 2514-1775
ER  -