Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Cones of Theta Graphs are Enumeratively Chromatic-Choosable

Abstract

Chromatic choosability is a fundamental notion in list coloring. A graph G is chromatic-choosable if its chromatic number χ(G) equals its list chromatic number χℓ(G). In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of a graph G, denoted by Pℓ(G,m), which is the list-coloring analogue of its chromatic polynomial P(G,m). A graph G is enumeratively chromatic-choosable if Pℓ(G,m)=P(G,m) for every m ∈ ℕ. In 2002, Ohba proved that for every graph G, there exists an N ∈ ℕ such that Kp ∨ G is chromatic-choosable whenever p ≥ N. Allred and Mudrock recently conjectured that an analogous statement holds for enumerative chromatic choosability. In this paper, we prove that K1 ∨ G is enumeratively chromatic-choosable whenever G is a theta graph. Our proof combines classical inequalities, the polynomial method, and ideas from DP (or correspondence) coloring.

Related

  1. Elementary graphs are chromatic-choosable
    Narayanan N, Nandana K. Vasudevan, K. Somasundaram
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Claw-free perfect graphs are chromatic-choosable
    Suchismita Mishra, Narayanan Narayanan, Umesh Shankar
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. On the k-Distance Chromatic Number of Unicyclic Graphs
    Rosário Fernandes, Rúben Palma
    Discrete Mathematics LettersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  4. Minimal Cayley graphs with large chromatic number
    James Davies, Meike Hatzel, Liana Yepremyan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. Geometric triangle-free graphs of large chromatic number
    István Tomon
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{barnes2026cones,
  title = {{Cones of Theta Graphs are Enumeratively Chromatic-Choosable}},
  author = {Kingston Barnes and Vincent Fesenmeier and Braxton Gaither and Michael Guthrie and Leonardo Marciaga and Lucas Miller and Fennec Morrissette and Jeffrey A. Mudrock and Gavin Nguyen and Rose Zellner},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.15132},
  eprint = {2610.15132},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15132},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cones of Theta Graphs are Enumeratively Chromatic-Choosable
AU  - Kingston Barnes
AU  - Vincent Fesenmeier
AU  - Braxton Gaither
AU  - Michael Guthrie
AU  - Leonardo Marciaga
AU  - Lucas Miller
AU  - Fennec Morrissette
AU  - Jeffrey A. Mudrock
AU  - Gavin Nguyen
AU  - Rose Zellner
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/10
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.15132
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15132
AB  - Chromatic choosability is a fundamental notion in list coloring. A graph G is chromatic-choosable if its chromatic number χ(G) equals its list chromatic number χ_ℓ(G). In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of a graph G, denoted by P_ℓ(G,m), which is the list-coloring analogue of its chromatic polynomial P(G,m). A graph G is enumeratively chromatic-choosable if P_ℓ(G,m)=P(G,m) for every m ∈ ℕ. In 2002, Ohba proved that for every graph G, there exists an N ∈ ℕ such that K_p ∨ G is chromatic-choosable whenever p ≥ N. Allred and Mudrock recently conjectured that an analogous statement holds for enumerative chromatic choosability. In this paper, we prove that K_1 ∨ G is enumeratively chromatic-choosable whenever G is a theta graph. Our proof combines classical inequalities, the polynomial method, and ideas from DP (or correspondence) coloring.
ER  -