Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Quantum Inversion of Units in Group Rings: Block Dimension, Not Commutativity, Governs Hardness

Abstract

Several public-key schemes base their security on the belief that inverting a unit of a group ring is hard. A recent result showed that this belief is false on a quantum computer when the group is abelian. To restore security, designers moved to non-abelian groups, especially dihedral groups, believing that the hardness of the dihedral hidden subgroup problem (HSP) would protect the scheme. This paper shows that unit inversion is a different problem and does not require an HSP solver. Instead, it can be solved by a change of basis that splits the group ring into small matrix blocks. We prove that unit inversion is polynomial-time, classically and quantumly, when an efficient generalized Fourier transform exists, the group ring is semisimple, and the largest matrix block has polynomial size. Dihedral group rings satisfy these conditions because their irreducible representations have dimension at most 2 and an efficient Fourier transform exists. We give an explicit reversible quantum circuit for the block-inversion step and validate it in a register-level simulator. We also identify the exact structural boundary where the method stops and propose a candidate construction in the surviving regime under a new, clearly stated security assumption. The constructive results are supported by reproducible software artifacts and experiments.

Related

  1. The Quantum Overlap Gap Property and Algorithmic Hardness for the Quantum Hypergraph Max-Cut Problem
    Mikhail Mints, Eric R. Anschuetz
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. On Certifying Source Sampling Hardness in Quantum Generative Modeling
    Chen-Yu Liu, Leonardo Placidi, Enrico Rinaldi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Hardness of Approximating Quantum Code Distance Beyond √N
    Upendra Kapshikar
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Structured Quantum Hardness from Unstructured Assumptions
    Xiao Liang, Takashi Yamakawa, Chak Fai Yung
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Encoding universal quantum computation into quantized Berry phases: Hardness results and classical algorithms
    Kazuki Sakamoto, Keisuke Fujii
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{gupta2026quantum,
  title = {{Quantum Inversion of Units in Group Rings: Block Dimension, Not Commutativity, Governs Hardness}},
  author = {Bhanwar Gupta},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.10596},
  eprint = {2609.10596},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10596},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantum Inversion of Units in Group Rings: Block Dimension, Not Commutativity, Governs Hardness
AU  - Bhanwar Gupta
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/07
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.10596
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10596
AB  - Several public-key schemes base their security on the belief that inverting a unit of a group ring is hard. A recent result showed that this belief is false on a quantum computer when the group is abelian. To restore security, designers moved to non-abelian groups, especially dihedral groups, believing that the hardness of the dihedral hidden subgroup problem (HSP) would protect the scheme. This paper shows that unit inversion is a different problem and does not require an HSP solver. Instead, it can be solved by a change of basis that splits the group ring into small matrix blocks. We prove that unit inversion is polynomial-time, classically and quantumly, when an efficient generalized Fourier transform exists, the group ring is semisimple, and the largest matrix block has polynomial size. Dihedral group rings satisfy these conditions because their irreducible representations have dimension at most 2 and an efficient Fourier transform exists. We give an explicit reversible quantum circuit for the block-inversion step and validate it in a register-level simulator. We also identify the exact structural boundary where the method stops and propose a candidate construction in the surviving regime under a new, clearly stated security assumption. The constructive results are supported by reproducible software artifacts and experiments.
ER  -