Scientific preparedness for the future of mycology: mapping knowledge gaps to guide priority setting and emerging research opportunities
Abstract
Mycology has gained strategic importance far beyond its traditional disciplinary boundaries, yet research priorities still rely largely on expert consensus rather than on the accumulated structure of scientific knowledge. Whether national research ecosystems can provide objective evidence to guide future agendas remains insufficiently explored. Using Colombian mycology as a demonstrative case, this Perspective examines how scientometric evidence can support strategic planning rather than merely describe productivity. We reconstructed the national research ecosystem through 3,184 primary publications indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (1962–2026), integrating science mapping, segmented regression, concentration analyses, thematic classification, and inferential modeling to characterize growth, organization, thematic structure, collaboration, and factors associated with citation influence. The ecosystem showed sustained expansion, strong institutional concentration, uneven thematic representation, limited activity in several emerging domains, and increasing international collaboration. Adjusted citation models identified higher citation counts among internationally collaborative studies, selected thematic areas, larger author teams, and English-language publications. These associations reflect citation visibility rather than causal effects or broader scientific or societal importance. The findings identify underrepresented domains and organizational patterns that may inform future priority-setting in Colombia, but such domains should be treated as candidates for further evaluation, not confirmed priorities. Bibliometric underrepresentation alone cannot establish scientific, clinical, environmental, or policy relevance, however, this approach links retrospective mapping with prospective agenda development while preserving the distinction between visibility and priority. Scientific preparedness therefore depends not simply on greater productivity, but on the capacity of research ecosystems to convert knowledge structures into informed action.
Related
- Towards sustainable healthcare in otorhinolaryngology: assessing knowledge, engagement, and opportunities for change
- Spatially heterogenous distributions of dipteran abundances identify priority areas for haemosporidian parasite surveillance
- Health prevention research in France: Increasing investment is a priority, rethinking targets is equally crucial
- Priority Maps, Featureful Processing, and the Superior Colliculus
- Priority effects influence bacterial community assembly on temperate deciduous tree leaves
BibTeX
@article{lozadamartinez2026scientific,
title = {{Scientific preparedness for the future of mycology: mapping knowledge gaps to guide priority setting and emerging research opportunities}},
author = {Luz Miryam Lozada-Martinez and Ernesto Mario Barceló-Castellanos and Ernesto Barceló-Martinez and Fabriccio J. Visconti-Lopez and Ivan David Lozada-Martinez},
journal = {Frontiers in Microbiology},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.3389/fmicb.2026.1964320},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1964320},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Scientific preparedness for the future of mycology: mapping knowledge gaps to guide priority setting and emerging research opportunities
AU - Luz Miryam Lozada-Martinez
AU - Ernesto Mario Barceló-Castellanos
AU - Ernesto Barceló-Martinez
AU - Fabriccio J. Visconti-Lopez
AU - Ivan David Lozada-Martinez
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - Frontiers in Microbiology
DO - 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1964320
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1964320
AB - Mycology has gained strategic importance far beyond its traditional disciplinary boundaries, yet research priorities still rely largely on expert consensus rather than on the accumulated structure of scientific knowledge. Whether national research ecosystems can provide objective evidence to guide future agendas remains insufficiently explored. Using Colombian mycology as a demonstrative case, this Perspective examines how scientometric evidence can support strategic planning rather than merely describe productivity. We reconstructed the national research ecosystem through 3,184 primary publications indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (1962–2026), integrating science mapping, segmented regression, concentration analyses, thematic classification, and inferential modeling to characterize growth, organization, thematic structure, collaboration, and factors associated with citation influence. The ecosystem showed sustained expansion, strong institutional concentration, uneven thematic representation, limited activity in several emerging domains, and increasing international collaboration. Adjusted citation models identified higher citation counts among internationally collaborative studies, selected thematic areas, larger author teams, and English-language publications. These associations reflect citation visibility rather than causal effects or broader scientific or societal importance. The findings identify underrepresented domains and organizational patterns that may inform future priority-setting in Colombia, but such domains should be treated as candidates for further evaluation, not confirmed priorities. Bibliometric underrepresentation alone cannot establish scientific, clinical, environmental, or policy relevance, however, this approach links retrospective mapping with prospective agenda development while preserving the distinction between visibility and priority. Scientific preparedness therefore depends not simply on greater productivity, but on the capacity of research ecosystems to convert knowledge structures into informed action.
SN - 1664-302X
ER -