Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

A Structural–Developmental Theory of Physical Literacy: Motor Literacy, Movement Literacy, and Meta-Motor Regulation

  1. 1Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Physical literacy has become central to kinesiology, yet its frameworks rarely distinguish the latent resources that make movement possible from the movement that can be observed, and assessment therefore tends to equate physical literacy with what fitness and skill tests capture. This article proposes a structural–developmental theory in which physical literacy emerges from two coupled subsystems. Motor literacy, the latent side, is organized from capacity to capability to ability across six domains. Movement literacy, the observable side, develops from action to pattern to skill across six lifespan stages. Meta-Motor Regulation, a predictive and adaptive process operating over three timescales, links the two. Illustrative cases from university teaching, coaching and ageing show how the subsystems can develop out of alignment. The theory yields five testable predictions and a dual-profile approach to assessment, teaching and kinesiology education.

Related

  1. Sensory Regulation, Theraplay®, Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing, and Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy Integration (STEDi) for Adoptive Children who have Experienced Developmental Trauma and Attachment Disruptions: A Mixed-Methods Preliminary Evaluation
    Jack Purrington, Caitlin Manning, Georgia York
    Journal of Child & Adolescent TraumaPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  2. More than movement: a conceptual exploration of the convergence of social-emotional learning and physical literacy
    Kyle Pushkarenko, Liz Durden-Myers
    Frontiers in sports and active livingPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  3. Collective movement: reimagining children's physical literacy through shared responsibility
    N. E. Houser, M. L. Humbert, L. J. Ferguson +3
    Frontiers in sports and active livingPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMCPMC
  4. The Choreography of Coupled Brains: Coordinated Movement and Multi-Scale Neural Synchrony in Musical Theater for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities
    Z. Moore, N. Tasnim, R. Frank +8
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Assessing Oral Health Literacy in Children and Adolescents: Current Evidence, Measurement Gaps, and Developmental Considerations
    Cansu Özşin Özler, Bahar Güçiz Doğan
    Children (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{tahmasbi2026structuraldevelopmental,
  title = {{A Structural–Developmental Theory of Physical Literacy: Motor Literacy, Movement Literacy, and Meta-Motor Regulation}},
  author = {Farshid Tahmasbi},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23595410},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23595410},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Structural–Developmental Theory of Physical Literacy: Motor Literacy, Movement Literacy, and Meta-Motor Regulation
AU  - Farshid Tahmasbi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23595410
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23595410
AB  - Physical literacy has become central to kinesiology, yet its frameworks rarely distinguish the latent resources that make movement possible from the movement that can be observed, and assessment therefore tends to equate physical literacy with what fitness and skill tests capture. This article proposes a structural–developmental theory in which physical literacy emerges from two coupled subsystems. Motor literacy, the latent side, is organized from capacity to capability to ability across six domains. Movement literacy, the observable side, develops from action to pattern to skill across six lifespan stages. Meta-Motor Regulation, a predictive and adaptive process operating over three timescales, links the two. Illustrative cases from university teaching, coaching and ageing show how the subsystems can develop out of alignment. The theory yields five testable predictions and a dual-profile approach to assessment, teaching and kinesiology education.
ER  -