Disentangling shape and size variation to compare canopy architecture in maize
- 1INRAE
Abstract
{middle dot} Comparing maize canopies is confounded by two problems: plants differ in the number of phytomers they produce, and phytomer size scales with that number. Position along the shoot is therefore an unreliable basis for comparison, confounding shape with size. {middle dot} We first position the floral transition (tassel initiation, T.I.) within shoot development, revealing it as the landmark that organizes a conserved canopy shape. This provides the foundation for aligning canopies that differ in phytomer number. {middle dot} Focusing on the leaf blade, we used functional data analysis on a maize panel across controlled and field environments to decompose variation in blade-length profiles, which was dominated (77%) by overall amplitude, identifying scaling as the major source of size variation. Because blades enlarge with each phytomer until the transition, later T.I. yields a larger maximum; this T.I.-linked component explains up to one-third of scaling variation, reinforced by a shared genetic association between T.I. and blade size with the flowering-time gene ZmCCT10. {middle dot} Regressing out this component leaves a residual that defines a new, heritable axis of intrinsic scaling, independent of flowering time. It distinguishes hyper- and hypo-scaling genotypes consistently across environments, offering a selection target decoupled from phenology.
Related
- Habitat integrity and canopy cover shape small-scale variation in coloration among odonate assemblages in Neotropical streams
- Genome-wide cross-trait analysis to compare genetic architecture between Parkinson's disease and kidney-related traits.
- Less diverse but uniquely composed: Canopy cover and elevation shape Neotropical Arcellinida assemblages in the Peruvian Andes
- Interacting effects of canopy geometry and display activity timing shape conditions for visual signalling in Victoria’s riflebird
- Competition and habitat filtering shape Neotropical canopy butterfly communities across a rainfall seasonality gradient
BibTeX
@misc{johnson2026disentangling,
title = {{Disentangling shape and size variation to compare canopy architecture in maize}},
author = {K. Johnson and C. Fournier and C. Palaffre and R. J. Wisser},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.17.752132},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.752132v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Disentangling shape and size variation to compare canopy architecture in maize
AU - K. Johnson
AU - C. Fournier
AU - C. Palaffre
AU - R. J. Wisser
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/17
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.17.752132
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.752132v1
AB - {middle dot} Comparing maize canopies is confounded by two problems: plants differ in the number of phytomers they produce, and phytomer size scales with that number. Position along the shoot is therefore an unreliable basis for comparison, confounding shape with size. {middle dot} We first position the floral transition (tassel initiation, T.I.) within shoot development, revealing it as the landmark that organizes a conserved canopy shape. This provides the foundation for aligning canopies that differ in phytomer number. {middle dot} Focusing on the leaf blade, we used functional data analysis on a maize panel across controlled and field environments to decompose variation in blade-length profiles, which was dominated (77%) by overall amplitude, identifying scaling as the major source of size variation. Because blades enlarge with each phytomer until the transition, later T.I. yields a larger maximum; this T.I.-linked component explains up to one-third of scaling variation, reinforced by a shared genetic association between T.I. and blade size with the flowering-time gene ZmCCT10. {middle dot} Regressing out this component leaves a residual that defines a new, heritable axis of intrinsic scaling, independent of flowering time. It distinguishes hyper- and hypo-scaling genotypes consistently across environments, offering a selection target decoupled from phenology.
ER -