Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,549 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The role of density in phase transitions and new perspectives on theta functions

Abstract

Let z∈ ℍ:={z∈ℂ:ℑ(z)>0} and Λ:=1/√(ℑ(z))(ℤ⊕ zℤ), and set $ θ(α;z):=θ(α;Λ)=\sum_{(m,n)\in\mathbb{Z}^2}e^{-πα\frac{|m+nz|^2}{\Im(z)}}. $ We study the minimization of the functional $θ(α;z)-bθ(2α;z)$ and establish a complete phase diagram for all α>0 and b∈(0,√2). For 0<b<√2, an explicit threshold b1=0.0767767081⋯∈(0,1/10) separates two distinct types of phase transitions. Type I: 0<b<b1: it admits a type of ``hexagonal--rhombic--square--rectangular'' phase transition. Type II: b1≤ b<√2: it admits a type of ``hexagonal--square--rectangular'' phase transition, without passing through the rhombic lattices. These phase transitions contrast with Montgomery's theorem \cite{Mon1988}, where the hexagonal lattice minimizes the single theta function at all scales, and the recent Bétermin-Faulhuber-Steinerberger theorem \cite{BFS2026} for translated Gaussian lattice sums, where the hexagonal lattice prevails in a min-max structure. In our setting, the density parameter α governs the sequence of optimal lattice shapes, while the competition parameter b controls the emergence of the rhombic phase, which exists for b<b1 and vanishes for b≥ b1. As an application, we resolve Bétermin's conjecture \cite{Betermin2021AHP}. Bétermin predicted a Type I phase transition for the functional $θ(α;z)-(1/10)θ(2α;z)$ with b=1/10. We instead rigorously establish that no rhombic lattice is a global minimizer at any density and prove that the system undergoes a Type II phase transition, thereby settling the conjecture in corrected form.

Related

  1. Congruences modulo powers of 5 and 7 for the crank and rank parity functions and related mock theta-functions
    Dandan Chen, Rong Chen, Frank G. Garvan
    The Ramanujan JournalPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text5 citedAlgebra & number theoryOpenAlex
  2. Theta functions after Weil
    Benjamin Howard
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. Derivatives of Theta Functions and a Problem of Lyubarskii and Nes
    Lukas Liehr, Irina Shafkulovska, Mitchell A. Taylor
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. Bicolored Eulerian quasisymmetric functions, affine lengths, and Theta operators
    Hsin-Chieh Liao, Hai Zhu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. On the occurrence of congruence multiplicities between Ramanujan's theta functions
    Shane Chern, Nicolas Allen Smoot, Dazhao Tang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{deng2026role,
  title = {{The role of density in phase transitions and new perspectives on theta functions}},
  author = {Kaixin Deng and Senping Luo},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.35437},
  eprint = {2610.35437},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35437},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The role of density in phase transitions and new perspectives on theta functions
AU  - Kaixin Deng
AU  - Senping Luo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.35437
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35437
AB  - Let z∈ ℍ:={z∈ℂ:ℑ(z)>0} and Λ:=1/√(ℑ(z))(ℤ⊕ zℤ), and set $ θ(α;z):=θ(α;Λ)=\sum_{(m,n)\in\mathbb{Z}^2}e^{-πα\frac{|m+nz|^2}{\Im(z)}}. $ We study the minimization of the functional $θ(α;z)-bθ(2α;z)$ and establish a complete phase diagram for all α>0 and b∈(0,√2). For 0<b<√2, an explicit threshold b_1=0.0767767081⋯∈(0,1/10) separates two distinct types of phase transitions. Type I: 0<b<b_1: it admits a type of ``hexagonal--rhombic--square--rectangular'' phase transition. Type II: b_1≤ b<√2: it admits a type of ``hexagonal--square--rectangular'' phase transition, without passing through the rhombic lattices. These phase transitions contrast with Montgomery's theorem \cite{Mon1988}, where the hexagonal lattice minimizes the single theta function at all scales, and the recent Bétermin-Faulhuber-Steinerberger theorem \cite{BFS2026} for translated Gaussian lattice sums, where the hexagonal lattice prevails in a min-max structure. In our setting, the density parameter α governs the sequence of optimal lattice shapes, while the competition parameter b controls the emergence of the rhombic phase, which exists for b<b_1 and vanishes for b≥ b_1. As an application, we resolve Bétermin's conjecture \cite{Betermin2021AHP}. Bétermin predicted a Type I phase transition for the functional $θ(α;z)-(1/10)θ(2α;z)$ with b=1/10. We instead rigorously establish that no rhombic lattice is a global minimizer at any density and prove that the system undergoes a Type II phase transition, thereby settling the conjecture in corrected form.
ER  -