Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Scientific Reports
Comparison of expert-rated quality and readability of four large language models answering patient-oriented questions on Peyronie’s disease
Related
- Reliability and readability of five large language models in answering patient-oriented questions about rectal prolapse: a comparative study
- Comparison of the performance of large language models (ChatGPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1, and Claude 4.6) in answering pharmacology questions
- How well do large language models answer postoperative lumbar fusion questions? A blinded comparative analysis of accuracy, quality, readability, and safety-related content
- Answering clinicians' questions over trial evidence tables with verifiable, feedback-driven language models
- Performance of large language models in answering orthodontic questions: A scoping review.
BibTeX
@article{erdik2026comparison,
title = {{Comparison of expert-rated quality and readability of four large language models answering patient-oriented questions on Peyronie’s disease}},
author = {Anil Erdik and Haci Ibrahim Cimen and Kemal Demirhan and Deniz Gul},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-72669-7},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-72669-7},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparison of expert-rated quality and readability of four large language models answering patient-oriented questions on Peyronie’s disease
AU - Anil Erdik
AU - Haci Ibrahim Cimen
AU - Kemal Demirhan
AU - Deniz Gul
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/03
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-72669-7
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-72669-7
SN - 2045-2322
ER -