Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

When are bosonic Gaussian states classical to learn?

Abstract

A fundamental question in physics is: When does classical behavior emerge from quantum systems? Bosonic Gaussian states provide a natural setting to explore this quantum-classical boundary, as they capture both the classical field behavior and the intrinsic quantum nature of light. Here, we address this problem from a learning-theoretic perspective by asking: When are bosonic Gaussian states classical to learn? That is, under what conditions (if any) can an n-mode bosonic Gaussian state be learned with as few samples, and with operations as simple, as are needed to learn a classical 2n-variate Gaussian distribution? We establish a smooth crossover in learnability governed by the state's thermal fluctuations: - Cold Gaussian states are non-classical to learn: When the covariance matrix satisfies Σ≤(1/2+O(1/n))I, i.e. close to the vacuum covariance, tomography under single-copy (i.e., non-entangled) measurements fundamentally requires Ω(n3) copies, strictly exceeding the sample complexity Θ(n2) of learning classical Gaussian distributions. We show that this hardness persists even when few-copy entangled measurements are allowed. - Warm Gaussian states are classical to learn: When thermal fluctuations exceed the vacuum noise, parameterized by Σ≥(1/2+ν)I for any parameter ν>0, we prove that single-copy tomography requires N=Θ(n2min(n,1+ν−1)) copies. This bound is tight and is achieved by simple, non-adaptive, unentangled heterodyne measurements. Crucially, for ν=Ω(1), the sample complexity drops to Θ(n2), matching the classical case. Our results tightly characterize a quantum-to-classical crossover in the learnability of bosonic Gaussian states, reveal a novel connection between fundamental physics and statistical learning theory, and have implications for real-world sensing experiments.

Related

  1. Dynamical classical-field limit of Bosonic Gibbs states: Renormalized Hartree NLS correlations in 2D and 3D
    Phan Thành Nam, Rongchan Zhu, Xiangchan Zhu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsMathematical physicsarXiv
  2. Classical Capacity of Single-Mode Bosonic Gaussian Channels
    Gerardo Adesso, Ludovico Lami, Vittorio Giovannetti
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Entangled measurements are necessary for optimal tomography of mixed fermionic Gaussian states and of bosonic Gaussian states near the vacuum
    Ron Rubin
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Finding Gaussian Structure in Bosonic States
    Alvan Arulandu, Sitan Chen, Ziyun Chen +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Is √d Separation Necessary for Gradient EM to Learn Gaussian Mixtures in High Dimensions?
    Yiran Zhang, Mo Zhou, Weihang Xu +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026when,
  title = {{When are bosonic Gaussian states classical to learn?}},
  author = {Senrui Chen and Antonio Anna Mele and Francesco Anna Mele and John Preskill},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.26705},
  eprint = {2609.26705},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26705},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - When are bosonic Gaussian states classical to learn?
AU  - Senrui Chen
AU  - Antonio Anna Mele
AU  - Francesco Anna Mele
AU  - John Preskill
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/22
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.26705
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26705
AB  - A fundamental question in physics is: When does classical behavior emerge from quantum systems? Bosonic Gaussian states provide a natural setting to explore this quantum-classical boundary, as they capture both the classical field behavior and the intrinsic quantum nature of light. Here, we address this problem from a learning-theoretic perspective by asking: When are bosonic Gaussian states classical to learn? That is, under what conditions (if any) can an n-mode bosonic Gaussian state be learned with as few samples, and with operations as simple, as are needed to learn a classical 2n-variate Gaussian distribution? We establish a smooth crossover in learnability governed by the state's thermal fluctuations: - Cold Gaussian states are non-classical to learn: When the covariance matrix satisfies Σ≤(1/2+O(1/n))I, i.e. close to the vacuum covariance, tomography under single-copy (i.e., non-entangled) measurements fundamentally requires Ω(n^3) copies, strictly exceeding the sample complexity Θ(n^2) of learning classical Gaussian distributions. We show that this hardness persists even when few-copy entangled measurements are allowed. - Warm Gaussian states are classical to learn: When thermal fluctuations exceed the vacuum noise, parameterized by Σ≥(1/2+ν)I for any parameter ν>0, we prove that single-copy tomography requires N=Θ(n^2min(n,1+ν^−1)) copies. This bound is tight and is achieved by simple, non-adaptive, unentangled heterodyne measurements. Crucially, for ν=Ω(1), the sample complexity drops to Θ(n^2), matching the classical case. Our results tightly characterize a quantum-to-classical crossover in the learnability of bosonic Gaussian states, reveal a novel connection between fundamental physics and statistical learning theory, and have implications for real-world sensing experiments.
ER  -