Knowledge, attitudes and practices on sex and gender in Swiss research ethics committees
Abstract
Background: Scientific evidence remains gender-biased despite the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines publication. Overlooking sex and gender raises ethical concerns, which led to SAGER-swissethics recommendations for Research Ethics Committees (REC). Their implementation likely depends on the knowledge and attitudes of REC members. This study assesses REC members’ knowledge, attitudes and practices.
Methods: We conducted the first wave of a repeated online survey among 240 members from seven Swiss RECs (March 2026, follow-up planned at 1 year). Knowledge (score min-max 0-17), attitudes (0-205) and practices (0-14) were assessed. Outcomes are reported as medians and interquartile ranges, and compared by gender using Mann-Whitney tests.
Preliminary results: Among 75 participants, 35 identified as women (w) (47%) and 5 did not report their gender (7%). Overall (o), respondents showed substantial knowledge (o: 13, 11-14; w: 13.5, 12-14; men (m): 12.5, 10-14) and positive attitudes (o: 159, 146-175; w: 164, 156-179; m: 155, 141-170), but low levels of practices (o: 6, 4-8; w: 6, 4-8; m: 6, 6-8). While 55% had read the SAGER-swissethics recommendations, only 22% reported implementing them. Attitude scores were significantly higher in women (p = 0.008), with no evidence of gender differences in knowledge or practices.
Conclusions: Swiss REC members demonstrate good knowledge and positive attitudes towards sex and gender in research, with women expressing more positive attitudes than men. However, the low level of reported practices highlights a gap between awareness and implementation. Targeted interventions and identification of facilitators and barriers are needed to support the integration of sex and gender into ethical review processes.
Key messages: • Gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and practices emphasize the need for more targeted interventions.
• In particular, shortcomings in practices highlight the need to strengthen the uptake of existing guidelines.
Related
- A mixed-methods study of knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to gluten-free diets in india
- Healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding perioperative ischemic stroke in elderly patients
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self‐Care Practices for the Prevention of Puerperal Sepsis and Factors of Self‐Care Practices in Peri‐Urban Areas of Dessie, Ethiopia: A Cross‐Sectional Study
- Parental knowledge, attitudes, and discretionary practices regarding children’s dietary salt intake in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study
- Factor structure and psychometric validation of the antenatal exercise knowledge, attitudes, and practices questionnaire : A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from Saudi Arabian pregnant women
BibTeX
@article{matti2026knowledge,
title = {{Knowledge, attitudes and practices on sex and gender in Swiss research ethics committees}},
author = {C Matti and J Schwarz and C Samer and A Gayet-Ageron},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.890},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.890},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Knowledge, attitudes and practices on sex and gender in Swiss research ethics committees
AU - C Matti
AU - J Schwarz
AU - C Samer
AU - A Gayet-Ageron
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.890
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.890
AB - Background: Scientific evidence remains gender-biased despite the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines publication. Overlooking sex and gender raises ethical concerns, which led to SAGER-swissethics recommendations for Research Ethics Committees (REC). Their implementation likely depends on the knowledge and attitudes of REC members. This study assesses REC members’ knowledge, attitudes and practices. Methods: We conducted the first wave of a repeated online survey among 240 members from seven Swiss RECs (March 2026, follow-up planned at 1 year). Knowledge (score min-max 0-17), attitudes (0-205) and practices (0-14) were assessed. Outcomes are reported as medians and interquartile ranges, and compared by gender using Mann-Whitney tests. Preliminary results: Among 75 participants, 35 identified as women (w) (47%) and 5 did not report their gender (7%). Overall (o), respondents showed substantial knowledge (o: 13, 11-14; w: 13.5, 12-14; men (m): 12.5, 10-14) and positive attitudes (o: 159, 146-175; w: 164, 156-179; m: 155, 141-170), but low levels of practices (o: 6, 4-8; w: 6, 4-8; m: 6, 6-8). While 55% had read the SAGER-swissethics recommendations, only 22% reported implementing them. Attitude scores were significantly higher in women (p = 0.008), with no evidence of gender differences in knowledge or practices. Conclusions: Swiss REC members demonstrate good knowledge and positive attitudes towards sex and gender in research, with women expressing more positive attitudes than men. However, the low level of reported practices highlights a gap between awareness and implementation. Targeted interventions and identification of facilitators and barriers are needed to support the integration of sex and gender into ethical review processes. Key messages: • Gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and practices emphasize the need for more targeted interventions. • In particular, shortcomings in practices highlight the need to strengthen the uptake of existing guidelines.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -