Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Health Services

From therapeutic pathways to patient archetypes: a latent class analysis framework for Value-Based Healthcare benchmarking

4 affiliations
  1. 1Group of Environmental Epidemiology and Child Development, Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute, Donostia/San Sebastian, Spain
  2. 2Biosistemak Institute for Health System Research, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain
  3. 3Red de Investigacion en Cronicidad, Atencion Primaria y Promocion de la Salud RICAPPS-(RICORS), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
  4. 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain

Abstract

Background: Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) focuses on Patient-Centred Outcomes (PCOs) to maximize healthcare value. Benchmarking across providers requires comparing outcomes among clinically and therapeutically comparable patients. However, traditional classification is based on biological features without accounting for the therapeutic trajectory. Establishing patient archetypes based on therapeutic pathways is therefore essential to prevent case-mix bias in VBHC benchmarking. The aim of this paper is to develop a model-based framework using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to (i) identify patient archetypes in breast cancer and (ii) establish a probabilistic tool to classify new patients.

Methods: A cohort of 2485 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2018 and 2020 was followed-up. Demographic and treatment variables were collected at baseline and at 6-months follow-up. LCA was applied to derive archetypes in a training set (80%). Fit and classification quality were assessed using aBIC, entropy, and posterior probabilities. Tool classification robustness was evaluated using Random Forest (RF) in a test set (20%), and generalizability was tested in an external multicenter cohort (N = 352).

Results: A six-class solution (Arch-1—Arch-6) was selected, achieving optimal fit, parsimony, high entropy (0.932), and clinical interpretability. Evaluated against RF, the tool demonstrated high classification concordance (99.68% accuracy). In the external cohort, high individual classification certainty was maintained (mean posterior probability = 0.965), supporting consistent assignment across care settings.

Conclusions: LCA provides a transparent, efficient and robust tool to identify patient archetypes and assign new patients based on therapeutic pathways, enabling fair benchmarking in VBHC. Prospective validation in broader cohorts is recommended to confirm transferability to other clinical conditions.

Related

  1. Factors associated with the quality of urban geriatric healthcare services empowered by large language models and improvement pathways: a theoretical framework and cross-sectional study
    Xiaoyan Qi, Xuejiao Song, Jingkai Xu +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Behavioral pathways to hospitalization: physical exercise, social participation, and healthcare utilization in China
    Xiaoran Hu, Guanglong Cui, Jiaye Zhang +2
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Learning from Nigeria’s public-private pathways to generate inclusive healthcare data
    Yash Raj Shrestha, Zeynep Erden, Öykü Isik +6
    Communications MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Unifying Vision and Language: Benchmarking End to End Transformer Model Against the ClipCap Framework
    S. Anand, D. M S, A. Dekker +1
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMedical imaging & radiologymedRxiv
  5. High-Resolution Mapping of Healthcare Pathways in Autism
    Like Huang, Tai Ren, Can Hou +8
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxivPMC
BibTeX
@article{otamendi2026from,
  title = {{From therapeutic pathways to patient archetypes: a latent class analysis framework for Value-Based Healthcare benchmarking}},
  author = {Maialen Otamendi and Itxaso Alayo and Ania Gorostiza and Jon Cacicedo and Ane Fullaondo and Borja García-Lorenzo},
  journal = {Frontiers in Health Services},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/frhs.2026.1789729},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1789729},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - From therapeutic pathways to patient archetypes: a latent class analysis framework for Value-Based Healthcare benchmarking
AU  - Maialen Otamendi
AU  - Itxaso Alayo
AU  - Ania Gorostiza
AU  - Jon Cacicedo
AU  - Ane Fullaondo
AU  - Borja García-Lorenzo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Frontiers in Health Services
DO  - 10.3389/frhs.2026.1789729
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1789729
AB  - Background: Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) focuses on Patient-Centred Outcomes (PCOs) to maximize healthcare value. Benchmarking across providers requires comparing outcomes among clinically and therapeutically comparable patients. However, traditional classification is based on biological features without accounting for the therapeutic trajectory. Establishing patient archetypes based on therapeutic pathways is therefore essential to prevent case-mix bias in VBHC benchmarking. The aim of this paper is to develop a model-based framework using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to (i) identify patient archetypes in breast cancer and (ii) establish a probabilistic tool to classify new patients.  Methods: A cohort of 2485 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2018 and 2020 was followed-up. Demographic and treatment variables were collected at baseline and at 6-months follow-up. LCA was applied to derive archetypes in a training set (80%). Fit and classification quality were assessed using aBIC, entropy, and posterior probabilities. Tool classification robustness was evaluated using Random Forest (RF) in a test set (20%), and generalizability was tested in an external multicenter cohort (N = 352).  Results: A six-class solution (Arch-1—Arch-6) was selected, achieving optimal fit, parsimony, high entropy (0.932), and clinical interpretability. Evaluated against RF, the tool demonstrated high classification concordance (99.68% accuracy). In the external cohort, high individual classification certainty was maintained (mean posterior probability = 0.965), supporting consistent assignment across care settings.  Conclusions: LCA provides a transparent, efficient and robust tool to identify patient archetypes and assign new patients based on therapeutic pathways, enabling fair benchmarking in VBHC. Prospective validation in broader cohorts is recommended to confirm transferability to other clinical conditions.
SN  - 2813-0146
ER  -