Finite-horizon maintenance under geometric-process models: Quantifying model and decision uncertainty
Abstract
Geometric process (GP) models are widely used for repairable systems whose inter-failure times evolve over successive failure-repair cycles. Maintenance decisions under GP models are often made with limited failure data and are subject to uncertainty in baseline selection and the resulting maintenance decision. Existing approaches typically rely on model ranking and plug-in estimates, which can understate uncertainty surrounding next-cycle replacement decisions. This paper develops a unified generalized-inference framework for finite-horizon, event-driven maintenance decision making under GP models. The proposed framework quantifies uncertainty in GP model parameters, cycle-specific reliability, hazard rate, one-cycle cost rate, and the associated optimal replacement time. For exponential and gamma baselines, the framework yields generalized confidence intervals through generalized pivotal quantities. For the Weibull baseline, it is implemented through a generalized fiducial approach. It also extends to a finite-sample discrimination procedure for quantifying baseline-selection uncertainty. Theoretical results establish the asymptotic validity of the proposed procedures and their interval estimates. Simulation study shows reliable finite-sample coverage for model parameters and nonlinear maintenance-relevant quantities, and satisfactory discrimination performance. A case study on aircraft air-conditioning failures shows that, in early cycles, replacement schedules with similar expected cost can imply materially different risk profiles, so a single plug-in recommendation may be misleading.
Related
- Stochastic dynamic programming for condition-based maintenance and production considering predetermined demand and maintenance delay in a finite planning horizon
- Receding Horizon Control and Dissipativity - Optimal Control, Games and Uncertainty
- A Three-Way Testing Framework for Quantifying Epistemic Calibration Uncertainty in SBI
- On Exact Dual and Mixed-Integer Reformulations for Finite Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Submodular Revenue Maximization
- Transformation of Adaptive Multistage Sampling for Solving Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Unknown Model
BibTeX
@misc{wu2026finitehorizon,
title = {{Finite-horizon maintenance under geometric-process models: Quantifying model and decision uncertainty}},
author = {Wenhui Wu and Bingxing Wang and Wei Wang and Piao Chen},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.32108},
eprint = {2610.32108},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32108},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Finite-horizon maintenance under geometric-process models: Quantifying model and decision uncertainty
AU - Wenhui Wu
AU - Bingxing Wang
AU - Wei Wang
AU - Piao Chen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.32108
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32108
AB - Geometric process (GP) models are widely used for repairable systems whose inter-failure times evolve over successive failure-repair cycles. Maintenance decisions under GP models are often made with limited failure data and are subject to uncertainty in baseline selection and the resulting maintenance decision. Existing approaches typically rely on model ranking and plug-in estimates, which can understate uncertainty surrounding next-cycle replacement decisions. This paper develops a unified generalized-inference framework for finite-horizon, event-driven maintenance decision making under GP models. The proposed framework quantifies uncertainty in GP model parameters, cycle-specific reliability, hazard rate, one-cycle cost rate, and the associated optimal replacement time. For exponential and gamma baselines, the framework yields generalized confidence intervals through generalized pivotal quantities. For the Weibull baseline, it is implemented through a generalized fiducial approach. It also extends to a finite-sample discrimination procedure for quantifying baseline-selection uncertainty. Theoretical results establish the asymptotic validity of the proposed procedures and their interval estimates. Simulation study shows reliable finite-sample coverage for model parameters and nonlinear maintenance-relevant quantities, and satisfactory discrimination performance. A case study on aircraft air-conditioning failures shows that, in early cycles, replacement schedules with similar expected cost can imply materially different risk profiles, so a single plug-in recommendation may be misleading.
ER -