Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

RNA-guided contrastive learning enhances patient-level prediction from histology

  1. 1Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine

Abstract

Predicting molecular receptor status, including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), directly from routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) could reduce reliance on costly immunohistochemistry, but image-only models have no access to the transcriptomic programs that define these subtypes. Here we show that coupling a whole-slide vision transformer (GigaPath) with bulk RNA-sequencing profiles through a training-time-only contrastive objective improves receptor-status classification from WSIs alone, without requiring any RNA-seq data at inference. Rather than training a dedicated bulk-transcriptomics encoder, we purpose the gene-sentence encoding and pretrained text encoder from BioBERT1 and apply them to bulk RNA-seq profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas breast cancer cohort (TCGA-BRCA). Under five-fold cross-validation, this RNA-guided pre-training consistently improved AUROC for ER, PR, and HER2 relative to a contrastive-pre-training-free baseline and reproducibly introduced receptor-relevant structure into the learned slide representation. However, evaluation on independent external cohorts revealed a striking, receptor-dependent divergence: gains for ER and PR, both governed by broad, multi-gene luminal transcriptional programs, generalized robustly, whereas the apparent AUROC improvement for HER2, driven by focal ERBB2 amplification rather than a coordinated transcriptional signature, masked a severe loss of classification sensitivity at the operating threshold. These findings establish training-time transcriptomic supervision as a practical route to enhancing histology-only molecular subtyping, while showing that gene-selection strategy, and not model architecture alone, determines which molecular alterations such supervision can teach a vision model to recognize.

Related

  1. Spatially guided translation from histology images to transcriptomic profiles using foundation model-driven contrastive learning
    Zi Huai Huang, Ziyang Xu, Pingzhao Hu
    PLOS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textBioinformatics & computational biologyMedical imaging & radiologyPLOS
  2. Contrastive learning and advanced bundle metrics outperform fractional anisotropy for Alzheimer’s disease diffusion MRI prediction: findings from the Beyond FA challenge
    Elyssa McMaster, Nancy Newlin, Trent Schwartz +31
    Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. PRInter: an inductive multimodal heterogeneous network embedding framework with contrastive learning for lncRNA-protein interaction prediction
    Guoqing Zhao, Baolu Shi, Pengpai Li +1
    BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  4. Prediction of Spinal Pain Intensity from Perception-Dependent Stimulation Thresholds and Patient Characteristics: A Regression and Machine Learning Approach
    Kübra Okuyucu, Aybike Şenel, Ahmet Gülünay +1
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Modeling Factors Associated with Smoking Dependence Severity Using Binary Classification-Based Machine Learning: Prediction with Hematological and Demographic Patient Data
    Yavuz Korkmaz, İbrahim Miraç Eligüzel, Adem Taha Özdemir
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{zou2026rnaguided,
  title = {{RNA-guided contrastive learning enhances patient-level prediction from histology}},
  author = {A. Zou and E. Huang and Q. Wu and M. E. Barnard and C. Zhang},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.24.754149},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.754149v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - RNA-guided contrastive learning enhances patient-level prediction from histology
AU  - A. Zou
AU  - E. Huang
AU  - Q. Wu
AU  - M. E. Barnard
AU  - C. Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.24.754149
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.754149v1
AB  - Predicting molecular receptor status, including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), directly from routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) could reduce reliance on costly immunohistochemistry, but image-only models have no access to the transcriptomic programs that define these subtypes. Here we show that coupling a whole-slide vision transformer (GigaPath) with bulk RNA-sequencing profiles through a training-time-only contrastive objective improves receptor-status classification from WSIs alone, without requiring any RNA-seq data at inference. Rather than training a dedicated bulk-transcriptomics encoder, we purpose the gene-sentence encoding and pretrained text encoder from BioBERT1 and apply them to bulk RNA-seq profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas breast cancer cohort (TCGA-BRCA). Under five-fold cross-validation, this RNA-guided pre-training consistently improved AUROC for ER, PR, and HER2 relative to a contrastive-pre-training-free baseline and reproducibly introduced receptor-relevant structure into the learned slide representation. However, evaluation on independent external cohorts revealed a striking, receptor-dependent divergence: gains for ER and PR, both governed by broad, multi-gene luminal transcriptional programs, generalized robustly, whereas the apparent AUROC improvement for HER2, driven by focal ERBB2 amplification rather than a coordinated transcriptional signature, masked a severe loss of classification sensitivity at the operating threshold. These findings establish training-time transcriptomic supervision as a practical route to enhancing histology-only molecular subtyping, while showing that gene-selection strategy, and not model architecture alone, determines which molecular alterations such supervision can teach a vision model to recognize.
ER  -