Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The Astrophysical Journal

The Star-forming Main Sequence and Bursty Star-formation Histories at z > 1.4 in JADES and AURORA

5 affiliations
  1. 1University of California
  2. 2University of Arizona
  3. 3Cosmic Dawn Center (DAWN)
  4. 4University of Copenhagen
  5. 5University of Kentucky

Abstract

We analyze JWST spectroscopic and Hubble Space Telescope+JWST photometric observations of 659 star-forming galaxies at 1.4 < z < 9 from DR3 of the JADES survey and the AURORA Cycle 1 program. We measure the star-forming main sequence (SFMS) for galaxies above 10 8.5 M ⊙ where the sample is largely representative, estimating star-formation rates (SFRs) using the H α line flux and rest-frame far UV (1600 Å) continuum measurements, each independently corrected for dust attenuation. We find that the intrinsic, measurement-error-subtracted scatter in the SFMS ( σ int ) increases with decreasing stellar mass for the H α -based SFMS, and we find no mass dependence of σ int in the UV-based SFMS. Additionally, we find that σ int decreases with increasing redshift, from 0.3 6 − 0.02 + 0.02 dex to 0.2 2 − 0.07 + 0.08 dex (H α SFMS), and from 0.2 8 − 0.02 + 0.02 dex to 0.2 0 − 0.07 + 0.08 dex (UV SFMS) between z ∼ 2 and z ∼ 6.5. We also measure the redshift evolution of the specific SFR and find that, assuming sSFR ∝ (1 + z) γ , γ = 1.8 9 − 0.15 + 0.16 for the H α -based SFMS, and γ = 1.3 6 − 0.13 + 0.13 for the UV-based SFMS. Analyzing the observed H α /UV luminosity ratios and star-formation histories from the prospector fitting code, we find that 41%–60% of the sample is inconsistent with having a constant star-formation history. Finally, we find tentative evidence for shorter SFR burst timescales with increasing redshift based on the distribution of L H α / ν L ν ,1600 versus Δ log ( L H α ) . Taken together, these results are consistent with recent theoretical predictions (e.g., the thesan-zoom simulations) of bursty star formation in the early Universe and provide valuable constraints for theoretical models of galaxy evolution.

Related

  1. Caught Napping by JWST UNCOVER+MegaScience: Constraining bursty star formation histories and number densities of mini-quenched galaxies at redshifts 4-7
    Gourav Khullar, Rachel Bezanson, Katherine A. Suess +27
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textGalaxiesInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  2. Mitigating the overcooling problem with sink-based bursty star formation in a high-z dwarf galaxy
    Cheonsu Kang, Taysun Kimm, Daniel Han +4
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  3. The AURORA Survey: Determining the Production Mechanism for OI λ8449 Emission in Star-forming Galaxies at Cosmic Noon
    Leonardo Clarke, Alice E. Shapley, Zhiwei Shao +11
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
  4. The Pandora project. II: how non-thermal physics drives bursty star formation and temperate mass-loaded outflows in dwarf galaxies
    Sergio Martin-Alvarez, Debora Sijacki, Martin G Haehnelt +11
    Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.Peer-reviewedHAL deposit licenceFull text9 citedGalaxiesHAL
  5. How bursty star formation shapes spectral diversity at high redshifts: breaking degeneracies in early galaxy formation
    Viola Gelli, Charlotte A. Mason, Daniel P. Stark +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
BibTeX
@article{clarke2026starforming,
  title = {{The Star-forming Main Sequence and Bursty Star-formation Histories at z > 1.4 in JADES and AURORA}},
  author = {Leonardo Clarke and Alice E. Shapley and Natalie Lam and Michael W. Topping and Gabriel B. Brammer and Ryan L. Sanders and Naveen A. Reddy and Shreya Karthikeyan},
  journal = {The Astrophysical Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ae9fec},
  url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ae9fec},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Star-forming Main Sequence and Bursty Star-formation Histories at z > 1.4 in JADES and AURORA
AU  - Leonardo Clarke
AU  - Alice E. Shapley
AU  - Natalie Lam
AU  - Michael W. Topping
AU  - Gabriel B. Brammer
AU  - Ryan L. Sanders
AU  - Naveen A. Reddy
AU  - Shreya Karthikeyan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - The Astrophysical Journal
DO  - 10.3847/1538-4357/ae9fec
UR  - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ae9fec
AB  - We analyze JWST spectroscopic and Hubble Space Telescope+JWST photometric observations of 659 star-forming galaxies at 1.4 < z < 9 from DR3 of the JADES survey and the AURORA Cycle 1 program. We measure the star-forming main sequence (SFMS) for galaxies above 10 8.5 M ⊙ where the sample is largely representative, estimating star-formation rates (SFRs) using the H α line flux and rest-frame far UV (1600 Å) continuum measurements, each independently corrected for dust attenuation. We find that the intrinsic, measurement-error-subtracted scatter in the SFMS ( σ int ) increases with decreasing stellar mass for the H α -based SFMS, and we find no mass dependence of σ int in the UV-based SFMS. Additionally, we find that σ int decreases with increasing redshift, from 0.3 6 − 0.02 + 0.02 dex to 0.2 2 − 0.07 + 0.08 dex (H α SFMS), and from 0.2 8 − 0.02 + 0.02 dex to 0.2 0 − 0.07 + 0.08 dex (UV SFMS) between z ∼ 2 and z ∼ 6.5. We also measure the redshift evolution of the specific SFR and find that, assuming sSFR ∝ (1 + z) γ , γ = 1.8 9 − 0.15 + 0.16 for the H α -based SFMS, and γ = 1.3 6 − 0.13 + 0.13 for the UV-based SFMS. Analyzing the observed H α /UV luminosity ratios and star-formation histories from the prospector fitting code, we find that 41%–60% of the sample is inconsistent with having a constant star-formation history. Finally, we find tentative evidence for shorter SFR burst timescales with increasing redshift based on the distribution of L H α / ν L ν ,1600 versus Δ log ( L H α ) . Taken together, these results are consistent with recent theoretical predictions (e.g., the thesan-zoom simulations) of bursty star formation in the early Universe and provide valuable constraints for theoretical models of galaxy evolution.
SN  - 0004-637X
SN  - 1538-4357
ER  -